Qfin Holdings, Inc.

Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) Market Cap

Qfin Holdings, Inc. has a market capitalization of $1.69B, based on the latest available market data.

Financials updated on 2025-09-30

SectorFinancial Services
IndustryFinancial - Credit Services
Employees3527
ExchangeNASDAQ Global Select

Price: $12.99

0.01 (0.08%)

Market Cap: 1.69B

NASDAQ · time unavailable

CEO: Haisheng Wu

Sector: Financial Services

Industry: Financial - Credit Services

IPO Date: 2018-12-14

Website: https://www.360shuke.com

Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) - Company Information

Market Cap: 1.69B · Sector: Financial Services

Qifu Technology, Inc., together with its subsidiaries, operates credit-tech platform under the 360 Jietiao brand in the People's Republic of China. The company provides credit-driven services that matches borrowers with financial institutions to conduct customer acquisition, initial and credit screening, advanced risk assessment, credit assessment, fund matching, and other post-facilitation services; and platform services, including loan facilitation and post-facilitation services to financial institution partners under intelligence credit engine, referral services, and risk management software-as-a-service. It offers e-commerce loans, enterprise loans, and invoice loans to SME owners. It serves financial institutions, consumers, and small- and micro-enterprises. The company was formerly known as 360 DigiTech, Inc. and changed its name to Qifu Technology, Inc. in March 2023. Qifu Technology, Inc. was founded in 2016 and is headquartered in Shanghai, the People's Republic of China.

Analyst ratings pending...

Consensus Price Target

No data available

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only. Please validate all data using official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📘 Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Qfin Holdings, Inc. is a financial technology company that supports consumer and investor access to financial products by combining product distribution with data-driven decisioning. Rather than operating as a traditional asset manager with only balance-sheet-driven returns, QFIN’s model emphasizes enabling origination and placement of third-party financial products—supported by technology, analytics, and operational workflows designed to improve matching efficiency and reduce friction in the customer journey.

At the core, QFIN participates in the expanding “digital financial services” ecosystem in which established financial institutions and product providers seek better customer acquisition, improved underwriting and risk screening, and higher conversion rates through technology-enabled channels. QFIN’s platform approach is intended to aggregate demand, leverage customer and transaction data for risk and suitability-oriented processes, and create scalable distribution capabilities across product categories.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

QFIN’s monetisation framework is commonly characterized by revenue linked to product distribution and platform-enabled services. While the exact mix can vary with market conditions and regulatory frameworks, the economics typically flow through:

  • Commission and placement-related income associated with distributing or facilitating transactions in wealth management and related financial products.
  • Service fees generated from technology and operational support provided to financial institutions and partners, where QFIN helps them acquire customers and improve funnel conversion.
  • Transaction- or performance-linked economics tied to customer onboarding outcomes, product holding periods, or other partner-defined metrics.
  • Ancillary income from platform components such as analytics, risk screening workflows, and customer engagement tooling.

From a business-model durability perspective, the key analytic question is whether QFIN’s revenues scale with partner demand and customer acquisition without proportionate increases in customer acquisition costs and compliance overhead. The best-case scenario for long-term value creation is sustained margin expansion through automation, improved targeting, higher-quality underwriting/suitability processes, and deeper partner integrations.

Investors should also monitor the degree of revenue dependency on any one partner type or product category, since fintech distribution economics can shift when product supply changes or when regulation tightens around distribution practices, disclosures, and suitability standards.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

QFIN’s competitive positioning is best understood through the lens of “data + distribution + risk workflows.” Fintech distribution businesses tend to compete on the ability to:

  • Identify and reach suitable customers efficiently while maintaining strong compliance and suitability standards.
  • Improve underwriting and decisioning using data-driven methods that reduce bad outcomes and partner costs.
  • Integrate smoothly with partner financial institutions so that partners prefer QFIN’s channel for scale and reliability.
  • Operate with cost discipline through technology-enabled automation and repeatable onboarding processes.

If QFIN can consistently translate data and customer insights into improved conversion and risk outcomes, it can maintain pricing power (or at least improved unit economics) relative to less integrated competitors. Over time, the company can compound advantages through larger datasets, better propensity modeling, more effective lifecycle engagement, and more refined partner workflows.

However, competitive advantage in fintech distribution is rarely static. Larger platforms, banks’ in-house digital initiatives, and other fintech aggregators can compress economics. Sustainable differentiation typically depends on (i) proprietary or hard-to-replicate data assets, (ii) operational integration depth, (iii) track record in underwriting/suitability performance, and (iv) brand trust with both customers and partners.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

QFIN’s multi-year growth thesis generally rests on structural trends in digitalization and consumer finance infrastructure. Key drivers include:

  • Digital shift in wealth and consumer financial product distribution as customers and institutions increasingly prefer online channels that reduce time-to-decision and simplify onboarding.
  • Partner demand for improved customer acquisition efficiency, where fintech channels that deliver measurable conversions gain share over time.
  • Greater emphasis on risk screening and suitability, which can favor platforms with stronger data/analytics capabilities and disciplined compliance processes.
  • Operational scalability via technology-enabled workflows that can lower per-customer servicing and compliance costs as volumes rise.
  • Cross-sell and expansion across product categories, where improved customer profiles can support broader monetisation opportunities.
  • Partner ecosystem integration, where deeper connectivity (systems, workflows, data exchange) can strengthen switching costs and improve resilience.

