Owens & Minor, Inc.

Owens & Minor, Inc. (OMI) Market Cap

Owens & Minor, Inc. has a market capitalization of $207.1M.

Financials based on reported quarter end 2025-12-31

Price: $2.68

0.22 (8.94%)

Market Cap: 207.07M

NYSE · time unavailable

CEO: Edward A. Pesicka

Sector: Healthcare

Industry: Medical - Distribution

IPO Date: 1980-03-17

Website: https://www.owens-minor.com

Owens & Minor, Inc. (OMI) - Company Information

Market Cap: 207.07M · Sector: Healthcare

Owens & Minor, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates as a healthcare solutions company in the United States and internationally. It operates through two segments, Global Solutions and Global Products. The Global Solutions segment offers a portfolio of products and services to healthcare providers and manufacturers. Its portfolio of medical and surgical supplies includes branded products and its proprietary products. This segment also offers services to healthcare providers, which include supplier management, analytics, inventory management, and clinical supply management; and various programs to provide logistics and marketing solutions to its suppliers. The Global Products segment manufactures and sources medical surgical products for the prevention of healthcare-associated infections across the acute and alternate site channels. This segments products portfolio includes sterilization wraps, surgical drapes and gowns, facial protection products, protective apparel, medical exam gloves, custom and minor procedure kits, and other medical products. It provides its products and services to multi-facility networks of healthcare providers, independent hospitals, surgery centers, physicians' practices, and networks of hospitals directly, as well as indirectly through third-party distributors. The company was founded in 1882 and is headquartered in Richmond, Virginia.

Analyst Sentiment

37%
Sell

Based on 5 ratings

Analyst 1Y Forecast: $7.75

Average target (based on 4 sources)

Consensus Price Target

Low

$4

Median

$4

High

$4

Average

$4

Potential Upside: 49.3%

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

📘 OWENS & MINOR INC (OMI) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Owens & Minor (OMI) operates in healthcare supply chain services, connecting manufacturers of medical products with hospitals, care sites, and other healthcare providers. The operating model typically combines (1) distribution—sourcing, warehousing, and fulfillment of medical-surgical products—and (2) outsourced logistics and supply management services, where OMI manages inventory and replenishment using provider-specific workflows and ordering processes.

The value chain is supported by a service-led approach: OMI’s ability to integrate with customer purchasing systems, forecast demand at the item and location level, and deliver consistent replenishment drives measurable operational outcomes for customers (reduced stockouts, lower manual procurement effort, and more controlled inventory). Customer stickiness increases as the service becomes embedded in daily clinical and operational processes.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is generally a mix of (a) transactional distribution tied to product movement and (b) contract-based supply chain services tied to service performance and inventory programs. Service contracts often convert a portion of demand volatility into more predictable recurring-like economics, while distribution maintains linkage to procedure volumes and consumption rates.

Margin drivers tend to include: (1) service mix (higher value-added logistics and inventory management can support better gross margins than commodity-like movement), (2) warehouse and delivery productivity (labor efficiency, pick/pack optimization, and delivery density), (3) contract economics (pricing structures, service-level terms, and retention clauses), and (4) working-capital discipline (inventory turns and the ability to manage order timing).

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

OMI’s most durable moat is switching costs paired with operational scale and process integration.

  • Switching costs: Hospitals and health systems commonly standardize on established ordering workflows, item catalogs, and inventory programs. Changing a distributor/provider of supply management requires re-integration work, protocol adjustments, and benefits validation—creating inertia even when competitors offer headline pricing.
  • Cost advantages from scale: Broad distribution footprints and procurement volume can improve unit economics through better utilization of transportation routes and warehouse systems, supporting competitive fulfillment costs.
  • Operational integration (intangible asset): Competence in demand forecasting, catalog management, and EDI/system connectivity operates like an intangible capability. Over time, performance data and operational playbooks improve execution, raising the bar for new entrants.

While healthcare logistics is competitive, it is typically hard for a challenger to displace embedded programs quickly across multi-site providers without demonstrating sustained service reliability and total cost improvements. That dynamic supports share retention and provides room to win incremental mandates.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Long-term growth prospects are primarily tied to structural trends in healthcare operations rather than reliance on cyclical end-markets.

