Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited

Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) Market Cap

Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited has a market capitalization of $2.31B, based on the latest available market data.

Financials updated on 2025-12-31

SectorConsumer Cyclical
IndustryGambling, Resorts & Casinos
Employees21784
ExchangeNASDAQ Global Select

Price: $5.68

-0.09 (-1.56%)

Market Cap: 2.31B

NASDAQ · time unavailable

CEO: Yau Lung

Sector: Consumer Cyclical

Industry: Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

IPO Date: 2006-12-19

Website: https://www.melco-resorts.com

Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) - Company Information

Market Cap: 2.31B · Sector: Consumer Cyclical

Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited develops, owns, and operates casino gaming and resort facilities in Asia and Europe. It owns and operates City of Dreams, an integrated casino resort that has approximately 511 gaming tables and 572 gaming machines; approximately 770 rooms, and suites and villas; approximately 25 restaurants and bars, and 165 retail outlets; and health and fitness clubs, three swimming pools, spa and salons, and banquet and meeting facilities. The company also operates Altira Macau, a casino hotel, which has approximately 101 gaming tables and 121 gaming machines; 230 hotel rooms; various dining and casual restaurants, and recreation and leisure facilities; and various non-gaming amenities comprising a spa, gymnasium, outdoor garden podium, and sky terrace lounge. In addition, it operates Studio City, a cinematically themed integrated resort with gaming facilities, hotel, entertainment, retail, and food and beverage outlets that comprises 290 gaming tables and 645 gaming machines in Cotai, Macau. Further, the company owns and operates seven Mocha Clubs with 813 gaming machines, as well as Grand Dragon casino in Taipa Island, Macau. Additionally, it operates and manages City of Dreams Manila, an integrated resort in the Entertainment City complex in Manila; a casino in Limassol and three satellite casinos in Nicosia, Ayia Napa, and Paphos in Cyprus. The company was formerly known as Melco Crown Entertainment Limited and changed its name to Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited in April 2017. The company was incorporated in 2004 and is headquartered in Central, Hong Kong. Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited is a subsidiary of Melco Leisure and Entertainment Group Limited.

Analyst ratings pending...

Consensus Price Target

No data available

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only. Please validate all data using official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📘 Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) is an integrated gaming and leisure operator with a core footprint in Macau and an evolving presence in the broader Asia-Pacific gaming and entertainment ecosystem. The company’s model combines destination resort development with gaming operations, hospitality amenities, and curated non-gaming attractions. Revenue is generated primarily through mass-market gaming play, premium gaming (including VIP and other high-roller segments), hotel operations, and ancillary spend across food and beverage, retail, entertainment, and related services.

The business model is structurally characterized by (1) capital-intensive resort development, (2) multi-channel monetisation (gaming and non-gaming), and (3) operational execution that links marketing distribution, customer experience, and property-level economics. MLCO also benefits from a degree of flexibility in how it allocates resources across properties and market segments, enabling it to respond to changing demand patterns and competitive dynamics.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

MLCO’s monetisation is anchored in gaming, which typically represents the majority of operating revenue due to the scale and customer lifetime value of casino play. Within gaming, the economics differ by segment: mass-market gaming is generally more volume-driven, while premium gaming can be more sensitive to player profiles and liquidity, and often relies on a network of relationships and incentives.

Beyond gaming, the company monetises non-gaming spend through lodging and integrated resort offerings. Hotel revenue is influenced by occupancy, ADR (average daily rate), and length-of-stay patterns. F&B, entertainment, retail, and events contribute incremental margin and improve customer stickiness, particularly when resorts are positioned as “destination” properties rather than purely gaming facilities.