In a value-creation framework, the most important question is not only growth in topline activity, but whether growth converts into durable profitability. Investors should look for evidence of operating leverage, improving unit economics, and stable partner terms—particularly during periods when market supply or product incentives change.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

QFIN’s investment profile is shaped by several categories of risks that are common to fintech distribution and technology-enabled financial services. Key areas include:

  • Regulatory and compliance risk: financial product distribution is highly regulated, including licensing requirements, customer suitability rules, disclosures, and marketing practices. Changes in regulation can alter partner economics and restrict channel activities.
  • Credit and performance risk (if exposure exists): if QFIN’s model includes credit-linked components (directly or indirectly), adverse credit events can increase losses or trigger partner renegotiations. Even when revenues are commission-based, partner performance issues can feed back into demand and pricing.
  • Partner concentration risk: reliance on a limited number of financial institutions or product providers can impact revenue stability. Partner decisions on channel allocation can change quickly.
  • Customer acquisition cost pressure: digital channels can become more competitive, raising marketing spend and reducing incremental margins. Unit economics discipline is essential.
  • Technology, data, and security risk: data integrity, model risk, privacy requirements, cybersecurity threats, and system downtime can harm customer trust and regulatory standing.
  • Reputation and consumer protection risk: fintech platforms can face reputational damage if customer outcomes under partner products are poor or if suitability practices are questioned.
  • Macroeconomic and asset-market sensitivity: wealth and investment product demand often correlates with market liquidity and consumer confidence.
  • Competitive intensity: larger platforms and banks’ proprietary channels can reduce QFIN’s ability to capture incremental economics.
  • Liquidity and funding structure (if applicable to business activities): while commission-based models may be less capital intensive than balance-sheet lending, funding needs can arise through operational initiatives, product-linked risks, or strategic investments.

A disciplined risk review should include ongoing monitoring of (i) regulatory developments affecting distribution, (ii) trends in revenue mix and partner composition, (iii) cost-to-serve and marketing efficiency, and (iv) any signals that underwriting/suitability outcomes are deteriorating.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Valuation for fintech distribution platforms like QFIN is typically framed around expected long-term monetisation capacity, scalability of the cost base, and the sustainability of partner economics. Because near-term earnings can be influenced by revenue mix and market cycle effects, investors often place greater weight on:

  • Revenue quality and durability: proportion of income tied to recurring partner relationships and scalable platform activity versus more volatile, incentive-driven flows.
  • Operating leverage: whether incremental revenue produces improving contribution margins and lower operating expense intensity.
  • Unit economics: customer acquisition efficiency, conversion rates, and cost-to-serve trends across product lines.
  • Balance of growth vs. compliance cost: whether regulatory burdens are rising faster than revenue generation.
  • Discount rate and risk premium: fintech earnings power can be sensitive to regulation and competition, warranting careful scenario analysis.

From a market view standpoint, the underlying long-term narrative is constructive: digital distribution is likely to expand as customers and institutions continue adopting technology-enabled workflows. The investment debate centers on whether QFIN can maintain differentiated channel economics amid intensifying competition and regulatory evolution.

A reasonable approach for valuation involves scenario-based modeling that ties revenue growth to platform scalability and partner demand, while simultaneously modeling margin outcomes under conservative compliance and cost assumptions. Comparable valuation multiples can provide a reference point, but they can be less reliable when companies differ materially in partner mix, compliance posture, and revenue durability.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Qfin Holdings, Inc. represents an opportunity to invest in the digitization of financial product distribution—where technology-enabled customer matching, analytics-driven decisioning, and partner integrations can create scalable distribution economics. The investment case is strongest when the business demonstrates durable partner relationships, resilient unit economics, and improving operating leverage, supported by disciplined compliance execution.

Key diligence priorities should focus on revenue mix stability, partner concentration, cost-to-acquire efficiency, and evidence that risk and suitability workflows translate into better outcomes and partner confidence. The primary underwriting risks are regulatory changes that constrain distribution economics, competitive pressure that compresses margins, and any performance deterioration that could impair partner allocation and trust.

Overall, QFIN is best evaluated as a fintech platform with potential compounding benefits from data-driven execution and scalable distribution—while recognizing that long-term value creation depends on regulatory resilience, execution quality, and sustained profitability as volumes expand.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

Management tone is confident on long-term sustainability but openly cautious for the next 1–2 quarters due to regulatory-driven model/risk resets. In Q&A, the analyst pressure centered on (1) what the new loan facilitation rules do to take rate and loan economics and (2) whether shareholder returns are at risk. Management’s hard answer: Q4 take rate is guided around ~3%–4% (from pricing + risk impact) and liquidity/risk pressure is expected to continue, supported by observed deterioration in risk metrics (e.g., 90-day delinquency 2.09% vs 1.97% in Q2; C-M2 0.79% vs 0.64%) and historically high provisions (coverage 613%). They also disclosed operational timing: risk tightening in Sep/Oct typically takes 2–3 quarters to show up in overall portfolio. Financially, non-GAAP net income fell to CNY 1.51B and Q4 EPS guidance was constrained (CNY 1.0B–1.2B), while buybacks were temporarily paused—then set to resume immediately after the window opens.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • AI-powered credit decision engine + asset distribution platform served 167 financial institutions and supported 62M credit-line users cumulatively
  • Loan volume from Technology Solutions (AI plus banking) up ~218% QoQ (facilitated ~RMB 5.4B in Q3; outstanding balance >RMB 10B)
  • Embedded finance network expansion: added 7 new strategic partners; embedded finance new credit-line users +13% sequentially; loan volume +11%

