The Hackett Group, Inc.

The Hackett Group, Inc. (HCKT) Market Cap

The Hackett Group, Inc. has a market capitalization of $364.2M.

Financials based on reported quarter end 2025-12-26

Price: $14.35

0.21 (1.49%)

Market Cap: 364.21M

NASDAQ · time unavailable

CEO: Ted A. Fernandez

Sector: Technology

Industry: Information Technology Services

IPO Date: 1998-05-28

Website: https://www.thehackettgroup.com

The Hackett Group, Inc. (HCKT) - Company Information

Market Cap: 364.21M · Sector: Technology

The Hackett Group, Inc. operates as a strategic advisory and technology consulting firm primarily in North America and internationally. It offers best practice intelligence center, an online searchable repository; best practice accelerators that provide web-based access to best practices, customized software configuration tools, and best practice process flows; advisor inquiry for access to fact-based advice on proven approaches and methods; best practice research that provides insights into the proven approaches; and peer interaction comprising member-led webcasts, annual best practice conferences, annual member forums, membership performance surveys, and client-submitted content, as well as intellectual property as-a-service and Hackett Institute programs. The company's benchmarking services conduct studies for selling, general and administrative, finance, human resources, information technology, procurement, enterprise performance management, and shared services; and business transformation practices to help clients develop coordinated strategy for achieving performance enhancements across the enterprise. It also provides Oracle EEA solutions for core financial close and consolidation, integrated business planning, and reporting/advanced analytics areas. In addition, the company offers SAP solutions, including planning, architecture, and vendor evaluation and selection through implementation, customization, testing, and integration; post-implementation support, change management, exception management, process transparency, system documentation, and end-user training; off-shore application development, and application maintenance and support services; and OneStream practice that helps clients choose and deploy OneStream XF Platform and Market Place solutions. The company was formerly known as Answerthink, Inc. and changed its name to The Hackett Group, Inc. in 2008. The Hackett Group, Inc. was founded in 1991 and is headquartered in Miami, Florida.

Analyst Sentiment

83%
Strong Buy

Based on 5 ratings

Analyst 1Y Forecast: $20.50

Average target (based on 1 sources)

Consensus Price Target

Low

$17

Median

$21

High

$24

Average

$21

Potential Upside: 42.9%

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 HACKETT GROUP INC (HCKT) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

HACKETT GROUP INC operates in the professional services arena for fashion retail, delivering licensing/wholesale-style brand commerce and related commercial activities through brand partners and channel distribution. The business model converts brand equity into revenue by placing curated product lines across multiple customer touchpoints (e.g., wholesale partners, direct-to-consumer channels where applicable, and brand licensing arrangements where used).

The value chain is straightforward: develop and maintain brand positioning, translate that into product assortments and merchandising standards, then monetize through distribution relationships. Customer “stickiness” is driven less by individual transactions and more by the credibility of the brand in the minds of consumers and retailers, plus the embedded processes required to launch, forecast, and replenish merchandise to channel expectations.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue typically comes from a combination of wholesale/distribution and brand-led commercial arrangements. The monetisation model benefits from:

  • Recurring commercial cycles: merchandising and seasonal assortment planning repeat on an annual cadence, with replenishment and partner reorders supporting continuity.
  • Channel leverage: utilization of brand demand across multiple channels reduces reliance on a single buyer group.
  • Margin drivers: gross margin is influenced by product mix, pricing discipline, inventory management, and the mix between wholesale vs. direct economics.

While revenue can be seasonal, the underlying economics are shaped by the ability to sustain full-price sell-through (or manage discounting) and maintain channel partner confidence. Ongoing brand investment—design, merchandising capability, and marketing support—acts as the economic “engine” behind monetisation quality.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

The primary moat is an intangible asset moat centered on brand equity and merchandising competence. In consumer and retail-facing apparel categories, the hard part is not manufacturing scale alone; it is sustaining perceived brand value and translating that into sell-through across changing trends.

  • Intangible Assets (Brand Equity): Brand recognition and consumer association support premium pricing and improved acceptance by retail partners.
  • Switching Costs (Operational & Assortment Fit): Retail partners and channel stakeholders build merchandising systems around brand standards—forecasting, product presentations, and replenishment patterns—making replacement less attractive mid-cycle.
  • Reputation/Execution Track Record: Consistent assortment quality and timely seasonal delivery reduce partner risk and improve contract stickiness.