A key feature of MLCO’s model is the integration of the gaming floor experience with hospitality and leisure infrastructure. Well-designed resorts can reduce customer friction—improving dwell time and conversion of gaming customers into repeat consumers of ancillary services. In addition, the company’s marketing strategy and distribution relationships can materially influence mix, visitation, and conversion across segments.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

MLCO’s competitive position derives from its resort-centric approach, brand and property standards, and ability to operate large-scale entertainment venues in a tightly regulated jurisdiction. In Macau’s competitive landscape, differentiation often comes from property quality, capacity management, product refresh cycles, and the ability to attract both premium and mass customers through experience-led offerings.

From a positioning standpoint, MLCO tends to emphasize integrated resort capabilities—leveraging hotel capacity, dining, entertainment, and customer journey design to support higher-value visitation. The company’s long-term property investment thesis supports an operational narrative of maintaining and upgrading guest experience, which can be a differentiator when demand normalises after cyclical fluctuations.

Operationally, MLCO’s advantage is also linked to its scale within Macau relative to many peers, enabling cross-functional capabilities in surveillance, hospitality operations, marketing execution, and cost management. When demand shifts, large operators can re-balance programming, promotional strategies, and staffing more efficiently than smaller or single-property operators.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Growth for MLCO is best understood as a combination of (1) cyclical recovery in gaming demand, (2) structural improvements in non-gaming contribution, and (3) long-duration development and re-investment opportunities that support property differentiation.

1) Demand and mix normalisation
Gaming revenues in Macau typically respond to macro travel patterns, visitation trends, and regulatory or competitive shifts. Over a multi-year horizon, improvements in destination appeal and travel demand can lift both mass and premium contribution. Even when total visitation growth is modest, changes in mix—such as premium visitation share or incremental spend by existing patrons—can meaningfully affect revenue per customer.

2) Non-gaming expansion as a stabiliser
Integrated resort operators that broaden the customer proposition can smooth earnings volatility because non-gaming revenue can benefit from broader consumer motivations beyond casino play. Enhancements in hotel offerings, dining, and entertainment programming can increase occupancy and improve monetisation of the “stay” component of the customer journey.

3) Capex-led product and capacity refinement
MLCO’s business has a natural link between capital allocation and long-run competitiveness. Multi-year resort upgrades and refresh initiatives can improve guest satisfaction, maintain brand equity, and support higher-margin activity. While capital intensity is meaningful, sustained investment can also protect market share and sustain pricing power in hotel and premium experiences.

4) Distribution, marketing, and relationship management
In premium gaming, the ability to manage relationships and incentives remains central to revenue quality. Across segments, marketing execution affects conversion from inquiry to visit and from visit to repeat play. Over time, improving distribution efficiency and enhancing loyalty mechanisms can lift effective yield per patron.

5) Potential geographic and strategic optionality
MLCO’s enterprise includes opportunities beyond its core, with strategic optionality tied to real estate development and brand extension. Any incremental contribution from new venues or new initiatives would be evaluated through return on invested capital, margin accretion, and operational scalability.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

Investors should evaluate MLCO’s risk profile across regulatory, competitive, financial, and execution dimensions. The key risks are not limited to near-term factors; several are embedded in the industry structure.

1) Macau regulatory and policy environment
Gaming is heavily regulated, and policy decisions can influence market access, competitive conditions, taxation, and operating constraints. Changes in licensing rules, compliance expectations, or concession frameworks can affect revenue dynamics and cost structures.

2) Competitive intensity among integrated resorts
Macau’s resort landscape is dynamic. Competitive responses—such as capex investment by peers, incentive structures, and product refresh cycles—can impact pricing power and market share. Sustained differentiation is required to avoid erosion in mass conversion and premium share.

3) Cyclical exposure to visitation and consumer sentiment
Gaming demand is sensitive to travel flows, macroeconomic conditions, and consumer discretionary spending. Even strong property positioning cannot fully decouple results from travel and regional tourism cycles.

4) VIP/premium volatility and mix sensitivity
Premium segments can be meaningfully affected by player behavior, risk appetite, and the distribution landscape. Revenue can fluctuate if VIP mix changes or if incentive economics shift across the industry.

