Cadiz Inc.

Cadiz Inc. (CDZI) Market Cap

Cadiz Inc. has a market capitalization of $403.8M.

Financials based on reported quarter end 2025-12-31

Price: $4.84

β–² 0.01 (0.21%)

Market Cap: 403.77M

NASDAQ Β· time unavailable

CEO: Susan Kennedy

Sector: Utilities

Industry: Regulated Water

IPO Date: 1989-01-03

Website: https://www.cadizinc.com

Cadiz Inc. (CDZI) - Company Information

Market Cap: 403.77M Β· Sector: Utilities

Cadiz Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as a natural resources development company in the United States. It engages in the water resource and agricultural development activities in San Bernardino County properties. The company owns approximately 35,000 acres of land in the Cadiz and Fenner valleys of eastern San Bernardino County; and approximately 11,000 acres of land in the eastern Mojave Desert portion of San Bernardino County. It is also involved in the cultivation of lemons, and spring and fall plantings of vegetables and grains. Cadiz Inc. was founded in 1983 and is headquartered in Los Angeles, California.

Analyst Sentiment

89%
Strong Buy

Based on 3 ratings

Analyst 1Y Forecast: $10.00

Average target (based on 1 sources)

Consensus Price Target

Low

$10

Median

$10

High

$10

Average

$10

Potential Upside: 106.6%

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

πŸ“˜ Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

πŸ“˜ CADIZ INC (CDZI) β€” Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

CADIZ, Inc. is positioned as a long-duration water solution company focused on developing and monetizing water supply capacity in California. The economic β€œengine” is built around sourcing water through its project infrastructure and then delivering reliability value to customers that need dependable water supply during constrained hydrology cycles.

The value chain typically includes: (1) securing and maintaining rights and permits tied to water capture, transport, and recharge, (2) building and operating the necessary water infrastructure to move and store water, and (3) monetizing that capacity via contracts for delivered water and/or related entitlements and project economics.

Customer stickiness is driven less by β€œsoftware-like” switching costs and more by the lead times and permitting intensity required to replace supply arrangements, making qualified, contracted supply capacity materially difficult for counterparties to replicate on short notice.

πŸ’° Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue generation primarily hinges on contracted water supply economics. Monetisation generally falls into two buckets:

  • Water-related sales/contracted deliveries: recurring in nature to the extent customers maintain contracted capacity and volumes. Margin profile depends on power/operating costs, infrastructure utilization, and the mix of contract structures (volume-based vs. capacity/availability elements).
  • Project and contract-linked fees/arrangements: where applicable, project milestones and contract terms can support incremental revenue, though these are typically less predictable than ongoing deliveries.

For margin drivers, investors should focus on (1) utilization and realized delivered water economics, (2) ongoing operating cost discipline, and (3) the degree to which contractual terms pass through or mitigate input cost and regulatory compliance burdens.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

CADIZ’s moat is best described as a regulatory-and-permitting moat with scarce-resource economics, reinforced by meaningful implementation switching costs.

  • Intangible asset: water rights, permits, and entitlements
    Control of legal and regulatory permissions for water capture, storage, recharge, and delivery can be difficult to obtain and even harder to replicate without extensive time and legal/regulatory risk.
  • Switching costs for customers
    Water supply planning for municipal/industrial users involves multi-year procurement cycles, infrastructure constraints, and compliance requirements. Replacing a qualified supply arrangement is costly and slow, increasing the value of contracted reliability.
  • Execution credibility tied to infrastructure
    Where infrastructure is already engineered and positioned for delivery, the incremental path for additional volumes can benefit from existing fixed assets and operational know-howβ€”though this remains subject to utilization and compliance.

While broader water storage and conveyance solutions exist in California, the combination of entitlement scarcity, permitting complexity, and long project lifecycles makes market share gains reliant on sustained regulatory progress and operational execution rather than simple commercial marketing.

πŸš€ Multi-Year Growth Drivers

The multi-year opportunity is linked to structural demand for reliable water supply and the economics of managing stressed groundwater basins. Key drivers over a 5–10 year horizon include:

  • Climate and hydrology stress in the western U.S.
    Increased volatility in rainfall and snowpack elevates the value of dependable storage and managed recharge capacity.
  • Regulatory pressure on groundwater sustainability
    Basin management frameworks and compliance requirements tend to increase the value of projects that can demonstrate water management outcomes.
  • Demand growth for reliability in municipal and industrial customers
    Water systems prioritize stability and compliance, supporting longer procurement horizons for approved supply.
  • Potential expansion of contracted capacity
    Growth often materializes through securing additional counterparties, expanding contracted volumes, or deepening delivery arrangements as project milestones are met.

