Great Southern Bancorp, Inc.

Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. (GSBC) Market Cap

Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. has a market capitalization of $730.7M.

Financials based on reported quarter end 2026-03-31

Price: $66.65

-0.17 (-0.25%)

Market Cap: 730.69M

NASDAQ · time unavailable

CEO: Joseph William Turner

Sector: Financial Services

Industry: Banks - Regional

IPO Date: 1989-12-15

Website: https://www.greatsouthernbank.com

Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. (GSBC) - Company Information

Market Cap: 730.69M · Sector: Financial Services

Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. operates as a bank holding company for Great Southern Bank that offers a range of financial services in the United States. Its deposit products include regular savings accounts, checking accounts, money market accounts, fixed interest rate certificates with varying maturities, certificates of deposit, brokered certificates, and individual retirement accounts. The company's loan portfolio comprises residential and commercial real estate loans, construction loans, commercial business loans, home improvement loans, and unsecured consumer loans, as well as secured consumer loans, including automobile loans, boat loans, home equity loans, loans secured by savings deposits. It also provides insurance and merchant banking services. As of December 31, 2021, the company operated 93 retail banking centers and approximately 200 automated teller machines in Missouri, Iowa, Minnesota, Kansas, Nebraska, and Arkansas; and six commercial and one mortgage loan production offices in Atlanta, Chicago, Dallas, Denver, Omaha, Nebraska, Phoenix and Tulsa, Oklahoma, Springfield, and Missouri. Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. was founded in 1923 and is headquartered in Springfield, Missouri.

Analyst Sentiment

56%
Buy

Based on 6 ratings

Analyst 1Y Forecast: $0.00

Average target (based on 1 sources)

Consensus Price Target

Low

$62

Median

$62

High

$62

Average

$62

Downside: -7.0%

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 GREAT SOUTHERN BANCORP INC (GSBC) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

GREAT SOUTHERN BANCORP INC operates as a regional financial institution focused on deposit gathering and loan origination within its geographic footprint. The value chain is conventional for community-oriented banks: (1) attract and retain retail and small-business deposits through branch presence, customer service, and relationship management; (2) allocate capital into diversified earning assets, primarily loans and securities; (3) generate net interest income by earning spreads between yields on assets and costs of liabilities; and (4) support fee-based income through ancillary banking services (e.g., deposit-related fees, lending-related fees, and cash management/treasury services).

The model’s economic engine is customer retention and efficient balance-sheet management. For depositors, switching away is often operationally costly—moving payables/receivables, reconfiguring payroll, and updating payment instructions—creating meaningful stickiness. For borrowers, local knowledge, underwriting relationships, and established credit histories add further friction to switching.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is dominated by net interest income (NII), with profitability driven by the interaction of (a) loan yields, (b) security and investment portfolio yields, (c) deposit pricing, and (d) interest-rate and mix dynamics across liabilities and assets. In practice, margin and earning-asset growth are the key monetisation levers: loan growth and credit selection influence asset yields, while deposit beta and competitive intensity influence funding costs.

Non-interest income provides diversification, typically comprising fee income associated with lending, account services, and transaction activity. Operating expense discipline and credit quality are central to maintaining returns: banks translate revenue into earnings through the cost-to-income ratio and through provisions/charge-offs that reflect the credit cycle.

Key margin drivers include: (1) the composition of earning assets (loan mix vs. securities mix), (2) the duration/interest-rate sensitivity of the balance sheet, and (3) deposit franchise quality—i.e., the stability and pricing efficiency of the deposit base during rate cycles.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Primary Moat: Switching Costs + Relationship Depth

GSBC benefits from relationship-driven banking where historical interactions and account infrastructure create switching friction. Deposits are not merely a “product”—they are operationally embedded in customers’ payment systems and household or business cash management. Similarly, borrowers often value local underwriting experience, credit knowledge, and responsiveness, which can be difficult for larger, more standardized competitors to replicate at the account level.

Cost Advantages of Scale in a Regional Model

While regional banks do not match the absolute scale of national money-center institutions, they can sustain efficiency through targeted branch footprints, centralized credit operations, and consistent underwriting frameworks. Efficiency translates into better conversion of revenue into earnings, particularly during periods of margin compression or higher provisioning.