Business Development

  • AI + banking: FocusPRO credit tech platform adopted by several new banking partners (positive feedback)
  • AI Credit Officer and AI Loan Officer entered pilot testing with first bank client; engagement rate ~50% among activated user base
  • Technology Solutions partnered with >20 financial institutions (Q3 facilitated ~RMB 5.4B)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Revenue: total net revenue CNY 5.21B in Q3 vs CNY 5.22B in Q2 and CNY 4.37B YoY
  • Capital-heavy service revenue CNY 3.87B vs CNY 3.57B in Q2 (up sequentially; driven by higher capital-heavy loan balance)
  • Platform service revenue (capital-light) CNY 1.34B vs CNY 1.65B in Q2 (down sequentially; driven by lower capital-light facilitation and ICE volume)
  • Non-GAAP net income CNY 1.51B (down from CNY 1.85B in Q2); Non-GAAP EPS/ADS (fully diluted) RMB 11.36 vs RMB 13.63 in Q2
  • Funding/ABS: issued RMB 4.5B ABS in Q3 (+29% YoY); issuance costs down another 10 bps; guidance: funding costs to remain largely stable
  • IRR: average loan IRR 20.9% in Q3 vs 21.4% in Q2
  • Delinquency & collections: 90-day delinquency 2.09% (vs 1.97% in Q2); Day-1 delinquency 5.5% (vs 5.1%); 30-day collection rate 85.7% (vs 87.3%); C-M2 0.79% (vs 0.64%)
  • Risk indicators: FPD7 declined in September vs August; management expects volatility with risk indicators staying above historical averages; monthly stabilization signs in November
  • Provisions: new provisions for risk-bearing loans ~RMB 2.58B vs ~RMB 2.5B in Q2 (provision booking ratio hit another historical high); write-backs RMB 785M vs RMB 1.18B in Q2; provision coverage ratio 613% in Q3
  • Tax: effective tax rate 20.9% vs typical ~15%; higher ETR due to withholding tax provision for cash distribution from onshore to offshore

AI IconCapital Funding

  • ABS issuance: RMB 4.5B in Q3; RMB 18.9B YTD (+41% YoY)
  • Cash: operating cash flow CNY 2.5B in Q3 vs CNY 2.62B in Q2; cash + cash equivalents + short-term investments CNY 14.35B (vs CNY 13.34B in Q2)
  • Share repurchase: $450M program started January 1; as of Nov 18 purchased ~7.3M ADS for ~CNY 281M (avg USD 38.7/ADS, incl. commissions); ~$170M remaining (per Q&A)
  • Repurchase execution: temporary pause in Q3 due to incoming regulatory update; resume after the window opens post-earnings call

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Risk model iteration intensity: completed 611 iterations with differentiated risk management/distribution strategies
  • Collection/resource reallocation: allocated more resources to high-performing collection partners to ensure capacity/productivity
  • Real-time segmentation: used large language model algorithms to assess repayment intent/capacity in real time for more precise segmentation
  • Risk tightening timing: took additional measures to tighten credit standards in September and October
  • Collection execution changes (Q&A): adding in-house capacity; increasing support for partner agencies; improved user profiling/matching so each case goes to direct team
  • Technology productization: upgrading FocusPRO into a 'super credit AI agent' (AI Credit Officer/AI Loan Officer); claims approvals can be completed within the same day

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • Q4 2025 guidance: non-GAAP net income CNY 1.0B to CNY 1.2B (cautious planning for next couple of quarters)
  • Take-rate (Q&A): for Q4 baseline, management cited take rate ~3% to 4% due to pricing + risk impact
  • Industry risk trajectory (Q&A): management expects volatility to continue for next 1–2 quarters

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • Funding liquidity tightening in the high-price segment drove industry delinquency uptick (Q3); management states risk indicators expected to remain volatile near-term and above historical averages
  • Delinquency pressure: 90-day delinquency 2.09% (up from 1.97%); C-M2 increased to 0.79% from 0.64%
  • Regulatory risk: new loan facilitation rules effective Oct 1 (Q&A states business/profit model adjustment and take-rate pressure)
  • Macro: 'unexpected China events' and persistent consumer finance headwinds; outstanding short-term consumer loans declined 3 consecutive quarters
  • APR/price cap uncertainty (Q&A): regulators informally communicating consumer finance companies need average pricing below 20% (management expects market impact on size, risk, profitability even if direct exposure is limited)
  • Higher tax burden: ETR 20.9% due to withholding tax provision related to onshore-to-offshore cash distribution

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the QFIN Q3 2025 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

🧾 Full Earnings Call Transcript

Ticker: QFIN

Quarter: Q4 2025

Date: 2026-03-17 00:00:00

Operator: Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Qfin Holdings Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] Please also note that today's event is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Ms. Karen Ji, Senior Director of Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

Karen Ji: Thanks, Darcy. Good morning, and good evening, every one. Welcome to Qfin Holdings Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. Joining me today are Mr. Wu Haisheng, our CEO; Mr. Alex Xu, our CFO; and Mr. Zheng Yan, our CRO. Before we start, I will quickly cover the safe harbor statement. Today's discussions may contain forward-looking statements, particularly statements about our business and financial outlook that are subject to risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Please refer to the safe harbor statements in our earnings release. On this call, we will also discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to our earnings release which contains a reconciliation of the non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures. Now I will turn the call over to Mr. Wu Haisheng. Please go ahead.