TAM expansion is best framed not as an unlimited market but as the subset of water solutions that clear regulatory hurdles and deliver measurable supply reliability within constrained geography and legal frameworks. In this context, CADIZ’s value proposition benefits from buyers’ preference for dependable, permissioned capacity.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Regulatory and legal uncertainty
    Water projects in California face evolving environmental oversight, litigation risk, and potential changes to permitting requirements or conditions.
  • Operational and hydrological variability
    Realized results can be influenced by water availability, system performance, and compliance constraints tied to environmental safeguards.
  • Financing and capital intensity
    Infrastructure buildout and operational readiness can require funding; dilution risk and cost of capital can materially affect long-term value creation.
  • Contracting and counterparty dynamics
    Demand is shaped by municipal budgeting cycles and contract terms; counterparties may renegotiate volumes, pricing, or delivery schedules.
  • Reputational and stakeholder risk
    Water projects operate under heightened scrutiny; stakeholder opposition can increase timelines and impose incremental costs.

πŸ“Š Valuation & Market View

For water infrastructure and resource-constrained project developers, valuation often centers on asset-backed economics and the pathway to contracted cash flows rather than pure near-term earnings. Market participants typically emphasize:

  • EV/EBITDA (or forward operating leverage) once deliveries are established and operating cost visibility improves.
  • P/S or asset-adjusted frameworks during earlier stages when revenues are tied to progress toward delivery capacity.
  • Scenario-based DCF driven by contracted volume, delivery timelines, regulatory outcomes, and sustained compliance costs.

Key β€œneedle movers” include the credibility and timing of water delivery milestones, the durability of customer contracting, and evidence that regulatory and environmental requirements can be met without structurally impairing unit economics.

πŸ” Investment Takeaway

CADIZ’s long-term investment case rests on a scarce-resource and regulatory entitlement position that can translate into contracted water supply economics. The core moat is the difficulty competitors face in replicating the combination of water rights/permits, delivery readiness, and the high switching costs embedded in municipal water planning. The primary path to value is execution: securing durable delivery arrangements, demonstrating consistent operational performance under environmental constraints, and managing the financing and legal timeline risk inherent to water infrastructure.


⚠ AI-generated β€” informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

πŸ“Š AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2025-12-31

"CDZI (reported quarter ended 2025-12-31) generated revenue of $5.08M and reported a net loss of $9.74M, translating to EPS of -$0.13. Profitability remains challenged: net margin is approximately -191% (net income/revenue), reflecting substantial bottom-line losses. Cash flow also weakened, with operating cash flow of -$6.92M and free cash flow of -$8.25M. The company spent $1.33M on capex and paid $1.27M in dividends during the period, which together add pressure while generating negative FCF. On the balance sheet, total assets were $140.9M versus total liabilities of $117.7M, leaving equity of $23.3M. Net debt was $22.9M, indicating meaningful leverage relative to equity. Valuation signals are limited in the provided dataset (no market cap, P/E, or FCF yield), but analyst consensus price target sits at $10, above the current price of $4.91. Shareholder returns look mixed in fundamentals, yet the stock has strong market momentum: the shares are up 67.6% over the past 1 year, despite a negative YTD move (-15.3%). Overall, the investment narrative appears driven more by price momentum and forward expectations than by near-term earnings and cash generation."

Revenue Growth

Caution

Revenue of $5.08M is provided for the quarter, but no prior-period comparison is included, limiting assessment of growth trend or stability.

Profitability

Neutral

Net income was -$9.74M with EPS of -$0.13, implying a net margin around -191%. Losses indicate weak profitability and/or elevated costs.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Operating cash flow was -$6.92M and free cash flow was -$8.25M. Dividends paid were $1.27M, while FCF remained negative, suggesting reliance on financing or balance sheet support.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Caution

Equity of $23.3M supports the balance sheet, but leverage is meaningful: net debt was $22.9M with total liabilities of $117.7M versus assets of $140.9M.

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

Total shareholder value creation is mixed fundamentally (negative earnings and FCF, dividends paid), but the stock shows strong 1-year momentum (+67.6%), which supports the shareholder-return score on a total-return basis dominated by price appreciation.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Fair

Consensus target is $10 versus a current price of $4.91 (target implies upside), but valuation multiples (P/E, FCF yield) and market cap are not provided, limiting a full valuation assessment.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Loading financial data and tables...
πŸ“

SEC Filings (CDZI)

Β© 2026 Stock Market Info β€” Cadiz Inc. (CDZI) Financial Profile