Intangible Asset: Local Brand and Trust

Community banking typically accumulates intangible value—trust, responsiveness, and reputation—that supports deposit retention and loan origination. This brand-based intangible is not easily transferable across geographies and tends to compound over time as customer relationships deepen.

Competitive challenge is primarily an “economics of the relationship” problem for entrants: capturing share requires not only marketing spend but also disrupting deposit behavior and underwriting relationships, both of which can be costly.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

1) Organic Loan Growth with Selectivity

Across a five-to-ten year horizon, growth prospects depend on maintaining a disciplined underwriting posture while expanding lending relationships. In regional banking, the TAM is typically defined by local demand for credit tied to households, agriculture/SME ecosystems, and local economic activity. The durable advantage is the ability to originate and retain customers with strong cash-flow fundamentals.

2) Deposit Franchise Expansion

Deposit growth often outpaces loan growth in weaker credit environments and supports liquidity and funding stability over time. A sustained deposit franchise enables GSBC to fund asset growth without excessive reliance on wholesale funding, supporting earnings durability.

3) Fee Income Support from Deeper Customer Penetration

As banking relationships mature, customers tend to use additional services (lending services, treasury/cash management, and account-related offerings). Penetration supports non-interest income resilience and reduces dependence on net interest margins.

4) Technology as an Enabler (Not a Substitute)

Digital channels can lower per-transaction service costs and improve customer retention. The strategic goal is to reduce friction in account management while preserving the relationship model—particularly for lending and service recovery during stress events.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

1) Net Interest Margin Compression

Banks remain exposed to rate-cycle dynamics and competitive deposit pricing. Margin pressure can persist when asset yields reprice more slowly than liability costs or when competition forces deposit rates higher without corresponding asset yield improvements.

2) Credit Quality and Economic Cyclicality

A regional loan book is sensitive to local employment, real estate conditions, and borrower cash-flow variability. Monitoring includes watchpoints on delinquency trends, commercial credit concentrations, collateral values, and the adequacy of allowance methodology through cycles.

3) Regulatory and Compliance Burden

Capital requirements, stress testing expectations, and consumer protection rules can constrain growth or raise compliance costs. Changes in examination intensity or supervisory guidance may affect provisioning practices and balance-sheet strategy.

4) Liquidity and Funding Concentration

A deposit base that is stable is a strength, but concentration in funding sources or increased competition can elevate liquidity risk. Monitoring includes deposit mix, uninsured deposit exposure, and reliance on any non-core funding channels.

5) Technology and Cyber Risk

Digital banking improvements carry operational and cyber-security risks. A credible security posture is necessary to protect customer trust and prevent service disruptions.

📊 Valuation & Market View

The market typically values regional banks using a framework that ties earnings power to tangible book value and capital efficiency. Common reference points include P/TBV (or related tangible measures), as well as efficiency and profitability metrics that reflect NII sustainability, credit cycle normalization, and expense discipline.

For banks, valuation sensitivity usually concentrates around: (1) sustainable return on assets/equity through credit normalization, (2) capital strength that supports growth without dilutive actions, (3) deposit franchise stability and margin trajectory, and (4) credibility of management’s balance-sheet and credit underwriting discipline.

In this context, “multiple expansion” is typically earned through improved earnings durability rather than through aggressive growth. Conversely, valuation compression tends to follow perceived credit deterioration, structural margin headwinds, or weaker capital dynamics.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

GSBC’s long-term investment case rests on the durability of a community/regional banking franchise: customer switching costs anchored in deposit and lending relationships, a cost-and-underwriting model designed to convert local opportunities into repeatable earnings, and intangible trust that supports retention. The primary thesis requirement is consistent balance-sheet management—protecting net interest income through cycles, maintaining disciplined credit quality, and sustaining capital levels to fund organic growth. For investors seeking evergreen exposure to relationship-driven banking economics, the key is to underwrite earnings durability through margin and credit cycles.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2026-03-31

