Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd

Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd (ENLT) Market Cap

Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd has a market capitalization of $9.70B, based on the latest available market data.

Financials updated on 2025-12-31

SectorUtilities
IndustryRenewable Utilities
Employees360
ExchangeNASDAQ Global Select

Price: $69.87

-1.10 (-1.55%)

Market Cap: 9.70B

NASDAQ · time unavailable

CEO: Adi Leviatan

Sector: Utilities

Industry: Renewable Utilities

IPO Date: 2023-01-03

Website: https://www.enlightenergy.co.il

Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd (ENLT) - Company Information

Market Cap: 9.70B · Sector: Utilities

Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd operates as a renewable energy platform in Israel and internationally. The company initiates, plans, develops, constructs, and operates projects to produce electricity from renewable energy sources. It develops wind energy and solar energy projects, as well as energy storage projects. The company was incorporated in 1981 and is headquartered in Rosh HaAyin, Israel.

Analyst ratings pending...

Consensus Price Target

No data available

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only. Please validate all data using official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📘 Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd (ENLT) — Investment Overview

Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd (ENLT) is positioned as a specialist in clean electricity generation with an emphasis on project origination, development, and the long-term operation of renewable assets. The investment case centers on the durability of cash flows associated with renewable power generation (typically via contracted arrangements), the company’s ability to acquire and develop projects at attractive risk-adjusted returns, and the operational discipline required to sustain asset performance over multi-decade asset lives. In a sector where returns can be materially impacted by financing costs, grid connection progress, land and permitting, and technology execution, ENLT’s differentiation is best evaluated through the lens of pipeline quality, contracting strategy, execution capability, and balance-sheet resilience.

This summary provides an analyst-grade framework to understand ENLT’s business model, monetisation structure, competitive positioning, growth drivers, key risks, and how these components map into a valuation and investment stance.

🧩 Business Model Overview

ENLT’s business model is anchored in the renewable energy value chain, spanning the stages from identifying sites and developing projects to executing construction (directly and/or through contractors) and then operating producing assets for long duration. The economics of renewable power generally depend on three layers:

  • Resource and asset quality: Wind/solar resource adequacy, curtailment risk, grid accessibility, and component selection.
  • Contracting and offtake: The presence and terms of PPAs or other revenue arrangements, including pricing structure, tenor, and indexation mechanics.
  • Cost discipline and financing: CAPEX execution, O&M efficiency, and the cost/availability of project finance—critical determinants of project-level IRRs.

ENLT’s strategy typically involves building a portfolio approach—developing or acquiring projects, improving the probability of permit and interconnection readiness, and then monetising operational assets through long-term operating cash flows. A key analytical focus is the mix between development exposure (higher risk, higher potential upside) and operating exposure (lower risk, steadier cash flows). Investors often look for evidence that the company can transition projects from development to operations without large value leakage through cost overruns, commissioning delays, or adverse contract renegotiations.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

The monetisation model for renewable generators generally comprises contracted power sales and ancillary revenue components, with the share of each varying by technology and market structure. ENLT’s revenue profile is best understood by separating operating revenues from development and project-related income:

  • Operational electricity generation revenue: Primarily driven by energy production (subject to resource conditions and availability), contractual pricing (fixed, indexed, or market-linked), and the presence/terms of offtake arrangements.
  • Contracted cash flows versus merchant exposure: Projects with PPAs or fixed offtake terms typically provide greater visibility and reduce volatility, whereas merchant or partially merchant structures increase exposure to power price variability and dispatch constraints.
  • O&M and asset performance economics: Revenue quality depends on the ability to maintain availability, manage degradation/maintenance cycles (technology-specific), and limit downtime through preventive maintenance and effective asset management.

