Peabody Energy Corporation

Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) Market Cap

Peabody Energy Corporation has a market capitalization of $3.12B.

Financials based on reported quarter end 2025-12-31

Price: $25.65

-1.27 (-4.74%)

Market Cap: 3.12B

NYSE · time unavailable

CEO: James C. Grech

Sector: Energy

Industry: Coal

IPO Date: 2017-04-03

Website: https://www.peabodyenergy.com

Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) - Company Information

Market Cap: 3.12B · Sector: Energy

Peabody Energy Corporation engages in coal mining business in the United States, Japan, Taiwan, Australia, India, Indonesia, China, Vietnam, South Korea, and internationally. The company operates through Seaborne Thermal Mining, Seaborne Metallurgical Mining, Powder River Basin Mining, and Other U.S. Thermal Mining segments. It is involved in mining, preparation, and sale of thermal coal primarily to electric utilities; mining bituminous and sub-bituminous coal deposits; and mining metallurgical coal, such as hard coking coal, semi-hard coking coal, semi-soft coking coal, and pulverized coal injection coal. The company supplies coal primarily to electricity generators, industrial facilities, and steel manufacturers. As of December 31, 2021, it owned interests in 17 coal mining operations located in the United States and Australia; and had approximately 2.5 billion tons of proven and probable coal reserves and approximately 450,000 acres of surface property through ownership and lease agreements. The company also engages in direct and brokered trading of coal and freight-related contracts, as well as provides transportation-related services. Peabody Energy Corporation was founded in 1883 and is headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri.

Analyst Sentiment

78%
Strong Buy

Based on 6 ratings

Analyst 1Y Forecast: $26.75

Average target (based on 4 sources)

Consensus Price Target

Low

$37

Median

$37

High

$37

Average

$37

Potential Upside: 42.3%

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 PEABODY ENERGY CORP (BTU) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Peabody Energy Corp (BTU) stands as one of the world’s largest pure-play coal companies, with mining operations across the United States and Australia. The company manages a diversified portfolio that serves both the thermal coal sector (primarily for electricity generation) and metallurgical coal (critical to steelmaking). Peabody’s vertically integrated approach spans resource development, mining, processing, transport logistics, sales, and, in select instances, land reclamation. This comprehensive reach allows Peabody to address the varied demands of major utility companies, industrial clients, and steel producers globally. Peabody’s business model prioritizes operational efficiency, cost leadership, and rigorous safety and environmental standards. Strategic asset placements near key domestic and export markets allow for competitive delivery logistics and reduced transportation costs, which are critical in the commoditized coal industry. Additionally, Peabody invests in mine optimization and operational improvements intended to sustain production efficiency across volatile commodity cycles.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Peabody’s revenue generation is centered around the sale of coal, divided principally into two categories: - **Thermal Coal Sales**: This segment constitutes the majority of total revenue. Peabody supplies coal to power utilities under both long-term contracts and spot market agreements. Contracts help lock in volume commitments and pricing, providing a degree of revenue stability while the spot market allows flexibility to capture favorable pricing during tight supply environments. - **Metallurgical Coal Sales**: Metallurgical coal, essential in global steel production, is priced and sold largely through export markets, particularly in Asia. Prices here tend to track steel sector cyclicality and are often more volatile but provide higher margins during upcycles. The company’s monetisation model is supported by an extensive logistics network—including rail, barge, and port access—enabling both domestic and seaborne sales. Peabody occasionally generates ancillary revenue from land reclamation projects, royalties, and technology licensing, but these streams are immaterial relative to core coal sales.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Peabody’s competitive strengths include: - **Scale and Diversification**: As an industry leader, Peabody operates mines of substantial scale, driving unit costs down relative to smaller peers. Geographic and product diversification across multiple basins (Powder River Basin, Illinois Basin, Australia) insulates against localized regulatory and market risks. - **Asset Quality and Reserve Life**: The company controls significant high-quality reserves with long mine lives, maintaining production optionality and reducing future resource risks. - **Customer Relationships and Contractual Base**: Long-standing relationships with leading utilities and steelmakers enhance demand certainty and pricing power. - **Operational Excellence**: Continuous focus on safety, efficiency, and technological upgrades have fostered a culture of operational reliability—a core differentiator in an unpredictable industry. - **Export Infrastructure**: A well-integrated export operation in Australia and proven access to Pacific Rim markets position Peabody advantageously for supplying coal to growth economies with rising energy and steel demands.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Multiple structural and cyclical themes support Peabody’s multi-year outlook: - **Global Energy Security and Affordability**: Coal remains an essential component in the global electricity generation mix, particularly in emerging markets where energy demand growth outpaces renewable deployment. Peabody’s diversified supply capabilities align with resilient baseline demand. - **Steel Sector Growth**: Advancements in global infrastructure and construction drive long-term metallurgical coal consumption, especially across South and East Asia. Peabody’s strong presence in seaborne met coal markets provides direct exposure. - **Operational Improvements**: Ongoing investment in mine productivity, automation, and logistics can further enhance margins and fortify the company against commodity downturns. - **Potential Carbon Technologies**: While still nascent, Peabody has engaged with carbon capture and storage initiatives, seeking to future-proof coal assets as governments and industries pursue decarbonization strategies. Participation in such technologies can unlock new revenue opportunities or improve cost competitiveness over time. - **Discipline in Capital Allocation**: Conservative reinvestment strategies, balance sheet strengthening, and dividend/buyback policies position Peabody to return capital to shareholders, elevating total returns across cycles.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