  • Continued outsourcing of supply chain functions: Providers face persistent cost pressure and labor constraints, increasing incentives to externalize logistics, inventory control, and replenishment execution to specialized partners.
  • Complexity and SKU proliferation: Medical product variety, changing clinical protocols, and site-level differences elevate the value of sophisticated catalog, forecasting, and replenishment systems.
  • Aging demographics and procedure volumes: Higher utilization of healthcare services increases baseline demand for medical-surgical supply fulfillment and inventory management.
  • Health system consolidation and network optimization: Mergers and multi-site integration can create opportunities for distributors that standardize supply practices across the combined network.
  • Service expansion within existing customers: Once integrated, OMI can often broaden scope—from standard distribution into more comprehensive inventory programs and value-added logistics.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Customer consolidation and procurement renegotiations: Health system mergers can lead to re-tendering and pricing pressure, especially when contracts expire.
  • Service reliability and operational execution: Supply chain disruption, fulfillment errors, or delivery performance issues can lead to contract losses and margin volatility.
  • Cybersecurity and data integration risk: Heavy reliance on connectivity and customer systems increases exposure to cyber threats and operational downtime.
  • Working-capital and inventory risk: Forecasting errors, inventory obsolescence, or changes in demand patterns can affect cash conversion and profitability.
  • Competitive pricing and capacity dynamics: Logistics is prone to periods of pricing pressure, and excess capacity can compress margins.
  • Regulatory and compliance requirements: Healthcare supply activities require ongoing compliance; changes in standards and reporting can increase costs.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Equity valuation for healthcare distribution and logistics companies often places heavier emphasis on cash generation and operating margin durability than on top-line growth alone. The market frequently uses multiples such as EV/EBITDA and value-to-earnings frameworks, supported by attention to:

  • Normalized EBITDA margins driven by service mix and operational efficiency
  • Cash conversion reflecting working-capital performance
  • Evidence of retention and incremental program wins that support revenue stability
  • Risk-adjusted resilience tied to service-level performance and contract structure

Key value drivers typically include the ability to sustain service differentiation, protect margins through cost discipline, and convert operational execution into consistent free cash flow.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

OMI’s long-term investment case rests on a structural advantage in healthcare supply chain services: embedded customer integration that creates switching costs, supported by scale-driven cost efficiency and operational capabilities that are difficult to replicate quickly. Growth potential follows from healthcare providers’ ongoing shift toward outsourced, inventory-managed logistics and from increased supply chain complexity—provided execution remains strong and margin discipline is maintained.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

📊 AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2025-12-31

"OMI reported a negative revenue of $1.25B, indicating significant operational challenges. The company also recorded a net income loss of $56.33M, reflecting a concerning trend in profitability. The balance sheet shows total assets of $2.45B, against total liabilities of $2.91B, leading to negative equity of $460.98M, which raises red flags on financial health. The operating cash flow is negative at $66.59M, suggesting difficulties in sustaining operations without additional financing. Capital expenditures of $74.12M further indicate an aggressive investment strategy despite current losses. Given that dividends have not been paid since 2021 and the current share price is at $0, shareholder returns are virtually non-existent. Overall, OMI shows troubling signs of debt burden and lack of profitability, which require careful monitoring going forward."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

Negative revenue growth indicates serious operational issues.

Profitability

Neutral

Consistent net losses underscore a lack of profitability.

Cash Flow Quality

Neutral

Negative operating cash flow raises concerns about sustainability.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Neutral

Negative equity signifies high financial risk.

Shareholder Returns

Neutral

No dividends paid and shareholder value is declining.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Neutral

Price target remains low and market confidence appears weak.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Management is clearly upbeat about the strategic transformation into a pure-play home-based care company (automation, Sleep Journey, and Optum partnership momentum). However, the Q&A pressure is around tangible margin/cash swing risks rather than the narrative. The large commercial payer loss is the central overhang: management quantifies ~$300M revenue impact in 2026 versus 2025 (plus ~$40M in 2027) with full lapping by end of Q1 2027. On the profit side, Q4 adjusted EBITDA fell to $90M from $102.5M YoY, citing lower payment prices, inflationary product costs, higher health benefit costs, and stranded costs. Collection-rate weakness in 2025 is attributed to technology onboarding learning curves; management is confident in a rebound in 2026. The biggest cash swing factor highlighted is transaction break/financing fees of $98M. Overall, tone is optimistic on execution, but the analyst-relevant reality is near-term revenue replacement difficulty and cost/price imbalance.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Sleep supplies sales grew 8%–9% for both the quarter and full year (Sleep Journey initiative supporting reorders/revenue cycle)
  • Ostomy and urology categories grew year-over-year in Q4
  • Diabetes grew by almost 2% YoY in Q4; insulin pumps were cited as a driver for diabetes growth
  • Ongoing volume growth and improved collection rates expected to partially offset commercial payer revenue loss