Haisheng Wu: Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us today. In 2025, China's consumer finance industry underwent a systemic restructuring under regulatory guidance, the introduction of several key policies, including new loan facilitation rules, window guidance for consumer finance companies and guidelines on comprehensive financing cost management for micro lenders. In the near term, these measures tightened market liquidity, which in turn suppressed credit demand and put unprecedented pressure on both loan growth and risk management across the industry. Over the longer term, however, we expect the ongoing consolidation will facilitate a healthier and more efficient market environment, creating broader opportunities for leading credit tech platforms. We have proactively pivoted our strategy to embrace regulatory changes, by putting compliance and risk management at the core of our strategy. We concluded 2025 with resilient financial and operational results. As of the end of 2025, our AI-powered credit decision engine and asset distribution platform served 167 financial institutions, delivering intelligent digital credit services to over 63 million credit line users on a cumulative basis. The rollout of new loan facilitation rules in Q4 led to a further contraction in market liquidity. In response to the dynamic market conditions, we further tightened our risk standards while continuing to optimize our business structure. As a result, total loan facilitation and origination volume on our platform decreased by 21.8% year-over-year to RMB 70.3 billion in the quarter. Non-GAAP net income in Q4 decreased by 45.7% year-over-year to RMB 1.07 billion, and non-GAAP EPADS on a fully diluted basis decreased by 39.8% year-over-year to RMB 8.23%. We delivered on our previously issued Q4 guidance despite the challenging market environment. Turning to the full year. Our performance remains resilient and stable overall. Total loan facilitation and origination volume reached approximately RMB 327.1 billion, representing a year-over-year increase of 1.6%. Non-GAAP net income declined by 1% year-over-year to RMB 6.35 billion while non-GAAP EPADS on a fully diluted basis increased 10.4% year-over-year to RMB 46.8. In the second half of 2025, the consumer credit industry saw a sector-wide risk elevation amid significant business adjustments. Our risk metrics also experienced notable volatilities. Although leading risk indicators for new vintages improved meaningfully in Q4, legacy portfolios continued to face headwinds. Our C2M2 ratio, which measures the outstanding delinquency rate after 30 days of collection, increased to 0.97%, the highest recorded since COVID in 2020. Against this challenging backdrop, we prioritize risk management and promptly adjusted risk strategies across the entire credit life cycle to ensure sustainable, high-quality growth. First, we continued to strengthen the acquisition and the engagement of high-quality users by optimizing our credit approval framework and pricing strategies. We drove higher utilization and retention among high-quality borrowers. The proportion of loan volume from this group rose by 6 percentage points sequentially in Q4. At the same time, we enhanced our ability to detect and guard against the multi-borrowing risks. For example, when our models detect that a user is submitting loan applications across multiple platforms within a short period, the system interprets this as a sign of potential financial stress and automatically triggers an alert. We will take proactive measures such as lowering credit limit or restricting loan disbursements to mitigate potential risks before they materialize. These enhancements improved our area under curve or AUC by 10% to 15%, reflecting a stronger ability to differentiate risk tiers. With this due approach, we maintain stable originations to high-quality borrowers while strategically contracting higher-risk segments, resulting in a meaningfully improved asset mix. As a result, our FPD 30, a leading risk indicator for new loans declined by approximately 18% sequentially in Q4. Second, on the collection front, we optimize the resource allocation towards high-performing partners to boost productivity by refining borrower profiling analysis, we improved our ability to assess borrowers' willingness and capacity to repay, allowing for more tailored collection strategies. As a result, our 30-day collection rate improved marginally month-over-month in both November and December, indicating steady recovery in collection efficiency. In late December, the PBOC introduced a onetime credit remediation policy, which allows eligible individuals to fix damaged credit records by the 31st of March 2026. We have seamlessly incorporated this policy into our collection strategy metrics to further support asset recovery. This has partially incentivized repayment intent among borrowers, and we expect it to have some positive impact on our collection efforts in Q1. Despite a challenging industry environment, our risk strategies continue to deliver tangible results. FPD 30 for December vintages was close to our historical lows over the past 2 years as new loans constitute an increasing share of our portfolio, our C-M2 ratio remained broadly stable after peaking in October. As of January 2026 supported by continued asset mix optimization and the runoff of legacy assets, C2M2 ratio declined by 8.2% month over month from December. Based on our recent observation, we expect C2M2 ratio in February to broadly return to the levels seen in July and August 2025. Looking ahead, given the uncertainty around the regulatory environment and industry liquidity in the coming months, we will continue to dynamically adjust our risk strategies to bolster business resilience amid market volatility. On the funding front, underpinned by our diversified financial partnerships and strong market standing, we achieved a modest reduction in ABS issuance costs despite liquidity contraction in Q4. As ABS comprised a larger proportion of our risk-bearing funding mix, our overall funding cost fell by another 20 basis points from Q3 to a historical low. For full year 2025, total ABS issuance grew 40.8% year-over-year to RMB 21.4 billion, while the average issuance cost declined by 72 basis points from last year, supported by our robust asset quality and long-standing partnerships with financial institutions. Looking to 2026, the funding environment remains challenging, which may cause short term volatility in our funding costs. However, our track record of consistent asset performance has enabled us to build a strong, trusted partnerships with financial institutions, ensuring a well-positioned funding access relative to industry peers. Looking ahead, we will continue to diversify our funding channels, and optimize our funding structure to ensure stable liquidity and competitive funding costs amid market volatility. In user acquisition, we maintained a prudent approach with a continued focus on high-quality users. At the same time, we proactively expanded into lower pricing borrower segments to further optimize our customer mix. While these segments entail slightly higher up-front acquisition costs than those of our mainstream segments, their demand tends to be more stable over time, and their risk profiles are more predictable. We also optimized our embedded finance channel mix by phasing out underperforming channels and concentrating on high-value channel partners. As a result, FPD 30 for new loans from embedded finance channels improved sequentially in both November and December. In 2026, our priority remains increasing the proportion of high-quality users in our acquisition mix. At the same time, we will further refine underwriting and pricing strategies to improve acquisition efficiency and maintain a relatively stable customer acquisition cost. Our Technology Solutions business exhibited strong growth momentum in 2025 with total loan volume up by approximately 448% year-over-year. Our business scale has reached a new milestone with outstanding loan balance approaching RMB 11.7 billion by year-end, built on our deep technological capabilities and fintech expertise, Focus Pro, our proprietary lending solution tailored for financial institutions helps banks serve customer segments priced typically between 3% and 12% by applying digital and intelligent tools across the entire credit life cycle from customer acquisition and marketing to product design, risk identification and process optimization. Focus Pro enables banks to expand beyond traditional customer segments and efficiently serve the financing needs of underserved small businesses and individuals. This initiative not only broadens our business scope but also underscores our commitment to supporting the real economy and advancing financial inclusion. Under our AI+ credit strategy, our 2-core AI agents, the AI Loan Officer and AI Credit Officer, have delivered encouraging early results across multiple use cases. As these products continue to evolve, we plan to gradually extend them beyond retail credit into a broader set of business scenarios. Looking ahead to 2026, we will remain committed to our "One Core, Two Wings" Strategy, strengthening our operating capabilities and enhancing resilience on the evolving regulatory framework. For our credit business, serving high-quality users will remain a long-term strategic priority. By leveraging dynamic pricing and a superior user experience, we will continue to grow the proportion of high-quality users within our customer mix, maximizing customer lifetime value and ensuring stable asset quality. We are witnessing a regulatory-driven restructuring that will likely accelerate industry consolidation over the next 2 years. As a leading credit tech platform, we embrace this evolution as an opportunity to upgrade our core competencies and build the foundation for sustainable long-term growth. By navigating this cycle, we expect to emerge as a stronger and more resilient industry leader with deeper structural moats. Our technology solutions business is entering into a new phase of growth. After 2 years of refinement, its value proposition has been validated through extensive institutional partnerships. Leveraging our AI technologies and full life cycle credit expertise developed over the years, we are integrating these capabilities deeply into bank's inclusive lending value chain. Through flexible collaboration models across a diverse range of business scenarios, we help financial institutions strengthen their in-house risk management and operations capabilities while advancing our shared mission of financial inclusion. 2025 marked the successful launch of our international business. This year, we will actively pursue opportunities across several overseas markets to accelerate global expansion, including Europe, Latin America, Southeast Asia and so on. Our vision is to become a globally respected fintech company that leverages technology to promote financial inclusion and elevate the quality of financial services worldwide. We look forward to sharing more progress in the coming quarters. Finally, on capital allocation. In 2025, we returned approximately USD 200 million in dividends and USD 680 million via share repurchases, representing 98% of our 2024 GAAP net income. Since the start of 2024. we have cumulatively repurchased 40 million ADSs, equivalent to 25.4% of our outstanding shares at the start of 2024. Looking ahead to 2026, we will remain committed to delivering decent shareholder returns through a progressive dividend policy. Capital allocation efficiency is one of our top priorities. Going forward, we will continue to strike a balance between growth initiatives and shareholder returns to deliver sustainable long-term value for our shareholders. With that, I will now turn the call over to Alex.