5) Capital intensity and leverage considerations
Integrated resort models require sustained capital expenditure. If capex needs expand beyond initial expectations or if refinancing conditions deteriorate, leverage and liquidity could become constraints. Investors should monitor debt maturity profile, interest rate sensitivity, and operating cash flow conversion.

6) Execution risk on property development and upgrades
Construction timelines, regulatory approvals, and operational readiness can influence revenue timing and costs. Delays or cost overruns reduce near-term returns and can affect customer perception.

7) Reputation, compliance, and operational integrity
Large entertainment venues face heightened compliance requirements and reputational risks. Operational incidents, compliance failures, or security/surveillance challenges can lead to penalties, incremental costs, and demand impacts.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Valuation for MLCO is typically best anchored to the durability of cash generation, the operating leverage embedded in high fixed-cost resort structures, and the market’s assumptions around gaming demand and non-gaming contribution. Because the business is asset-heavy, equity valuation often reflects both expected earnings power and capital allocation discipline.

Key valuation frameworks include:

  • EV/EBITDA and operating cash flow multiples: useful for comparing earnings power across casino operators, while remaining sensitive to cycle assumptions and one-off items.
  • Sum-of-the-parts logic: can be appropriate if investors treat different properties and segments as distinct earning engines with different margin profiles and growth trajectories.
  • Cash flow yield and reinvestment efficiency: integrated resort returns should be assessed alongside capital spending needs and maintenance capex versus growth capex.

In a market view context, MLCO’s equity tends to track the market’s confidence in (1) gaming demand stabilisation and recovery, (2) sustainable property competitiveness, and (3) improved mix toward non-gaming or higher-yield experiences. Investors generally require a clear path to earnings normalisation and a credible framework for capital deployment that preserves the ability to absorb cycles.

A balanced assessment would weigh upside from destination development and stable or improving monetisation per visitor against downside from regulatory shifts, competitive dilution, and the potential for weaker-than-expected cash conversion during softer demand environments.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

MLCO is an integrated resort operator with a revenue model dominated by gaming, complemented by hospitality and non-gaming monetisation that can enhance resilience when executed effectively. The company’s medium- to long-term opportunity set is driven by property competitiveness, product refresh cycles, and the ability to translate destination appeal into sustained visitation and ancillary spend.

From an investment perspective, MLCO is best viewed through a fundamentals lens that considers cash flow durability, operating leverage through the cycle, and disciplined capital allocation. The principal risks revolve around the regulatory framework in Macau, competitive pressures, and cyclical demand sensitivity—alongside execution and balance-sheet considerations given the capital intensity of resort operations.

For investors seeking exposure to Asia-Pacific integrated resort dynamics, MLCO’s valuation and expected returns should be assessed against assumptions for demand normalisation, mix improvement, and credible cash generation after capex. Upside is typically associated with stronger-than-expected property economics and gradual improvement in non-gaming contribution, while downside emerges from policy shocks, competitive erosion, or prolonged visitation headwinds.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

Management’s tone is constructive—Macau is leveraging higher GGR (+24% YoY market) and non-gaming activation (House of Dancing Water) with strong EBITDA growth (full-year Macau EBITDA +25% YoY). They also provide clear cost/margin framing: Q4 OpEx was distorted by events (and incremental marketing), with Macau OpEx ~ $3.1M/day excluding those items, versus an outlook of ~$3.2M/day in 2026 excluding House of Dancing Water. However, the Q&A adds pressure points: they cannot “scientifically” attribute non-gaming show traffic to gaming conversion, and they cite $5M of additional bad debt in the quarter from a settlement with a prior junket operator (normalization expected, but it’s a real hit). On competition, management explicitly says they see no near-term easing and no “ratchet up” in gaming-program spend—yet that also implies limited upside from reduced promotional intensity. Capex is guided at $450M with a $100M Countdown Hotel push in 2026.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • House of Dancing Water reopened in May: meaningful uptick in property visitation; show runs ~twice/day for 5 days/week; ~1,800–1,900 attendees per show
  • Macau outperformance: Q4 Macau property EBITDA +24% YoY; full-year Macau property EBITDA +25% YoY
  • 2026 early momentum: Macau market GGR +24% YoY and management cites market share gains so far in 2026
  • Chinese New Year outlook: higher-yielding cash ADRs vs 2025