From a monetisation perspective, the durability of returns is shaped by the stability of payment mechanisms and counterparty quality. Investors should assess whether revenues are supported by long-term agreements with credible counterparties and whether any variable cost or pricing components create structural mismatches. Another important consideration is whether ENLT retains meaningful exposure to refinancing or restructuring events, which may occur as projects move from construction into operation and as interest-rate and credit conditions evolve.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

ENLT’s competitive position can be evaluated across origination, execution, and operational capability. While the renewable sector is increasingly competitive, there are still meaningful advantages available to disciplined developers and operators:

  • Development capability and pipeline quality: Competitive developers are able to identify sites with strong resource characteristics, manage permitting and land acquisition effectively, and secure interconnection pathways early enough to preserve project timelines.
  • Contracting discipline: The ability to structure or secure PPAs that appropriately distribute risk between developer, counterparty, and investor base is a durable advantage. Contract terms that balance price, tenor, curtailment handling, and escalation features can materially improve risk-adjusted outcomes.
  • Execution and project management: Renewable returns are sensitive to construction cost and commissioning timelines. A demonstrated track record of on-time/on-budget delivery reduces the probability of value erosion through claims, rework, and impaired debt service.
  • Operational know-how: Post-COD performance—availability, yield, and O&M cost control—is where many projects either confirm or fail to meet underwriting assumptions. Long-term operator competence can create compounding portfolio value.

In addition, portfolio construction itself can be a strategic edge. By diversifying across geographies, technologies (where applicable), and contracting structures, ENLT can potentially smooth cash flow volatility and improve resilience to technology-specific or counterparty-specific shocks. Investors should verify the extent of such diversification and how it influences correlations between project returns.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

ENLT’s multi-year growth potential typically depends on a combination of pipeline expansion, successful commissioning of developed projects, and the scaling of the operating portfolio. Growth drivers in renewable power are often “execution-led,” meaning value creation hinges less on marketing and more on converting opportunities into producing assets under acceptable economics.

  • Project pipeline conversion: The ability to move projects from concept and development stages into construction and then into commercial operation without major impairments is a primary determinant of growth.
  • Scaling contracted capacity: Expanding capacity under credible long-term offtake or contract structures improves visibility and supports financing.
  • Repowering and operational optimisation: Over time, portfolio optimisation through efficiency improvements, maintenance planning, and potential repowering opportunities can enhance long-run returns.
  • Financing and balance-sheet strategy: Access to project finance, refinancing pathways, and capital recycling mechanisms (where applicable) can fund continued development while limiting balance-sheet strain.
  • Policy and renewable demand tailwinds: Renewable energy mandates, grid modernisation, and corporate procurement policies can increase the availability and attractiveness of project opportunities—provided regulatory execution translates into bankable contracts.

For an investor, an important “quality of growth” lens is whether incremental capacity growth is accompanied by stable or improving project economics. Rapid capacity addition with weaker underwriting discipline can create latent balance-sheet risk through underperformance, renegotiations, or higher-than-expected cost to deliver.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

Renewable project businesses face a distinct set of risks. For ENLT, the most relevant risk categories include:

  • Construction, commissioning, and technology risk: Cost overruns, schedule slippage, equipment underperformance, and commissioning delays can impair returns and increase leverage at the project level.
  • Resource and yield uncertainty: Wind/solar generation can deviate from modelled assumptions due to measurement error, weather variability, curtailment, degradation, or operational issues.
  • Contract and counterparty risk: Offtake contract terms, counterparty creditworthiness, payment delays, termination clauses, and indexation mechanics can materially affect cash flows.
  • Power price and market risk (where applicable): Projects with partial merchant exposure may experience revenue volatility tied to market electricity prices and congestion.
  • Financing and interest rate risk: Project economics and capital structures depend on availability and cost of debt. Higher rates can reduce returns and complicate refinancing.
  • Regulatory and permitting risk: Changes in renewable incentives, grid access rules, land tenure requirements, environmental permitting, and local authority approvals can delay projects or change economics.
  • Grid and curtailment risk: Grid congestion, transmission constraints, and delayed grid upgrades can reduce effective output and undermine contractual revenue assumptions.
  • Execution and scale risk: Scaling development and construction activities can stress operational processes, procurement discipline, and contractor relationships.