This moat tends to be durable but not invulnerable. Competitors can introduce similar aesthetics, but replicating the brand’s commercial credibility and merchandising execution takes time and sustained spend.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

A 5–10 year outlook for a brand-led apparel commerce model generally depends on TAM expansion, channel productivity, and brand extension discipline. Key structural drivers include:

  • Global brand penetration: Growth can come from expanding distribution footprint and deepening partner coverage.
  • Direct-to-consumer and omnichannel refinement: Where direct channels exist, they can improve data capture, customer retention, and merchandising control.
  • Product category adjacency: Extending the brand into compatible categories and price points can grow average lifetime brand consumption without fully resetting the customer base.
  • Capital-efficient growth: Brand-led models can scale with less balance-sheet intensity than vertically integrated apparel manufacturing, provided inventory risk is managed.

Over a full cycle, the most durable growth tends to come from maintaining brand relevance (assortment discipline) and securing distribution capacity (partner trust and shelf/online visibility).

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Demand volatility and fashion-cycle risk: Mispricing or assortment mismatch can pressure sell-through and increase discounting.
  • Inventory and working-capital risk: Inadequate demand planning can lead to inventory overhang and margin deterioration.
  • Channel concentration: Dependence on fewer partners or specific distribution routes can amplify revenue swings if partner priorities change.
  • Brand relevance risk: Consumer preference shifts can erode brand equity and reduce premium pricing power.
  • Competitive intensity: Competitors can increase promotional intensity, driving industry-level margin pressure.
  • Cost inflation: Input costs, freight, and fulfillment economics can compress margins without effective pricing/mix responses.

These risks are structural to apparel and brand commerce rather than one-off operational issues; monitoring product sell-through quality, inventory turns, and partner renewal behavior is central.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Markets often value brand-led apparel and retail-adjacent business models using EV/EBITDA and EV/Sales frameworks, with additional attention to gross margin sustainability, operating leverage, and cash conversion.

Valuation is typically most sensitive to:

  • Margin quality: ability to sustain gross margin through pricing discipline and favorable mix.
  • Inventory discipline: reduced discounting and improved working-capital efficiency.
  • Partner stability: durability of distribution agreements and shelf/online momentum.
  • Opex leverage: scaling brand and merchandising capabilities without linear cost growth.

Because the moat is intangible, the market tends to reward evidence of brand health (sell-through, retention, and partner confidence) more than short-term earnings fluctuations.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

HACKETT GROUP INC fits a brand-equity investment profile where the durable asset is intangible brand value supported by merchandising execution and channel relationships. The long-term thesis rests on sustaining brand relevance, managing inventory and promotional discipline, and maintaining distribution leverage so that revenue quality and margins remain resilient across fashion cycles.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2025-12-26

"HCKT reported revenue of $76.7M and a net income of $5.6M. The company's earnings per share (EPS) stands at $0.21. With total assets of $204.6M against total liabilities of $136.5M, HCKT shows a solid equity base of $68.1M. However, its cash flow metrics reveal a concerning trend, with $0 in both operating cash flow and free cash flow. Despite stable dividend payments of $0.12 per share distributed quarterly, the stock has seen a significant decline, with a 1-year change of -55.86%. While dividend payments provide some return, the sharp decrease in stock price indicates substantial shareholder losses. This concern is further compounded by a relatively high net debt of $61.3M, suggesting moderate leverage. Overall, the company presents a mixed picture with growth potential but currently faces significant market challenges."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

Moderate revenue growth, but trend requires more data.

Profitability

Fair

Profitability is reasonable with a positive net income.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Zero operating and free cash flow signals a warning.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Caution

Moderate leverage indicated by net debt; needs attention.

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

Significant negative price appreciation offsets dividends.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

Valuation shows potential upside, but significant risks persist.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

So What?: Management delivered Q4 2025 results cleanly—$74.8M revenue before reimbursements and adjusted EPS of $0.40, both at/above the high end of guidance—while reiterating the GenAI platform shift as the path to higher margins. However, the Q&A and prepared remarks reveal the operational bridge is still being built: AI transition charges of ~$1.0M–$1.5M in Q1 2026 (with possible continuation) and a meaningful tax lift (26.3% vs 20.1%, ~+$0.04 EPS drag) offset optimism. In parallel, the analyst-relevant narrative is productivity and commercialization timing rather than pure demand: management claims productivity improvements “in excess of 25%” from XT and expects ServiceNow’s pilot to launch before month-end, while a broader international partner agreement is not yet signed (announcement expected intra-quarter). Net: optimistic about platform/partner momentum and licensing structure, but near-term EPS and margin durability remain constrained by identifiable transition costs and tax headwinds.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Licensable AI XPLR v5 (post LeewayHertz integration) to enable recurring/ongoing value beyond one-off consulting engagements
  • Productivity improvements from XT (transformation roadmaps/operational modeling) and AIX/AIXelerator (implementation enablement)
  • AIX platform used in Oracle delivery to drive delivery productivity improvements
  • Ask Hackett AI rollout (executive applied intelligence programs) leveraging Hackett benchmarking/IP