"Headline (latest quarter, 2026-03-31): Revenue $71.2M, Net Income $17.5M, EPS $1.59. Revenue and net income both declined sequentially (QoQ) versus 2025-12-31 (Revenue -11.8%, Net Income +7.3%), but EPS rose to $1.59 from $1.43. Over the full 4-quarter span, profitability moved within a fairly tight band: net income peaked in 2025-06-30 ($19.8M) and ended at $17.5M, suggesting modest margin pressure or mix headwinds after mid-2025. YoY comparison is not fully computable here because the same-quarter-last-year (2025-03-31) fundamentals were not provided. Balance sheet stability looks constructive for a bank: total equity stayed steady (about $622M–$636M) while total assets declined slightly QoQ from $5.60B to $5.69B, and net debt increased (net debt up to $369M from $307M), which is a mild leverage/funding-risk flag but not an equity-capital deterioration. Cash flow shows volatile but generally positive free cash flow in earlier quarters, while dividends remained consistent ($0.43/share in the last three quarters; $0.40 in 2025-06-30) with no payout-stress signals in the provided payout ratios (~0.23–0.30). Total shareholder returns are strong: the stock is up +31.1% over 1 year (>20% momentum), and dividends add additional carry. Valuation sentiment appears mixed: the consensus price target (62) is below the current price (68.29)."

Revenue Growth

Fair

QoQ revenue fell from $80.8M (2025-12-31) to $71.2M (2026-03-31), -11.8%. Across the 4-quarter window, revenue trended down from $89.5M (2025-06-30) to $71.2M (2026-03-31). YoY growth for the same quarter last year was not available because 2025-03-31 data was not provided.

Profitability

Positive

Net income increased QoQ from $16.3M to $17.5M (+7.3%) and EPS rose from $1.43 to $1.59. Over the full 4-quarter period, net income declined from a mid-period high ($19.8M in 2025-06-30) to $17.5M in the latest quarter, indicating only modest margin compression.

Cash Flow Quality

Positive

FCF is not reported for the latest quarter, but earlier quarters show positive free cash flow (e.g., +$34.9M in 2025-06-30; +$11.9M in 2025-09-30). Dividends are steady (0.43/share in the latest quarter’s surrounding periods) and payout ratios are moderate (~0.23–0.30), supporting dividend sustainability.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Positive

As a bank, equity stability is the key signal: total equity remained relatively flat ($622M–$636M). Total assets eased slightly from earlier quarters, while net debt increased to $369M (from $307M in 2025-12-31), a mild negative for funding leverage, but no equity deterioration is evident in the data.

Shareholder Returns

Strong

Strong total return momentum: price is up +31.1% over 1 year (>20% threshold). Dividends are ongoing (no dividend cuts indicated; 0.43/share in recent quarters), and share count declined (from 11.40M to 10.99M), suggesting buyback support.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Fair

Consensus price target is 62 versus current price 68.29, implying the stock trades above target expectations. Sentiment/valuation appears somewhat stretched near-term, despite strong momentum.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

In Q4 2025, GSBC delivered a notable earnings beat driven more by cost discipline and funding-cost management than by loan growth. Net income rose to $16.3M ($1.45 EPS) on the quarter as the company expanded net interest margin to 3.70% (from 3.49% a year ago), offsetting a key operational headwind: the terminated interest rate swap removed about $2.0M of quarterly income. Analysts pushed on 2026 direction—especially whether margin could keep rising and whether loan payoffs are stabilizing. Management was candid that margin likely won’t structurally improve beyond the current level (“don’t see anything…different,” and deposit repricing benefits are mostly already captured) and emphasized that loan growth remains challenging due to borrower-driven payoff timing that is difficult to forecast. Expense guidance also tilted cautious: a reset in salaries/benefits and payroll taxes was flagged as likely raising costs from Q4 levels. Net: management tone sounded confident on resilience, but the Q&A confirmed limited upside levers and persistent payoff pressure.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Net interest margin expansion to 3.70% annualized in Q4 2025 (vs. 3.49% a year ago) despite swap-related income loss
  • Selective loan production continued in 4Q 2025, including funding of construction deals with day-1 funding on certain projects