Zuoli Xu: Thank you, Haisheng. Good morning, and good evening, everyone. Welcome to our fourth quarter earnings call. We closed the year in a drastically changing operating environment, challenging macro conditions combined with intense regulatory scrutiny, put significant pressure to the consumer finance industry, causing noticeable liquidity squeeze and rising risks in Q4. Our operational focus has shifted towards efficiency improvement and cost reduction as well as a continuous effort to manage risk exposure. Total net revenue for Q4 was CNY 4.09 billion versus CNY 5.21 billion in Q3 and CNY 4.48 billion a year ago. Revenue from credit driven service, capital heavy was CNY 3.43 billion in Q4 compared to CNY 3.87 billion in Q3 and CNY 2.89 billion a year ago. The year-on-year increase was mainly due to the increase in on-balance sheet loans more than offsetting the decline in off-balance sheet loans. The sequential decline was also due to significant lower off-balance sheet loans. Overall funding costs declined 20 bps Q-on-Q as we rely on less external fundings in Q4. Revenue from platform service capital light was CNY 660 million in Q4 compared to CNY 1.34 billion in Q3 and CNY 1.59 billion a year ago. The year-on-year and sequential decline was mainly due to significantly lower ICE contribution in response to the regulatory changes and lower ICE take rate due to the rising risks. During the quarter, average IRR of the loans we originated and/or facilitated declined about 150 bps versus prior quarter. Looking forward, we may continue to see gradual decline in average pricing as we focus more on high-quality and low-priced users in the coming quarters. Sales and marketing expenses declined 17% Q-on-Q. We took a more cautious view in customer acquisition given the higher overall risks. We added approximately 1.45 million new credit line users in Q4 versus 1.95 in Q3. We will likely maintain controlled pace to acquire new users in the near term in response to the changing regulatory directions and still uncertain macro condition. 90-day delinquency rate was 2.71% in Q4 compared to 2.09% in Q3. Day 1 delinquency rate was 6.1% in Q4 versus 5.5% in Q3. 30-day collection rate was 84.1% in Q4 versus 85.7% in Q3. Another key metric, C-M2, which represent the outstanding delinquency rate after 30-day collection was 0.97% in Q4 versus 0.79% in Q3. With our latest risk tightening measures in place, we started to see marginal improvement in overall risk performance in recent months. Given current macro conditions and the regulatory changes, we continue to take a prudent approach to book provisions against potential credit losses. Total new provisions for risk-bearing loans in Q4 were approximately CNY 1.92 billion versus CNY 2.58 billion in Q3. The decline in new provision was mainly due to lower risk bearing loan volume and improved new loan risks Q-on-Q. Write-backs of the previous provision were approximately CNY 274 million in Q4 versus CNY 785 million in Q3. Provision coverage ratio, which is defined as a total outstanding provision divided by total outstanding delinquent risk-bearing loan balance between 90 and 180 days were 481% in Q4, while declined sequentially and still well above historical average. Non-GAAP net profit was CNY 1.07 billion in Q4 compared to CNY 1.51 billion in Q3 and CNY 1.97 billion a year ago. The significant year-on-year and sequential decline in profitability was mainly due to lower loan volume, higher quite cost and deleveraging in operations. Non-GAAP net income per fully diluted ADS was RMB 8.2 in Q4, which brought non-GAAP EPADS for the full year of 2025 to RMB 46.8, a year-on-year increase of 10.4% as substantial share count reduction continued to create EPADS accretion. Efficient tax rate for Q4 -- effective tax rate for Q4 was 11.3% compared to our typical ETR of approximately 15%. The lower than normal ETR in Q4 was mainly due to the typical year-end adjustments. Leverage ratio, which is defined as a risk-bearing loan balance divided by shareholders' equity was 2.7x in Q4 versus 3x in Q3 due to lower risk-bearing loan balance. We expect to see the leverage ratio fluctuated around this level in the near future. We generated approximately CNY 3.15 billion cash from operations in Q4 compared to CNY 2.5 billion in Q3. Total cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment was CNY 10.72 billion in Q4 compared to CNY 14.35 billion in Q3. During the Q4, we, in aggregate, repurchased approximately 8.7 million ADSs in open market for a total amount of approximately 168.8 million, inclusive of commissions at the average price of $19.4 per ADS. As such, we had completed substantially all of the $450 million 2025 share repurchase plan, combined with the $227 million share repurchase we completed in connection with our CB issuance in March 2025. For full year 2025, we have in aggregate repurchased approximately 21.1 million ADSs for a total amount of approximately USD 677 million, inclusive of the commission at the average price of USD 32.1 per ADS, representing a 14.8% of our total share outstanding at the beginning of '25. In Q4, we took market opportunities to start to buy back our outstanding CBs as of March 17, 2026, we had repurchased approximately USD 460 million in aggregate principal amount of the CB for USD 399 million in cash. On open market and in off-market product negotiated transactions, approximately USD 230 million in aggregate principal amount of the CB remains outstanding. The repurchase of the CB allowed us to reduce our long-term debt obligation and associated interest payments at favorable terms, potentially strengthening our financial position and the flexibility and meanwhile, realizing cash gains. In accordance with our current dividend policy, our Board has approved a dividend of USD 0.39 per Class A ordinary share or USD 0.78 per ADS for the second half of the 2025 to holders of record of Class A ordinary share and ADSs as of close of business on April 22, 2026, Hong Kong Time and New York Time, respectively. We will continue to optimize our capital allocation strategy to reflect the changing macro dynamic to support business initiative and to return to the shareholders. As we maintain a progressive DPS dividend policy, we will also opportunistically look into an entry point to resume share repurchase when macro and regulatory environment become more stable and settled. Finally, regarding our business outlook, where we start to see some tentative signs of improvement in some operating metrics, macro uncertainty and regulatory pressure persist in the foreseeable future. We will continue to take a cautious approach in business planning for 2026 and focus on efficiency and cost cutting. For the first quarter of 2026, the company expects to generate non-GAAP net income between RMB 900 million and RMB 950 million, representing a year-on-year decline between 51% and 53%. This outlook reflects the company's current and preliminary view, which is subject to material changes. With that, I would like to conclude our prepared remarks. Operator, we can now take some questions.

