SandRidge Energy, Inc.

SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) Market Cap

SandRidge Energy, Inc. has a market capitalization of $541.7M.

Financials based on reported quarter end 2025-12-31

Price: $14.71

β–² 0.25 (1.73%)

Market Cap: 541.70M

NYSE Β· time unavailable

CEO: Grayson R. Pranin Jr.

Sector: Energy

Industry: Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

IPO Date: 2016-10-04

Website: https://sandridgeenergy.com

SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) - Company Information

Market Cap: 541.70M Β· Sector: Energy

SandRidge Energy, Inc. engages in the acquisition, development, and production of oil and natural gas primarily in the United States Mid-Continent. As of December 31, 2021, it had an interest in 817.0 net producing wells; and operated approximately 368,000 net leasehold acres in Oklahoma and Kansas, as well as total estimated proved reserves of 71.3 million barrels of oil equivalent. The company was incorporated in 2006 and is headquartered in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Analyst Sentiment

42%
Sell

Based on 24 ratings

Consensus Price Target

No data available

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

πŸ“˜ Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only.

πŸ“˜ SANDRIDGE ENERGY INC (SD) β€” Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

SandRidge Energy Inc. is an upstream oil and natural gas producer. The value chain is straightforward: the company evaluates subsurface prospects, secures and develops oil and gas acreage, drills and completes wells, then produces hydrocarbons into regional gathering and transportation networks. Cash generation depends on (1) the quality of reservoir assets, (2) development execution (drilling and completion effectiveness), and (3) the ability to move production to market through contracted or available transportation and sales channels.

Customer β€œstickiness” is not the typical consumer-switching framework; instead, operational and asset-level stickiness matters. Once capital is sunk into field infrastructure, well inventory, and location-specific operating know-how, future development plans can leverage existing pads, gathering connectivity, and experienced teamsβ€”supporting repeatable execution within the same producing basins.

πŸ’° Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

Revenue is primarily derived from commodity sales of crude oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids (NGLs). Monetisation is driven by physical production volumes, the realized pricing environment (often influenced by regional basis differentials and quality spreads), and the mix of oil versus gas and the proportion of NGL yield. For upstream E&Ps, β€œrecurring” cash flows are not contractual; they are recurring only to the extent that the company maintains production through continued drilling and effective well performance over time.

Margin drivers typically include: (1) net realized price after transportation, gathering, and hedging (if used), (2) lease operating expense efficiency per produced volume, (3) depletion and capital intensity needed to sustain production, and (4) the proportion of high-value liquids within the production stream. Sustained cost discipline and good finding/development economics are the primary structural levers behind margins.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

Moat: Location-based resource quality and execution scale in specific basins (asset-level advantage).

In upstream, competitors can copy drilling techniques, but they cannot easily replicate the underlying economic geology, existing infrastructure, and accumulated execution learning tied to a defined acreage footprint. Competitive advantage is commonly rooted in:

  • Cost advantages from repeatable operations: Familiarity with local geology and proven completion designs can reduce dry-hole risk and improve well productivity and drilling efficiency.
  • Acreage and development optionality: Holding and developing a portfolio of drilling locations allows the company to pace capital, prioritize the highest-return inventory, and respond to commodity price cycles.
  • Infrastructure and connectivity: Existing gathering, facilities, and transportation access can lower per-unit costs and reduce time-to-market for new wells.
  • Relationship and contracting leverage: Longstanding relationships with service providers and regional midstream counterparties can improve terms and execution reliability, particularly when industry capacity tightens.

This is less of a β€œnetwork effects” business and more of a basin-focused, execution-and-asset-quality moat. Competitors can enter similar basins, but they often face higher effective costs when they lack equivalent acreage quality, operating experience, and infrastructure depth.

πŸš€ Multi-Year Growth Drivers

Over a 5–10 year horizon, growth is typically a function of maintaining and expanding reserves through disciplined capital allocation rather than top-down demand growth alone. Key multi-year drivers include:

  • Development of existing inventory: Upstream companies with a credible inventory of drill-ready locations can grow production when economics support investment.
  • Technological improvement and continuous optimization: Enhanced drilling practices, completion designs, and operational processes can improve ultimate recovery and lower unit costs.
  • Capital discipline and portfolio management: With commodity price cycles, the ability to preserve balance sheet flexibility and target high-return projects tends to determine long-run compounding potential.
  • Regional market infrastructure: Availability and expansion of gathering and takeaway capacity can support better realized prices and reduce operational bottlenecks.
  • Secular energy demand with shifting supply mix: Global demand for hydrocarbons persists, while supply is increasingly shaped by capital and efficiency constraints. Firms with assets that remain economic through a range of commodity scenarios can sustain production and market presence.