Business Development

  • Renovated Countdown Hotel (largest 2026 initiative) with progressively starting openings in 2026
  • Retail revamp at COD (City of Dreams) and plans to upgrade F&B offerings in Macau
  • Programming/activation via House of Dancing Water as a non-gaming traffic driver

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Full-year 2025 group property EBITDA: $1.4B (+17% YoY)
  • Full-year 2025 adjusted property EBITDA: ~$331M (+12% YoY); adjusted for VIP hold ~$323M
  • VIP-related win rate tailwinds: COD Macau +~$7M property EBITDA and COD Manila +~$3M
  • Macau OpEx drivers in Q4: additional event-driven OpEx; excluding events (and House of Dancing Water) Macau OpEx ~ $3.1M/day in Q4
  • Macau bad debt provisions: ~$5M for the quarter; expected to normalize going forward
  • Macau OpEx outlook for 2026: excluding House of Dancing Water ~$3.2M/day (assumes increased marketing activity for Chinese New Year + new brand campaigns)
  • Macau property EBITDA margin (2025): would have been over 27% on an actual basis excluding event-driven costs
  • Trademark license fee terms: fee increases from 1.0% (2025) to 1.5% of City of Dreams Macau gross revenues (excl. Grand Hyatt) from 2026; full-year 2025 license fees ~ $33M

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Liquidity: available liquidity ~ $2.4B; consolidated cash on hand ~ $1.2B as of 2025
  • Debt reduction in 2025: redeemed remaining $358M senior notes due 2026; repaid $210M debt at Melco and $32M at Studio City; total paid down ~ $400M in 2025
  • Early 2026 debt repayment: $35M in January and additional $25M this month
  • No material debt maturities in 2026
  • 2026 CapEx guidance: total $450M (includes carry-forward from 2025 into 2026)

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • House of Dancing Water monetization: management sees uplift in F&B during show and after; mass drop showed decent uptick post-May vs pre-May; direct scientific attribution to gaming is limited
  • Competitive stance in Macau: management claims no ratchet up in gaming-program spend entering the quarter; will be disciplined and not lead the market up
  • OpEx management: cost discipline emphasized; ongoing across 2026

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Macau daily OpEx (2026 outlook, excluding House of Dancing Water): ~ $3.2M/day
  • CapEx by region (2026): Macau ~ $375M; Manila ~ $35M–$40M; Cyprus ~ $35M–$40M
  • Countdown Hotel: ~$100M CapEx for 2026

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Macau competition remains intense; management expects this level for rest of 2026 and does not see near-term relief or catalyst to reduce competition intensity
  • Non-gaming to gaming conversion uncertainty: small share of show attendees go directly to gaming; hard to track repeat conversion scientifically (repeat visits over time, but no direct formula)
  • Event-driven and credit-related volatility: Q4 included bad debt provisions (~$5M) tied to settlement with a previous junket operator; normalization expected but is a near-term earnings headwind
  • OpEx in Q4 was boosted by events (China National Games, Studio City 10th anniversary, Macau Grand Prix) and requires normalization assumptions for margin comparison

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the MLCO Q4 2025 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

🧾 Full Earnings Call Transcript

Ticker: MLCO

Quarter: Q4 2025

Date: 2026-02-12 08:30:00

Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in the fourth quarter 2025 earnings conference call of Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited. After the call, we will conduct a question and answer session. Today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to Jeanny Kim, Senior Vice President and Group Treasurer of Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited. Please go ahead.