Business Development

  • Preferred agreement signed with Optum (initial traction; not yet expected to fully backfill the lost customer revenue)
  • Core go-to-market brands / payer-dependent recognition: Byram and Apria
  • MyByram app strength; new MyApria app expected launch in Q2 2026

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Q4 2025 adjusted EBITDA: $90.0M vs $102.5M prior-year Q4 (drivers: lower payment prices, inflationary product cost increases, higher health benefit costs, and stranded costs partially offset by lower teammate benefit costs)
  • Full-year 2025 adjusted EBITDA: $375.0M (slightly up vs 2024)
  • Q4 2025 operating cash flow: $68M total; includes $67M cash used by the former discontinued Products & Healthcare services business; continuing ops generated $135M of cash from operating activities
  • Full-year 2025 free cash flow (continuing ops definition): $98M; Q4 free cash flow (continuing ops): $18M
  • Net debt at 12/31/2025: $1.8B (down $315M from 9/30; down $46M since 12/31/2024)
  • Revenue: full-year 2025 revenue nearly $2.8B (up a little more than 3%)
  • Large commercial payer impact: quarterly revenue impact ~1% of what would have been over 3% growth; absolute revenue impact expected to be ~+$300M reduction vs 2025 in 2026 and +~$40M in 2027; fully lapped by end of Q1 2027
  • 2026 guidance: revenue $2.55B–$2.65B; adjusted EBITDA $335M–$355M; levered free cash flow midpoint at least $100M

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Divestiture sale proceeds received: $342M proceeds; additional $12M–$15M expected in spring from purchase price working capital true-up/adjustments
  • Use of proceeds at close: $66M used to settle PNHS-related AR securitization bank debt obligations
  • Divestiture proceeds used for debt reduction (explicitly reaffirmed as intended use for all proceeds)
  • Liquidity: $282M cash on hand at 12/31; nearly $220M available under committed revolving credit facility; $16M available under newly amended accounts receivable securitization program
  • Debt paydown mentioned: $65M reduced from 9/30 prior to divestiture closing; paid down debt by $65M from ordinary free cash flow in Q4 commentary

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Post-divestiture cost actions: management expects continued cost takeout to address loss of a large commercial payer and stranded costs
  • Automation/technology to lower cost to serve: automated payer qualifications and faster/more accurate order validation to improve revenue capture
  • Sleep Journey initiative continues to drive sleep supply reorders and recurring revenue mechanics
  • Stranded costs treatment: Beginning with Q1 2026, company will no longer specifically break out stranded costs in reporting (these will be included in operating expenses)
  • Patient CapEx: $45M in Q4; ~$189M for full year 2025; for 2026, patient CapEx expected to be ~30% of total CapEx and to run ~95% of total going forward (per CFO question/answer framing that patient CapEx is the dominant component post mix change)

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • 2026 quarterly cadence expectation: ~60% of adjusted EBITDA realized in 2H 2026; Q1 weakest; Q4 strongest
  • Large payer revenue reduction timing: of ~$300M-plus 2026 impact vs 2025, ~15% occurs in Q1 and ~25%–30% in each of Q2–Q4 (partially offset by volume growth and improved collection rates)
  • Adjusted EBITDA and revenue guidance ranges: revenue $2.55B–$2.65B; adjusted EBITDA $335M–$355M; levered free cash flow at least $100M at midpoint

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Commercial payer loss/price impact: revenue headwind already partially reflected in Q4 (impact ~1% of what would have been over 3% growth) but expected to significantly increase across 2026 aggregate to ~ $300M vs 2025 and ~ $40M more in 2027; management expects complete lapping by end of Q1 2027
  • Manufacturer cost inflation outpacing pricing growth: described as a ‘focal point’ and ‘opportunity’ to improve EBITDA, not a single concentrated tariff-related issue; not broad-based across every category, but more prominent in major categories
  • Collection rate headwind in 2025: framed as minor pullback driven by technology investment learning curve and onboarding/implementation; management expects rebound in 2026
  • Stranded costs and inflationary product cost increases pressured Q4 adjusted EBITDA (stranded costs only partially offset by lower teammate benefit costs)
  • Balance sheet optimization and 2027 debt maturities: CFO noted debt coming current later this quarter / ‘maturities that are in ’27’ as a near-term constraint; other balance sheet actions ‘opportunistic’ after reassessment

Sentiment: CAUTIOUS

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the OMI Q4 2025 (reported for Accendra Health; divestiture closed 12/31/2025) earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (OMI)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Owens & Minor, Inc. (OMI) Financial Profile