
Kronos Worldwide, Inc. (KRO) Market Cap
Kronos Worldwide, Inc. has a market capitalization of $727.1M.
Financials based on reported quarter end 2025-12-31
Price: $6.32
βΌ -0.01 (-0.16%)
Market Cap: 727.14M
NYSE Β· time unavailable
CEO: Brian W. Christian
Sector: Basic Materials
Industry: Chemicals - Specialty
IPO Date: 2003-12-09
Website: https://kronostio2.com
Kronos Worldwide, Inc. (KRO) - Company Information
Market Cap: 727.14M Β· Sector: Basic Materials
Kronos Worldwide, Inc. produces and markets titanium dioxide pigments (TiO2) in Europe, North America, the Asia Pacific, and internationally. The company produces TiO2 in two crystalline forms, rutile and anatase to impart whiteness, brightness, opacity, and durability for various products, including paints, coatings, plastics, paper, fibers, and ceramics, as well as for various specialty products, such as inks, foods, and cosmetics. It also produces ilmenite, a raw material used directly as a feedstock by sulfate-process TiO2 plants; iron-based chemicals, which are used as treatment and conditioning agents for industrial effluents and municipal wastewater, as well as in the manufacture of iron pigments, cement, and agricultural products; specialty chemicals for use in the formulation of pearlescent pigments, and production of electroceramic capacitors for cell phones and other electronic devices, as well as for use in pearlescent pigments, natural gas pipe, and other specialty applications. In addition, the company provides technical services for its products. It sells its products under the KRONOS brand through agents and distributors to paint, plastics, decorative laminate, and paper manufacturers. The company was founded in 1916 and is headquartered in Dallas, Texas. Kronos Worldwide, Inc. operates as a subsidiary of Valhi, Inc.
Analyst Sentiment
Based on 2 ratings
Analyst 1Y Forecast: $5.50
Average target (based on 1 sources)
Consensus Price Target
Low
$5
Median
$5
High
$5
Average
$5
Downside: -20.9%
Price & Moving Averages
Related Companies in Basic Materials