Operator: [Operator Instructions] Your first question today comes from Richard Xu from Morgan Stanley.

Richard Xu: [Foreign Language] Basically, two questions for me. One is considering the regulatory efforts to reduce the funding loan yield? What are the some of these medium-term long-term outlook for the pricing of loans? And also, what are the average or sustainable net take rate levels going forward? Second question is on the shareholder return, whether -- how do you balance dividend and a buyback and particularly whether the dividend is [indiscernible]. Thank you.

Haisheng Wu: Okay. Richard, let me take your first one and Alex can take the second one. And for the first one, over the past year, a series of new regulations and window guidance were rolled out to driven down overall borrowing costs. As the industry evolves, small platforms with high pricing are quickly exiting the market. In the long run, these policies will reduce the burden of borrowers and create a healthier market. This will lead to industry consolidation and support the growth of the consumption sector. Following the regulatory guidance, we are proactively focusing on high-quality users. In the fourth quarter, our average pricing dropped by 140 basis points. In 2026, we will continue to build our strength in serving these high-quality users. By using flexible pricing and a better user experience, we can gradually increase the portion of high-quality users and customer mix, thus ensuring stable asset quality and better LTV. As we improve our asset structure, we expect some room for further downward adjustment in our average pricing for 2026. In the medium to long term, our pricing will depend on changes in the market and the regulatory environment. In terms of the take rate, our Q4 take rates were 3.5%. Excluding onetime items, the operational take rate was slightly below 3%. We believe there is still substantial room to optimize this through better risk management and the efficiency improvement. Since Q4, our proactive measures have already shown clear results. Looking ahead, if the regulatory environment stays stable, we aim to maintain a take rate of about 3%.