Investment in Peabody Energy carries material risks inherent to the coal industry: - **Regulatory and Environmental Policies**: Stringent emissions mandates, carbon tax regimes, or outright coal bans in key markets can significantly impair demand and asset values. - **Commodity Price Volatility**: Both thermal and metallurgical coal prices are subject to pronounced swings based on macroeconomic, supply/demand, and geopolitical factors, affecting revenue and cash flow predictability. - **Transition to Renewables**: Accelerated growth in renewables, coupled with widespread commitments to net-zero, may erode coal’s share of power generation faster than anticipated, especially in Western markets. - **Operational and Safety Hazards**: Mining is inherently hazardous; operational disruptions, accidents, or environmental liabilities can produce reputational, financial, or legal damages. - **International Trade Uncertainties**: Export revenues remain exposed to tariffs, trade tensions, or shifting import policies, particularly with major Asian buyers. - **Financial Leverage and Legacy Liabilities**: Historical bankruptcy has led to a more conservative capital structure, but residual reclamation and pension obligations remain sizable.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Peabody Energy’s valuation reflects both the volatility of coal commodity cycles and the secular uncertainty around long-term coal demand. Traditionally, the company has traded at a discount to broader industrials—often evaluated on an EV/EBITDA or price-to-earnings basis—due to perceived demand headwinds, carbon transition risks, and historical leverage. However, periods of elevated coal prices and robust free cash flow have at times supported outsized value creation, including shareholder returns via buybacks and dividends. Relative to peers, Peabody’s diversified portfolio, global market reach, and operational scale may warrant a modest valuation premium within the coal segment. Nevertheless, its investment profile continues to be shaped by persistent regulatory, ESG-related, and cyclical risks—which the market typically prices in via lower multiples and a higher required cost of capital. Investors frequently compare Peabody to international coal miners and diversified commodity producers to gauge its risk-reward balance.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Peabody Energy Corp offers exposure to large-scale coal production, serving both global power generation and steelmaking industries. The firm’s scale, asset quality, and operational focus provide strategic advantages in a consolidating sector challenged by long-term demand risks and rapid energy transition trends. Investors are attracted by Peabody’s significant free cash flow generation in strong pricing environments and its disciplined approach to capital returns. However, elevated commodity and regulatory risks, as well as structural headwinds in global decarbonization, underscore the necessity of a risk-tolerant, cycle-savvy investment approach. For those with a constructive stance on coal’s medium-term demand—particularly in developing markets and the steel sector—Peabody presents a levered bet on stable, cash-flow-rich assets with the potential for attractive shareholder returns. Ongoing ESG scrutiny and policy evolution, however, suggest the investment outlook will remain volatile and highly dependent on global policy and commodity cycles.

⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2025-12-31

"Headline (latest quarter, 2025-12-31): Revenue $1.022B and Net Income $10.4M (EPS $0.086). QoQ Revenue increased to $1.022B from $1.012B (+1.1%), while Net Income improved to $10.4M from a loss of $(70.1)M (turnaround vs prior quarter). Over the 4-quarter span, profitability has been volatile: net margin swung from about 3.7% in 2025-03-31 to losses in 2025-06-30 and 2025-09-30, then recovered to ~1.0% in 2025-12-31. EPS followed the same pattern (positive → negative → negative → positive). Cash flow quality improved recently: Free Cash Flow was positive in 2025-12-31 ($125.4M) and 2025-09-30 ($161.5M), but was negative in 2025-06-30 (FCF $(74.4)M). Dividends remain modest (~$9.0M–$9.2M per quarter). Balance sheet resilience looks solid with equity relatively stable (~$3.58B) and net debt remaining negative (net cash) throughout. Total shareholder returns are strong given marketPerformance: price is up +133.0% over 1 year (>20% threshold), with additional (but small) dividend income. Revenue and earnings-based metrics were not available for YoY comparison because prior-year quarters were not provided in the dataset."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

QoQ Revenue rose slightly to $1.022B (+1.1%) from $1.012B. YoY growth was not computable because the dataset lacks the same quarter from the prior year.

Profitability

Positive

Net margin recovered to ~1.0% in 2025-12-31 after losses in the prior two quarters; EPS moved from negative back to +0.086. Overall profitability is improving but still choppy across the 4-quarter period.

Cash Flow Quality

Positive

FCF turned positive in the last two quarters ($125.4M and $161.5M) after a negative quarter (2025-06-30). Dividends are small and appear covered in profitable quarters; no buyback data provided.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Good

Total equity is stable around ~$3.6B. Net debt is consistently negative (net cash position), improving resilience. Total assets are broadly stable.

Shareholder Returns

Strong

Total return signal is strongly positive due to +133% 1-year price performance (>20% momentum). Dividend yield is very low (~0.25% last quarter), so most value comes from price appreciation.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Positive

Consensus target of $36.50 vs current price $28.03 implies ~30% upside. However, trailing valuation looks elevated when profitable (P/E ~86.4 in the latest quarter), consistent with earnings volatility.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Management delivered a strongly positive tone, emphasizing record safety (0.71 incident rate) and environmental progress, then pivoted to Centurion as the core valuation lever (3.5M tons in 2026, ramping to 4.7M by 2028, with met realizations rising to 80% of the premium hard coking coal index and Centurion NPV cited at $2.1B at a $225 benchmark). However, the Q&A pressure points were more operational: shipment/cadence unevenness in 2026 from longwall sequencing (seaborne thermal “less than ratable” in Q1; seaborne met impacted by two longwall moves plus only ~two months of Centurion in Q1). Analysts also probed pricing sustainability beyond 2026—management wouldn’t quantify 2027 contract coverage but stressed layered pricing and ongoing contracting. Costs also have headwinds from volume effects (Wilpinjong/Wambo) and FX (AUD 70¢ assumption), while contract economics include meaningful royalty/tax take (~25% of upside). Overall: optimistic macro/contract posture, but near-term volume troughs and cost drivers remain tangible.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Centurion mine ramp: expected 3.5 million tons in 2026, reaching 4.7 million tons by 2028
  • Met coal realization improvement: met segment realizations expected to rise from 70% of benchmark (2025) to 80% in 2026
  • Seaborne met shipping growth: 10.8 million tons guided for 2026 with Centurion longwall start
  • US coal demand strength: US coal-fired generation up ~13% YoY in 2025 vs coal production up ~4%; stockpiles down ~15% YoY

Business Development

  • Agreement with a major Midwestern utility: >20 million tons of Illinois Basin coal over five years; >$1 billion total sales over time
  • Wyoming Energy Authority recommended $6.25 million grant for a pilot processing plant (public comment period; governor consideration later this month)
  • Government/partner siting discussions for US power plants using coal reserves (initial discussions with government officials and private partners)
  • Working with the Trump administration to increase US coal exports from the West Coast to Asian markets