Jeanny Kim: Thank you, Operator, and thank you all for joining us today for our fourth quarter 2025 earnings call. On the call are Lawrence Ho, Geoffrey Stuart Davis, Evan Andrew Winkler, and our property presidents in Macau, Manila, and Cyprus. Before we get started, please note that today's discussion may contain forward-looking statements made under the Safe Harbor provision of federal securities laws. Our actual results could differ from our anticipated results. In addition, we may discuss non-GAAP measures. A definition and reconciliation of each of these measures to the most comparable GAAP financial measures are included in the earnings release. Finally, please note that our supplementary earnings slides are posted on our investor website at investors.melco-resorts.com. With that, I will turn the call over to Lawrence Ho.

Lawrence Ho: Thank you, Jeanny, and thank you all for joining us today. 2025 was a year of growth and recovery supported by disciplined cost management and margin expansion. We recorded $1.4 billion in group property EBITDA for the full year of 2025, growing by 17% compared to 2024. In Macau, our dedicated efforts to enhance the customer experience have proven to be a strategic focus, with fourth quarter Macau property EBITDA growing 24% year over year and full year Macau property EBITDA growing 25% compared to 2024. We have had a strong start to 2026 with Macau market GGR up by 24% year over year and our market share increasing so far in 2026. Chinese New Year looks strong, with higher-yielding cash ADRs compared to 2025. We have a pipeline of new initiatives that we are planning to implement in 2026 to further differentiate our offerings, with the largest project being the opening of the renovated Countdown Hotel. We are on track to progressively start opening in 2026. The completed hotel is expected to introduce a truly distinctive experience and set a new benchmark in Macau. We have also started on a revamp of the retail area at COD and have plans to upgrade our F&B offerings, continuing to further enhance our product quality. In the Philippines, competitive pressures and industry headwinds continued to impact our performance in 2025. However, we are encouraged by the positive developments in that market, including visa-free travel for Chinese nationals, upgrades to the Manila Airport to facilitate increasing international tourism, and rationalization of the online gaming market. We have also concluded our evaluation of the strategic alternatives for COD Manila. Although we considered various alternatives, we did not feel that any of those options would allow the value and potential of the property to be fully realized. We are confident that business will rebound and we may reevaluate the situation in the future. Moving on to Cyprus, City of Dreams Mediterranean and the satellite casinos in Cyprus achieved 78% year-over-year growth in property EBITDA to $21 million for 2025, despite seasonality typically being slower in these months. And finally, in Sri Lanka, we continue to focus our efforts to progressively ramp up operations and have seen promising green shoots so far in 2026. With that, I will turn the call over to Geoff.