Zuoli Xu: Okay. Richard, I will take the shareholder return part. As you know, we have always been putting the shareholder return as one of the top items when we're making the critical decision-making in the company. In 2025, the cumulative dividend payout and the share buyback were close to $200 million and $680 million, respectively. That basically gives us a total payout ratio about 98% as a percentage of our 2024 GAAP net income. And since the beginning of 2024, we have brought back approximately 40 million ADSs in total, accounting for about 25% -- 25.4% of the total share count at the beginning of 2024. This payout ratio as well as the combined yield is probably still the highest among the Chinese ADRs. In the future, as I mentioned in the prepared remarks, we intend to maintain the progressive DPS policy in the foreseeable future. So that can give the shareholders an expectable kind of dividend yield with that policy support. Regarding the buyback, I think at this point, I would say we take a little bit more cautious view approach for this, just given what's happening in the macro environment and also as well as the regulatory dynamic there, but we are open-minded. And as you know, we still have an outstanding buyback program not being fully utilized yet. And if the opportunity arised, meaning when the macro conditions become more stable and the regulatory environment becomes more settled, we will restart the buyback program. Some people are concerned that with the buyback of the CDs, we sort of used up all the CD kind of proceeds at this point. But in reality, if you look at our balance sheet, we still have plenty of cash on the balance sheet to support any of the potential shareholder return programs there. So for the longer term view, I think we will continue to balance between investing in the long-term business growth and shareholder returns and to maintain a decent ROE and create long-term value to the shareholders. Thank you.

Operator: Your next question comes from Emma Xu from Bank of America Securities.

Emma Xu: [Foreign Language] So the first question is about the risk. What has been the trend of risk indicators so far this year? And how do you foresee the future trend of risk changes? The second question is about business structure. Given the latest market environment, how should we waive the choice between asset-heavy and asset-light business models? What is your outlook on the proportion of the heavy versus asset-light structure for this year?

Zuoli Xu: I will probably refer to the first risk question to our CRO, Mr. Zheng.

Yan Zheng: [Foreign Language]

Unknown Executive: [Interpreted] Okay. I will do the brief translation. So in the fourth quarter, the industry faced huge pressure due to tightened liquidity. We took proactive steps in both underwriting and collections. And by far, we have seen clear results. For underwriting, we quickly tightened our pricing and credit limit standards. We also improved our ability to identify multi-platform borrowing risks. This has helped us exclude high-risk groups early and focus more on high-quality customers, which has largely improved our customer structure. For collection, we adjusted our strategy on a timely basis. First, we started manpower intervention in collection earlier for high-risk users. Second, we offered fee discounts or waivers for customers with temporary financial difficulties. Third, we increased incentives to boost the performance of our teams.

Yan Zheng: [Foreign Language]

Unknown Executive: [Interpreted] Thanks for these efforts. Our FPD 30 for new loans in Q4 dropped by 18% Q-on-Q. The FPD 30 for December cohort was close to its best level in the past 2 years. This positive trend continues in 2026. Our January data shows that the FPD 7 improved by another 10% from December, also reaching a 2-year best. As new loans make up a larger share of our portfolio, our overall risk is improving, and we also see our C-M2 ratio peaked in October and stayed stable in November and December. In January, the C-M2 ratio dropped by 8.2% month-on-month. Based on current change, we will expect February C-M2 ratio to return to the levels of July and August '25.

Yan Zheng: [Foreign Language]

Unknown Executive: [Interpreted] Of course, the macro environment is still undergoing changes with ongoing industry adjustments. We will closely monitor early risk signals and remain flexible to adjust our strategies as the environment changes. Thank you.

Zuoli Xu: And Emma, I will take the second part regarding the business mix. As you know, the capital-light and capital-heavy have their own sort of pros and cons. We normally will adjust the mix between the two, depending on the macro condition and outside environment. Normally, in the upcycle, we intend to do more capital-heavy because it's generally speaking, generating higher return and higher take rate, where in the down cycle, we prefer offloading more risks. So we prefer the capital-light side of the model. Consider that given the current regulatory and the macro environment, we probably want to have more flexibility and more diverse risk. And so this year, meaning 2026, we probably will directionally moving towards capital-light a little bit. In '25, for example, the -- on the loan volume side, total capital-light was about 44% as a total volume in '25. This year, most likely, we will see this number moving up. But that said, we're not going to set a fix target in terms of mix between the light and heavy. It's more like a dynamically changing target from time to time given the end market condition there. Thank you.

Operator: Your next question comes from Alex Ye from UBS.

Xiaoxiong Ye: [Foreign Language] I have two questions here. First one is about the ICE business. So we have seen the Q4 referral service fee. Obviously, it was down by 85% Q-on-Q. So could you help us understand the reason behind? And with the new loan facilitation regulation, so how should we expect this ICE business, the take rate to evolve going forward and the business outlook? Second question is about the funding cost. So with the new micro loan regulation, setting the 4x LPR cap on loan pricing. So how does that impact our ABS issuance plan for this year and the implication for our overall blended funding cost for the year?