The long-term outcome depends on maintaining attractive finding and development economics while managing the inherent cyclicality of oil and gas pricing.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

  • Commodity price volatility: Oil and gas prices drive cash flow directly and can compress returns across the portfolio.
  • Capital intensity and depletion: Production typically requires ongoing investment to replace declines; misallocated capital can impair per-unit economics.
  • Operational execution risk: Variability in drilling results, completion effectiveness, downtime, and well performance can alter reserve and cash flow trajectories.
  • Regulatory and environmental constraints: Permitting, flaring/venting rules, produced water management, and emissions requirements can increase costs and slow development.
  • Midstream and basis risk: Transportation and gathering constraints can lead to narrower differentials and lower realized prices in certain regions.
  • Liquidity and balance sheet risk: In downturns, access to capital and debt covenants can constrain development and inventory pacing.

πŸ“Š Valuation & Market View

The market commonly values upstream E&Ps using enterprise value relative to cash flow (e.g., EV/EBITDA) and discounted cash flow frameworks tied to reserve quality and development economics. Asset base composition matters: higher-quality liquids-rich production often commands a valuation premium versus gas-heavy, higher-decline profiles.

Key valuation β€œmove-the-needle” drivers include:

  • Net realized price assumptions (including basis and NGL yield).
  • Unit costs (lease operating expense, transportation, and sustaining capital).
  • Reserve/replacement economics (finding and development costs and decline rates).
  • Capital efficiency and discipline (ability to sustain production with conservative, high-return drilling).
  • Balance sheet flexibility (deleveraging capacity and resilience through commodity downturns).

Because upstream cash flows are cyclical, valuation can diverge meaningfully from long-run fundamentals when sentiment shifts across the commodity complex. A robust investment view typically relies on demonstrated cost structure, credible inventory quality, and durable development economics across commodity scenarios.

πŸ” Investment Takeaway

SandRidge Energy’s long-term investment case rests on the ability to convert basin-specific asset quality and operational know-how into consistent development economics. The primary β€œmoat” is not contractual customer retention but asset-level advantageβ€”acreage quality, infrastructure connectivity, and repeatable execution that can lower unit costs and support resilient cash generation through cycles. The key underwriting variables are realized pricing versus cost structure, sustainable capital discipline, and ongoing drilling effectiveness that preserves reserves and production over time.


⚠ AI-generated β€” informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...

πŸ“Š AI Financial Analysis

Powered by StockMarketInfo
Earnings Data: Q Ending 2025-12-31

"SD reported a revenue of $39.4M and a net income of $21.6M for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025, translating to an EPS of $0.59. The company has total assets of $644.0M and a solid equity position with total liabilities at $133.15M, resulting in total equity of $510.87M. Importantly, net debt stands at -$110.998M, indicating a strong cash position. SD generated $31.69M in operating cash flow and reported a free cash flow of $13.72M after capital expenditures. The company has an attractive dividend payment history, distributing $0.12 per share quarterly, contributing to a yearly return for shareholders. SD has seen a substantial 47.28% price appreciation over the past year, which significantly enhances total shareholder return metrics despite modest dividend yields. Overall, the company appears financially sound, with solid profitability and growth indicators, making it a potentially attractive option for investors."

Revenue Growth

Neutral

Moderate revenue growth reflecting increasing sales.

Profitability

Good

Strong net income relative to revenue, indicating solid profitability.

Cash Flow Quality

Positive

Positive operating and free cash flow showcasing healthy cash management.

Leverage & Balance Sheet

Strong

Strong balance sheet with negative net debt indicating liquidity.

Shareholder Returns

Strong

High price appreciation and regular dividends enhance total returns.

Analyst Sentiment & Valuation

Positive

Positive sentiment with ongoing solid valuation fundamentals.

Disclaimer:This analysis is AI-generated for informational purposes only. Accuracy is not guaranteed and this does not constitute financial advice.