Geoffrey Stuart Davis: Thank you, Lawrence. Our group-wide adjusted property EBITDA for 2025 grew 12% year over year to approximately $331 million. Adjusted for VIP hold, our property EBITDA was approximately $323 million. Favorable win rates at COD Macau and COD Manila had positive impacts on our property EBITDA by approximately $7 million and $3 million, respectively. We had guided in the prior quarterly call that OpEx in Macau increased in the fourth quarter compared to the prior quarter, primarily due to events including the China National Games, Studio City's tenth anniversary, and the Macau Grand Prix. Excluding these fourth quarter events as well as House of Dancing Water, Macau OpEx was approximately $3.1 million per day. EBITDA in 2025 was also impacted by additional bad debt provisions that were taken as a result of a settlement that we reached with one of the previous junket operators. Adjusting for these event-driven costs, Macau's property EBITDA margin for 2025 would have been over 27% on an actual basis. Looking forward to 2026, we expect Macau daily OpEx excluding House of Dancing Water to come in at approximately $3.2 million given increased marketing activity around Chinese New Year and new brand campaigns across our Macau properties. Turning to our balance sheet, our liquidity position remains robust. We had available liquidity of approximately $2.4 billion with consolidated cash on hand of approximately $1.2 billion as of 2025. Melco, excluding its operations at Studio City, the Philippines, Cyprus, and Sri Lanka, accounted for approximately $550 million of the consolidated cash on hand. In 2025, Melco redeemed the remaining $358 million of the senior notes due 2026. In addition, we repaid $210 million in debt at Melco and $32 million at Studio City. In total, the Melco Group paid down approximately $400 million of debt over the course of 2025, and we continue to reduce debt in 2026. Melco has repaid $35 million in debt in January and will repay a further $25 million this month. The group does not have any material amount of debt maturing in 2026. Before we move on to the non-operating line items, we thought it would be helpful to take a few minutes to provide information on the trademarks license agreement with Melco International. Melco International owns and manages certain trademarks utilized by Melco Resorts and its operations. The terms of the trademark license agreement were negotiated on an arm's length basis, factoring in the ranges of fees typically observed in the industry. The agreement has an initial term of ten years, which commenced on 01/01/2024, and thereafter is automatically renewed for consecutive periods of twelve months unless either party gives prior notice of nonrenewal. Under the agreement, the trademark license fee payable is up to 1.5% of the gross revenues of City of Dreams Macau, excluding Grand Hyatt, unless agreed otherwise by the parties to the agreement. The trademark license fee was 1% in 2025 and will increase to 1.5% from 2026. The agreement does not include an annual cap, but the total fees for the full year of 2025 amounted to approximately $33 million, dramatically lower than those of our peers. The trademarks owned by Melco International are integral to the long-term strategy and brand identity of Melco Resorts, and the formalized agreement facilitates a standard approach as we continue to grow and expand the portfolio. And finally, as we normally do, we will give you some guidance on non-operating line items for the upcoming 2026. Total depreciation and amortization expense is expected to be approximately $140 million to $145 million. Corporate expense is expected to come in at approximately $35 million. And consolidated net interest expense is expected to be approximately $115 million to $120 million. This includes finance liability interest of around $6 million relating to fees payable in relation to the Macau gaming concession and the Cyprus gaming license, and finance lease interest of approximately $5 million relating to City of Dreams Manila. That concludes our prepared remarks. Operator, back to you for the Q&A.

Operator: Thank you. If you wish to ask a question, please press 1 on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. If you wish to cancel your request, please press 2. If you are on a speakerphone, please pick up the handset to ask your questions. We do ask that you please limit yourself to one question. We will now open for questions. Today's first question comes from Joseph Robert Stauff at Susquehanna. Please go ahead.

Joseph Robert Stauff: Thank you. Good morning. I wanted to ask about the additional traffic obviously being generated by House of Dancing Water and where you are with respect to being able to convert that additional daily visitation into both gaming and, obviously, other parts of your business. What is the opportunity from here as we think about that?

Lawrence Ho: Hi, Joe. It is Lawrence. Since we reopened House of Dancing Water in May, we have seen meaningful uptick in property visitation. The show is open pretty much twice a day for five days of the week, and during those shows, 1,800 to 1,900 people attend. So that drives additional headcount into the property. I think we are seeing meaningfully good spend across non-gaming during and after the show. And even on our mass drop, from pre-May to post-May, we have seen a decent uptick. As with any non-gaming entertainment, concerts, attractions in Macau, how can we directly track that scientifically? I do not think we have an answer for that. I will maybe let Evan talk about it. But I think overall, we see it driving traffic and energy into the building and it is a little more, as Lawrence has pointed out, a little more difficult from a direct drive standpoint.

Evan Andrew Winkler: It is very helpful in activating the property. We do see a big uptick, obviously, in food and beverage spending on property during the show. Generally, when people are coming from outside the property to the show for that initial event, sometimes they are coming with family and friends, so a very small percentage go from that directly to gaming. The benefit we have is it does introduce thousands of more people with each show to the property and to COD, to our product, to food and beverage. And so I think over time, it is generating repeat visits back to the property, but it is hard to go from who exited the show that day to who comes back later on. So I think we drive, but we do not have a direct formula that we can give you. Because if you look at the individual people coming out of the show on the night that they go to see the show, that is not a high number. But overall, we are seeing uplift in the business.