Zuoli Xu: Okay. Alex, I will take the first part, and then Haisheng will take over the funding cost side of things. So yes, the first quarter, our revenue contribution from ICE declined pretty meaningfully. Basically, there are 2 factors to drive that. First of all, the volume. Because the -- under the new regulatory setting the funding partners in the ICE segment become much more cautious in terms of providing funding. And also this the ICE targeted segment overall as in the industry declined significantly. And this caused our ICE volume declined by 41% Q-on-Q and ICE only account for roughly 20% of our total loan volume in Q4. Secondly, the second driver is actually the take rate decline. As you know, most of the ICE users are what we consider the marginal customers in terms of the risk level tend to be higher than other users. We -- to maintain a sustainable business relationship with those ICE partners, we basically proactively lowered our take rate a little bit to ensure the reasonable conversion rate and also to ensure the partner still can run a sustainable business. So although a short term look at it, we sacrificed some of the take rate there. But longer term, I think it's a good way to maintain a sustainable relationship and sustainable business in terms of ICE in the challenging period. Looking forward, we still believe ICE is a very important part of our platform strategy. We want to serve a broader user base as possible by different -- using different models, we match -- we can match assets with the right funding in the most efficient way. Even though the pricing dynamics changed quite significantly, still, the ICE segment can still serve some of the users that in compliance with the current pricing environment. So our future focus is to explore the diversity in need of the long-tail customers will stay in compliance. And by offering more valuable value-added services, we will improve their stickiness to the platform and long-term value. This will ensure the long-term profitability of our ICE businesses. Haisheng?

Haisheng Wu: Okay. Let me take your second question about the funding cost. Given the macro and regulatory environment uncertainty this year, the marketing liquidity remains tight. This is putting pressure on our funding costs. First, regarding ABS funding costs, the implementation of 4x LPR are making investors more cautious. They may ask for higher returns on micro loan assets. As a result, both our issuance amount and the funding costs will face some uncertainty this year. Second, regarding funding of loan facilitation business, many financial institutions have received regulatory guidance to be more careful about deploying capital into this segment. This will also lead to a tighter funding supply to some extent. In terms of funding structure, if our ABS issuance goes smoothly, the proportion of our on-balance sheet loan will remain at a steady level, and we expect the overall funding structure to stay stable as well. Our strategy is to continue expanding our financing channels and optimizing our structure. We aim to keep our funding supply stable and our cost competitive throughout the whole year. Thank you.

Operator: Your next question comes from Cindy Wang from China Renaissance.

Yun-Yin Wang: [Foreign Language] And I have two questions here. First, management mentioned that the C-M2 level improved significantly in January and February. So can we conclude that the credit risk has stabilized? And what is management's outlook for new loan volume growth in Q2 this year and beyond? Second is -- the question is related to the overseas market expansion strategies. Please give us an update on the latest development in overseas markets, especially in the U.K. Are there any plans to enter new markets this year?

Haisheng Wu: Okay, Cindy. Yes. Indeed, the risk control measures we took in Q4 have shown clear results recently. Especially in February, the C2M2 ratio returned to the level of last July and August. However, we need some more time to see if this improvement is sustainable. In addition, as the industry-wide adjustments continue and the regulatory uncertainty remains, we will keep a prudent risk strategy and focus on quality of loans. At the same time, we are working to attract higher-quality users and improve our operational capabilities to serve them better. To us, health needs and the sustainability of our business is more important than just volume growth. We have seen positive signals from the recent 2 sessions regarding consumption and credit support. In our view, the underlying logic of consumer credit-driven consumption remain unchanged. After the industry consolidation, we will become stronger and better positioned to capture long-term growth opportunities in the market. And in terms of the overseas business, yes, overseas business will be a better part of our company's strategy to drive long-term growth and a diversified business structure. By reshaping our business mix, we will become more robust and defensive. Given today's market environment, this strategy is especially meaningful. Therefore, we will firmly invest more resources and speed up our pace of overseas expansion. In 2025, we took the lead and entered the mature market. We used small-scale volume to train our risk model and build our market know-how. This has already achieved early results. At the same time, we conducted extensive and deep research on multiple global markets. We have selected several markets for preparation and one of them has started operations in 2026. In 2026, we will actively explore multiple markets, including both mature and the developing regions, such as Europe, Latin America and Southeast Asia. These 2 types of markets have different pros and cons. Mature markets have higher entry barriers, but we have established credit system and higher regulatory uncertainty. Developing markets may not have perfect credit data yet, but they have a huge market scale and the lower barrier to enter. In this market, there is also a clear path to profit. Therefore, we rebalanced our resources between both types of markets. We expect our overseas teams to grow to about 200 people by the end of the year. Over the past 2 years, based on our extensive research and studies in different overseas markets, we are extremely confident that our technology and risk model are best in class. With our deep credit know-how, AI and big data-driven technology and a strong balance sheet, we are fully committed to our overseas strategy and aim to take a frog leap to become a leading global credit tech company in the foreseeable future. Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I'll now hand back over for any closing remarks.

Zuoli Xu: Sure. Thank you again for everyone to join the conference. If you have any additional questions, please feel free to contact us off-line. Thank you. Have a good day.

Operator: That does conclude our conference for today. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect. [Portions of this transcript that are marked [Interpreted] were spoken by an interpreter present on the live call.]

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (QFIN)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Qfin Holdings, Inc. (QFIN) Financial Profile