Business Development

    AI IconFinancial Highlights

    • Net income: $16.3M ($1.45 diluted EPS) in Q4 2025 vs $14.9M ($1.27 EPS) prior-year quarter
    • Net interest income (NII): $49.2M in Q4 2025 vs $49.5M prior-year quarter (-$0.3M, -0.7%); management attributed decline primarily to loss of income from terminated interest rate swap (about $2.0M quarterly income lost)
    • Interest income: $73.4M in Q4 2025 vs $82.6M in Q4 2024 (swap discontinuation + lower loan balances)
    • Interest expense: $24.3M in Q4 2025; supported by funding-cost reductions including repayment of $75M subordinated debt in June 2025 (management cited ~$1.1M lower interest expense in Q4 vs Q4 2024)
    • Net interest margin: expanded to 3.70% (from 3.49% year-ago); no explicit bps figure stated
    • Noninterest expense: $36.0M in Q4 2025 vs $36.9M in Q4 2024 (-$0.9M, -2.6%); drop driven by $2.0M prior-year contract/litigation charge not recurring
    • Efficiency ratio: 63.89% in Q4 2025 vs 65.43% year-ago (and 62.45% linked quarter)
    • Credit: Nonperforming assets 0.15% of total assets at year-end; Q4 2025 recorded net recoveries of $22K vs net charge-offs of $155K in Q4 2024
    • Provisioning: No provision for credit losses in Q4 2025; but provision for unfunded commitments recorded at $882K in Q4 2025 vs $1.6M in Q4 2024

    AI IconCapital Funding

    • Share repurchases: 241,000 shares in Q4 2025 at average price $59.33; 755,000 shares in full-year 2025 at average price $58.35
    • Dividend: $0.43/share quarterly cash dividend declared for Q4 2025; full-year regular quarterly dividends totaled $1.66/share
    • Liquidity/capital: Cash & cash equivalents $189.6M at year-end; access to ~$1.63B additional borrowing capacity (Home Loan Bank + Federal Reserve Bank)
    • Capital levels: Stockholders' equity $636.1M (11.4% of total assets); book value per common share $57.50; tangible common equity 11.2% (vs. 9.9% at year-end 2024)

    AI IconStrategy & Ops

    • Margin explanation: redeployment of cash flows into loans with higher rates as lower short-term fixed-rate loans renew/repay; continued proactive management to reduce funding costs
    • Expenses: Q&A indicated expected uptick vs Q4 due to annual normal increases, payroll tax reset, and related beginning-of-year dynamics
    • Balance sheet: year-end net loans (ex mortgage loans held for sale) $4.36B, down $333.5M (-7.1% YoY) attributed to elevated payoff activity as capital markets eased

    AI IconMarket Outlook

    • Margin outlook (2026): management said they cannot guide but do not expect margin to go higher necessarily; no expectation of further meaningful deposit benefit, with any improvement constrained until Fed acts
    • Loan growth outlook: management indicated continued challenging loan growth market; payoffs expected to remain an obstacle and timing/magnitude is borrower-dependent; no quantified loan growth target provided
    • Repurchases: management implied likely continued buyback given valuation (less than 115% of book) and capital position, but did not provide a numeric remaining-share authorization

    AI IconRisks & Headwinds

    • Swap disruption: termination of an interest rate swap resulted in ~$2.0M quarterly income loss in Q4 2025, pressuring NII/interest income
    • Elevated payoff activity: loan balances down -7.1% YoY; management highlighted the primary headwind as continued outsized loan paydowns with hard-to-predict timing
    • Competitive funding environment: deposit markets competitive across core and brokered channels; management cited need to balance pricing discipline with retention and use nondeposit funding sources as appropriate
    • Credit provisioning pressure on commitments: provision for unfunded commitments $882K in Q4 2025 (down from $1.6M prior-year quarter), indicating continued exposure via unfunded balances
    • Expense normalization: expected expense uptick vs Q4 due to annual wage increases and payroll tax reset

    Sentiment: MIXED

    Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the GSBC Q4 2025 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

    Loading financial data and tables...
    📁

    SEC Filings (GSBC)

    © 2026 Stock Market Info — Great Southern Bancorp, Inc. (GSBC) Financial Profile