Joseph Robert Stauff: Okay. Understand. Thanks, Lawrence. Evan, thank you.

Operator: Our next question today comes from Timothy Chao at Citigroup. Please go ahead.

Timothy Chao: Hi, management.

Lawrence Ho: Excuse me. Can I listen? Can you hear me clearly, please?

Timothy Chao: Yes, we can hear you. Alright. Hi. Sorry. So question for me. What is your view on the competitive intensity in Macau? And more specifically, what are your expectations on your EBITDA margins, particularly in Macau this year, please? Thank you.

Lawrence Ho: Hey, Timothy. It is Lawrence. Maybe I will start, and then I will hand it over to Evan and Geoff. I think the competition is still very intense in Macau, but that can be expected. I would say that we anticipate this level of competition to be what we will expect for the rest of the year. In terms of mass, it is still growing, so we are comfortable with our margin. We have been very disciplined throughout 2025 in terms of our reinvestment. We have seen some of our competitors ratchet it up throughout the year. I think we are, unless there is anything more to supplement other than—

Evan Andrew Winkler: From where we are sitting coming out of Q4 and into this quarter, we are not seeing a ratchet up in terms of levels of spend directly on gaming programs from where we are now. Competition remains, as Lawrence said, intense within the marketplace. We are not looking at any catalyst that would immediately bring that down. The hope that we always have is, as people look at things, that you have easing up among players. As Lawrence has said and I have said in the past, we do not ever drive up in the marketplace. We tend to be very disciplined. We will make strategic moves at times when we need to look at market share or move around with individual segments. But we certainly would never lead the market up. Based on what we are seeing now, I think we are stable. I do not see anything that will bring us down in the near term, but I also do not see anything that will ratchet it up.

Lawrence Ho: On margin, we have done a pretty good job in terms of managing our operating costs throughout 2025. That is part of the company philosophy as well. You will see that ongoing throughout 2026.

Timothy Chao: Thank you so much. Thank you for the color.

Operator: Thank you. Our next question today comes from D.S. Kim at JPMorgan. Please go ahead.

D.S. Kim: Hi, everyone. Good evening, and Happy New Year. My first question is regarding the operating expense. As Geoff mentioned earlier, I think we had quite a bit of nonrecurring items this quarter—ten-year anniversary, National Games, and even junket-related bad debt. Can you help quantifying each of these in dollar terms for us, if it is possible? And can I confirm the spending related to National Games and Grand Prix were included in OpEx—operating expense—above EBITDA line and not in the corporate expense?

Geoffrey Stuart Davis: Those expenses are in our property margins. The additional bad debt was approximately $5 million for the quarter, and we expect that to come back down to more normal levels going forward. And then we had about $6 million for the anniversary.

D.S. Kim: Thank you.

Operator: Our next question today comes from John G. DeCree at CBRE. Please go ahead.

John G. DeCree: Maybe just one on CapEx. Geoff, I apologize if I missed it. Could you give us the CapEx number for the year? And could you break it out for major projects—maybe by COD or Studio City—at the property level, what we should expect?

Geoffrey Stuart Davis: Sure. Our total CapEx for this year, which reflects a little bit of carry forward from money we anticipated spending in 2025 that has pushed into 2026, is $450 million. The only material one that I would call out would be the Countdown Hotel, which is approximately $100 million for 2026. Broken out by jurisdiction, the total CapEx in Macau is roughly $375 million, $35 million to $40 million in Manila, and $35 million to $40 million in Cyprus.

John G. DeCree: Perfect.

Geoffrey Stuart Davis: You are welcome.

Operator: Thank you. That concludes the question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Jeanny Kim for any closing remarks.

Jeanny Kim: Thank you, Operator, and thank you all for joining. We will see you next quarter.

Operator: Thank you. That does conclude our conference for today. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (MLCO)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Melco Resorts & Entertainment Limited (MLCO) Financial Profile