KOPPERS HOLDINGS INC (KOP)
Basic Materials
$0.74B
Mkt Cap

METALLUS INC (MTUS)
Basic Materials
$0.75B
Mkt Cap

RAYONIER ADVANCED MATERIALS INC (RYAM)
Basic Materials
$0.69B
Mkt Cap

IDAHO STRATEGIC RESOURCES INC (IDR)
Basic Materials
$0.68B
Mkt Cap

DAKOTA GOLD CORP (DC)
Basic Materials
$0.82B
Mkt Cap

FERROGLOBE PLC (GSM)
Basic Materials
$0.84B
Mkt Cap
Fundamentals Overview
π AI Financial Analysis
Powered by StockMarketInfo"KRO reported revenue of $418.3M for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025. The company incurred a net loss of $82.8M, resulting in an EPS of -$0.72. Operating cash flow was positive at $92.1M, and free cash flow stood at $81.9M, though capital expenditures slightly affected the operational balance. Despite the counter effects of elevated debt levels, KRO has positive total equity of $751.1M against total liabilities of $1.0657B. Shareholder returns have been supported by consistent dividends of $0.05 per share, issued quarterly, although recent market performance reveals a steep decline of nearly 21% over the past year, contrasted by a strong year-to-date increase of approximately 38%. Investors might remain cautious due to the negative net income and lack of substantial price appreciation over the past year."
Revenue Growth
Moderate revenue, reflecting stable operational performance.
Profitability
Negative net income points to challenges in achieving profitability.
Cash Flow Quality
Positive operating cash flow and free cash flow indicate solid cash generation.
Leverage & Balance Sheet
Manageable debt levels, but reliance on debt financing remains a concern.
Shareholder Returns
Consistent dividend issuance partially compensates for poor price performance.
Analyst Sentiment & Valuation
Stagnant price with weak analyst sentiment, potential upside indicated by stable price targets.
Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.
Management framed Q2 results as βsolid,β but the hard numbers show a margin squeeze from sharply higher ore/feedstock costs and lower volumes. Segment profit fell to $114.2M from $146.6M despite average TiO2 prices up 24% YoY. The company reduced production to ~86% utilization to pull inventory down, with full-year utilization guided to 90%β95%. The key operational hurdle is cost: management reiterated per-ton production cost for tons produced in 2012 is +50% to +60% vs 2011, driven by ore (+$90M in the quarter YoY; +$117M YTD). In Q&A, analysts pressed for sequencing and P&L mechanics: management clarified that the 50%β60% guidance applies to produced tons (not what hit the income statement), and that most low-cost inventory was consumed in Q1. On demand/pricing, management argued Q3βQ4 pricing should remain substantially above 2011, but admitted outcome depends on the extent of second-half demand pickup and inventory restocking.
Growth Catalysts
- Demand stabilization expectations in Northern Europe (management cited Northern vs Southern Europe sales mix)
- Inventory restocking expected toward end of year (producer and customer inventories trending down)
Business Development
Financial Highlights
- Segment profit (operating income) $114.2M vs $146.6M in Q2 2011 (down despite higher prices)
- Average TiO2 selling prices: +24% YoY in Q2 2012; +28% YoY for first six months 2012
- Sales volume: 123,000 metric tons in Q2 2012 (-16% YoY); 253,000 metric tons first half 2012 (-7% YoY)
- Production volume: 118,000 metric tons in Q2 2012 (-17% YoY); 258,000 metric tons first half 2012 (-6% YoY)
- Production rate: reduced to ~86% of practical capacity utilization in Q2; full-year expected 90% to 95%
- Raw material/ore costs increased ~$90M in the quarter YoY and ~$117M YTD YoY
- Company expects per-metric-ton TiO2 production cost to increase ~50% to 60% vs 2011 (specifically for tons produced in 2012)
- Net income: $64.5M or $0.56 diluted EPS vs $89.0M or $0.77 in Q2 2011
- Debt actions: new $400M term loan in June 2012; redeemed remaining $279M principal of 6.5% Senior Secured Notes
- Early debt extinguishment charge: $7.2M pretax in Q2 2012 (~$0.04 diluted EPS after tax)
- EBITDA: ~$125M in Q2 2012 vs ~$158M in Q2 2011
Capital Funding
- June 2012: entered into new $400M term loan; used proceeds to redeem $279M principal of 6.5% Senior Secured Notes due April 2013
- June 2012: entered into new $125M North American revolving credit facility (full amount available for borrowing by end of June/quarter)
- Interest expense: $6.7M in Q2 2012 vs $8.5M in Q2 2011 (-$1.8M)
Strategy & Ops
- Reduced production to align inventories with demand; Q2 production at ~86% practical utilization to drive inventory down
- Expect inventory reductions to continue in H2 (inventory already moving down sequentially from Q1 to Q2)
- Ore mix optimization: chloride plants adjusted mix based on availability/cost; expect higher slag mix vs rutile/synthetic rutile in 2012
- Operating/production disruption logic tied to demand and inventory rather than FX/schedule changes
Market Outlook
- Full-year 2012 operating rate guidance: ~90% to 95% of practical capacity utilization
- Demand outlook: expectation of some pickup in second half 2012 vs first half 2012 (Europe/Northern Europe cited)
- Inventory/supply outlook: producer and customer inventories trending down; management expects restocking toward end of year
- Price outlook (near-term): Q3 and Q4 2012 prices expected βsubstantially higherβ than comparable 2011 quarters; high likelihood of demand pickup around end of Q3/beginning of Q4 stabilizing prices and possibly driving an up-tick
Risks & Headwinds
- TiO2 demand weakness in Europe and certain export markets; management cited lower customer demand leading to lower sales volumes in Q2 and first half
- Feedstock ore cost surge: production costs up (per ton production cost +50% to +60% for 2012 tons produced)
- Near-term availability/shortage dynamics: expect intermittent periods of TiO2 availability and shortage
- Inventory/production management challenge: finished goods inventory levels and inventory cost/working capital effects were a key constraint (management discussed elevated inventory cost levels built using lower-cost ore in 2011)
- Competitor guidance risk: question referenced some competitors expecting price declines in back half; management maintained pricing stabilization/up-tick likelihood based on demand pickup
Sentiment: CAUTIOUS
Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the KRO Q2 2012 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.