Management sounded upbeat about execution (Cherokee Play ramp, safety record, and cost discipline) and emphasized balance-sheet strength (no debt, ~$112m cash, ~$1.6b NOLs). However, the Q&A revealed that the wide 2026 guidance range is primarily driven by β€œtiming” and asset-level mechanics rather than demand uncertainty: crew/weather could push wells into later 2026 or 2027, and Oklahoma pooling not yet finalized can change working interest (and therefore capital/production) beyond or below what is budgeted. On hedging, investors challenged how to think about upside vs locked-in cash flows; management acknowledged opportunistic layeringβ€”oil hedges were put on recently, so near-term hedged % may look lower than the full-year run-rate. For gas/NGL, the market implied structurally worsening differentials; management attributed Q4’s widened basis to local/temporal factors and tied realization to fixed deducts vs Henry Hub (moving results toward upper guidance when gas is ~higher priced). Overall: confident tone on fundamentals, but guidance uncertainty tied to execution/timing and differential variability.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Cherokee Play operated development program: 6 wells brought online in 2025; 19.5 MBoe/d Q4 2025 production
  • 2026 operated drilling/completions plan: drill 10 Cherokee wells, complete 8 (2 completions carry into 2027)
  • Oil growth target: management expects to grow oil production volumes ~20% in 2026
  • Cost discipline initiatives supporting per-well peak performance (first 6 operated wells ~2,000 Boe/d 30-day peak, ~44% oil)

Business Development

    AI IconFinancial Highlights

    • Full-year revenues ~ $156m (+25% vs 2024)
    • Adjusted EBITDA: ~$25m in Q4 2025; ~$101.1m for full year (vs ~$69m prior year period)
    • Net income: $21.6m in Q4 ($0.59 diluted EPS); adjusted net income $12.5m ($0.34 diluted EPS)
    • Full-year net income: $70.2m ($1.90 diluted EPS); full-year adjusted net income: $54.7m ($1.48 EPS)
    • Cash balance at quarter-end: ~$112.3m (incl. restricted cash), >$3/share
    • No debt outstanding (balance-sheet support; also no bank-mandated hedging requirements cited in Q&A)
    • Repurchases: ~600,000 shares for ~$6.4m at VWAP $10.72; $68.3m remaining authorized
    • Dividend: $0.12/share declared March 3, 2026 payable March 31 (record March 20); $4.4m dividends paid in Q4 2025
    • Commodity realization (Q4 2025 before hedges): oil $57.56/bbl (vs $65.23 in Q3), gas $2.20/Mcf (vs $1.71), NGL $14.92/bbl (vs $15.61)
    • Adjusted G&A: Q4 $2.7m ($1.53/Boe) vs prior year $2.4m ($1.39/Boe); full-year $10.2m ($1.50/Boe) vs prior year $9.3m ($1.54/Boe)

    AI IconCapital Funding

    • Capital expenditures (Q4): ~$18m including drilling/completions and new leasehold acquisitions
    • Full-year capital: $76.2m (in line with 2025 guidance midpoint)
    • No debt outstanding; capital expenditures and capital returns funded with operating cash flow
    • Share repurchase authorization remaining: $68.3m

    AI IconStrategy & Ops

    • Cherokee operational execution: 6 operated wells completed/online from one-rig program; wells 7 & 8 brought online; drilling well 9
    • LOE (2025): $36.2m, 14% below low point of guidance; includes $4.3m nonrecurring, noncash operating accrual adjustments that benefited LOE
    • LOE excluding nonrecurring: still below low point driven by reduced expense mark overs, LOE efficiencies from recent acquisitions, and utility cost reductions
    • 2026 drilling plan with timing sensitivity: shift driven by crew/weather could move wells later in 2026 or into 2027

    AI IconMarket Outlook

    • 2026 guidance: production 6.4m to 7.7m Boe; CapEx $76m to $97m
    • Hedging: Q&A referenced ~23% of 2026 guidance midpoint hedged at the time of call (collars/swaps); includes ~37% gas and ~27% oil hedged; CFO also noted oil hedges were layered recently, implying oil hedge % later in year may be higher than the ~27% mentioned earlier

    AI IconRisks & Headwinds

    • Operational/timing risk to guidance range: drilling/completions timing impacted by availability of crews, weather, and pooling delays can shift wells into later periods, affecting production range
    • Working interest uncertainty: some wells' pooling not finalized in Oklahoma; pooling could increase working interest and therefore capital and production (company is not assuming full upside)
    • NGL/gas differential risk (and interpretation): gas realization depends on fixed deducts vs Henry Hub; management cited widening regional basis in Q4 as localized/temporal (Panhandle Eastern and NGL/PL markets)
    • Commodities sensitivity: oil relatively tight vs gas; management implies gas differential behavior could move outcomes toward upper vs lower guidance range depending on gas price environment
    • Mitigation cited for hedging/liquidity: no debt reduces requirement for bank-mandated hedging; company is opportunistic and monitors daily to layer contracts while preserving upside

    Sentiment: MIXED

    Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the SD Q4 2025 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

    Loading financial data and tables...
    πŸ“

    SEC Filings (SD)

    Β© 2026 Stock Market Info β€” SandRidge Energy, Inc. (SD) Financial Profile