Business Development

  • Global technology and consulting company: ~6-month demonstration/testing of AI XPLR; management expects to finalize and launch a global go-to-market collaboration agreement and announce 'first client shortly'
  • ServiceNow: go-to-market pilot initiative targeted to launch before end of the month (Q&A called out as a pre–month-end launch objective)
  • Celonis: management highlighted ability to ingest process mining/process execution detail into AI XPLR (for faster transformation ideation/solutioning)
  • LeewayHertz acquisition (expanded AI XPLR solution design module; referenced as a key enabler for partner credibility and capability)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Q4 2025 revenues before reimbursements: $74.8M, above the high end of guidance
  • Q4 2025 adjusted EPS: $0.40, at the high end of guidance
  • Q4 2025 reimbursable expense ratio: 1.2% (vs 1.3% prior quarter; 2.3% prior-year quarter)
  • Segment: Global S&BT revenues before reimbursements: $38.6M (down 11% YoY)
  • Segment: Oracle Solutions revenues before reimbursements: $14.0M (down 20% YoY)
  • Segment: SAP Solutions revenues before reimbursements: $22.2M (up 32% YoY), driven by software-related sales + implementation fees tied to S/4HANA cloud migrations
  • Adjusted gross margin (Q4 2025): 46.6% (vs 47.7% prior year; -110 bps YoY)
  • Adjusted EBITDA margin (Q4 2025): 21.3% (vs 25.2% prior year; -390 bps YoY)
  • Q1 2026 revenue guidance (revenues before reimbursements): $70.5M to $72.0M
  • Q1 2026 EPS (adjusted diluted): $0.34 to $0.36
  • Q1 2026 gross margin guide (adjusted, %): ~44% to 45%
  • Q1 2026 AI transition charges: ~$1.0M to $1.5M (severance/headcount reductions + leverage of AI delivery platforms); may continue through 2026 (excluded from adjusted results)
  • Q1 2026 tax headwind: assumed GAAP effective tax rate on adjusted earnings 26.3% vs 20.1% in prior-year Q1 (+~$0.04 EPS unfavorable)

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Q4 2025 share repurchase: repurchased 2.1M shares at avg ~$20.30/share; total cost ~$42M (includes tender + employee tax withholding)
  • Tender offer funding: borrowed net $32M from credit facility
  • Remaining repurchase authorization at quarter-end: $11.4M; Board increased authorization by $13.6M to bring total to $25.0M (post quarter-end)
  • Cash balances: $18.2M at 12/31/2025 (vs $13.9M prior quarter)
  • Outstanding debt: $76M at end of Q4 2025
  • Dividend declared: $0.12/share (record 3/20/2026; payable 4/3/2026)

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Transition to GenAI-enabled delivery platforms (labor-based to labor-led supported by GenAI platforms) emphasized as margin expansion driver
  • Operational/productivity improvements: management cited productivity gains 'in excess of 25%' from XT engagements (Q&A)
  • Licensing approach: platform is not 'free'; clients exposed to platform during engagements, then decide to license ideation explorer module and/or solutioning module (version 5 licensable; expected licensing to ramp 'throughout the year')
  • Management stated shift from quoting rates to quoting outcomes/deliverables (financial model transition described as per-RFP deliverable pass/completion fee)

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Q1 2026 revenue before reimbursements: $70.5M–$72.0M (sequential up expected; mixed YoY by segment: Global S&BT and Oracle down YoY; SAP up YoY)
  • Q1 2026 expects: gross margin up YoY and sequentially; adjusted EBITDA margin 19.5%–20.5%
  • Q1 2026 adjusted SG&A + interest expense: ~ $20.0M
  • ServiceNow go-to-market pilot: targeted launch 'before the end of the month' (per Q&A)

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Near-term profitability pressure from AI transition charges: ~$1.0M–$1.5M in Q1 2026 (severance/headcount reductions + AI delivery platform leverage), with potential for continued charges through 2026
  • Tax headwind in Q1 2026: effective tax rate on adjusted earnings 26.3% vs 20.1% prior-year quarter (+~$0.04 EPS)
  • Demand/segment softness: Global S&BT down 11% YoY and Oracle down 20% YoY (though sequentially improving expected for Q1)
  • Margin compression observed YoY in Q4: adjusted gross margin 46.6% vs 47.7% prior year (-110 bps) and adjusted EBITDA margin 21.3% vs 25.2% prior year (-390 bps)
  • Execution risk in licensing rollout: management expects to begin licensing as product progresses through the year; timing/uptake not yet quantified

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the HCKT Q4 2025 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (HCKT)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — The Hackett Group, Inc. (HCKT) Financial Profile