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Q4 2025 EPS: net income attributable to common stockholders of $10.4M or $0.09 diluted share
  • Q4 2025 adj. EBITDA: $118M (+19% vs prior quarter)
  • Cash flow: $69M operating cash flow from continuing operations in Q4; $336M full-year 2025
  • Balance sheet: ended 2025 with $575M cash; total liquidity above $900M
  • Seaborne thermal (Q4): realized export pricing $81.80/ton (+7% from Q3); 31% adjusted EBITDA margin; $63.5M fourth-quarter EBITDA; costs 12% lower QoQ and below low end of guidance
  • Seaborne met: shipped 2.5M tons in Q4 (above target); $113/ton cost consistent with expectations; $24.6M adjusted EBITDA in Q4
  • US thermal (Q4): $63M adjusted EBITDA (segment-wide free cash flow emphasis; US thermal segment generated ~$250M adjusted EBITDA for the full year vs ~$57M CapEx)
  • PRB operations: 22.3M tons shipped in Q4 and 84.5M full-year (nearly +5M or +6% YoY); $44.8M adjusted EBITDA in Q4 and $175.8M full-year; PRB EBITDA margin +20% YoY on 6% tonnage increase (mostly flat price environment)
  • 2026 guidance—Seaborne thermal volumes: 12.5M tons total (8.0M export); costs expected above 2025 levels at $50/ton; mix 45% Newcastle / 55% higher-ash product
  • 2026 guidance—Seaborne met volumes: 10.8M tons; met costs targeted at $113/ton (~$1 lower than last year); segment average price realizations increasing to 80% of the premium hard coking coal index
  • 2026 guidance—Total CapEx: $340M (stated as $70M lower than 2025 as Centurion begins longwall production)

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Shareholder return emphasis: management reiterated returns as #1 capital allocation priority
  • 2026 CapEx: $340M (down $70M vs 2025)
  • No explicit buyback dollar figure disclosed in the provided transcript segment
  • Cash/liquidity: $575M cash; total liquidity >$900M at year-end 2025

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Centurion operations: South longwall starting imminently; ramp cadence provided—~700k tons in Q1, ~1.0–1.1M in Q2 and Q3, then lower in Q4 due to longwall move
  • Seaborne thermal shipment cadence: less ratable in Q1 due to sequencing (Wilpinjong and Wambo open cut); expected to bounce in Q2 and higher in Q3
  • Seaborne met production cadence headwind: two longwall moves (Met Trop and Shoal Creek) expected to lower production; also only ~two months of Centurion production in early quarter

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Aussie dollar cost assumption for 2026: $0.70 (70¢), described as “pretty much where we’re at today”
  • Met benchmark basis for 2026: using a $225 benchmark (explicitly stated by management)
  • US coal demand view: expectation that existing coal plants can cover incremental demand; 35 GW of coal retirements deferred (35 gigawatts mentioned as a retirements deferral figure)

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Seaborne thermal Q1 constrained by mine sequencing: Wilpinjong and Wambo open cut are ‘less than ratable’ in Q1; impacts cadence more than guidance-level demand
  • Seaborne met near-term production lowered by longwall moves: Met Trop and Shoal Creek undergoing longwall moves; Centurion limited to ~two months of production in Q1
  • Australian costs: 70¢ AUD assumption is ~4¢–5¢ higher than realized last year, management cited it as having an approximate ~$34 impact (context: seaborne thermal cost year-over-year drivers)
  • Domestic PRB pricing/cost mechanics: PRB costs not typically cost-linked/efficiency-linked; they rise and fall mainly with government policy impositions and taxes
  • Tax/royalty share of price upside: management indicated royalties/taxes ‘could be 25%, something like that’ (i.e., partial price upside gets taken away)

Sentiment: POSITIVE

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the BTU Q4 2025 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (BTU)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Peabody Energy Corporation (BTU) Financial Profile