An investment-grade approach involves monitoring not just the presence of these risks, but also how ENLT mitigates them—through contract design, engineering diligence, insurance coverage, robust procurement, and conservative underwriting. Investors should also look for indicators of whether project-level risks are concentrating in specific regions or counterparties.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Valuation for renewable energy developers and operators is typically framed around the quality and visibility of future cash flows, adjusted for development risk, the cost of capital, and the durability of contracted revenues. For ENLT, valuation assessment usually draws on a combination of:

  • Asset-based or sum-of-the-parts logic: Value of operating capacity based on expected cash flows and asset life; incremental value of development pipeline based on probability-weighted commissioning and achievable contract terms.
  • Cash flow yield and discount rate sensitivity: Renewable operating assets generally justify valuations under a discount rate reflecting long-term contracting stability and credit risk. Development exposure should be valued with a higher risk discount rate and probability adjustments.
  • Balance-sheet and capital structure considerations: Net debt, project-level leverage, and liquidity matter because renewable business models can be capital intensive during development and construction.
  • Market valuation versus implied expectations: Where the market price embeds optimistic pipeline conversion, stricter underwriting criteria or financing headwinds can compress valuation multiples.

A constructive market view often emerges when investors can underwrite that: (1) the pipeline is both bankable and converter-ready, (2) contracted economics remain resilient across potential interest rate and market conditions, and (3) ENLT’s cost discipline sustains returns through the construction-to-operation transition. Conversely, valuation risk increases when pipeline conversion probability weakens, when offtake contracts offer limited downside protection, or when cost of debt elevates project hurdle rates.

Given the sector’s volatility driven by financing and policy cycles, valuation should be treated as expectation-sensitive. A prudent stance is to evaluate a range of outcomes based on resource performance, curtailment rates, contracting terms, and debt service coverage—rather than relying on a single-point forecast.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd (ENLT) represents an investment opportunity in renewable power generation with an emphasis on converting development pipeline into operational assets that can produce longer-duration cash flows. The core investment thesis is most compelling when ENLT demonstrates three characteristics: disciplined project origination with strong asset fundamentals, contracting and risk allocation that supports predictable revenue generation, and execution capability that preserves underwriting economics through construction and commissioning.

The principal diligence focus should be on the probability-weighted quality of the pipeline, the stability and counterparty quality of offtake arrangements, the consistency of asset performance relative to model assumptions, and the robustness of financing and balance-sheet strategy. If these elements align, ENLT can offer a pathway to multi-year growth anchored in renewable capacity expansion and operational optimisation. If they diverge—through project delays, weaker contract economics, higher financing costs, or persistent yield underperformance—valuation outcomes may deteriorate quickly.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

So what: Management is using strong execution and policy/tax-engineering to justify higher 2028 run-rate expectations. They cite quantified contributors: the Project Jupiter Germany acquisition added $150M to 2028 run-rate, while CO Bar 4 & 5 shifting into preconstruction increases certainty (confidence/maturity level) behind the $2.1B-$2.3B target. Guidance for 2026 is also firm: revenues and income $755M-$785M and adjusted EBITDA $545M-$565M, with $160M-$180M of U.S. tax benefit embedded. However, the Q&A shows the real pressure points are regulatory eligibility (FEOC) and project schedule risk. When asked about FEOC’s impact, management said it reduces uncertainty and does not change current estimates for mature or already-safe-harbored projects, but they still expect more FEOC guidance—leaving residual uncertainty. On timing, analysts highlighted that 2026 growth is back-half loaded; management answered via first full-year revenues from Q4 2025 COD and additional region-specific connections, rather than changing underlying demand assumptions.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • Q4 US COD acceleration: Roadrunner (290MW PV / 940MWh) and Quail Ranch (128MW PV / 400MWh battery) commissioned ahead of schedule; delivered early revenues in Q4
  • CO Bar 1 & 2 construction mobilization after full 1GW interconnection approval; commercial ops: CO Bar 1 (2H 2027) and CO Bar 2 (1H 2028)
  • Snowflake A (595MW PV / 1,900MWh) construction progress (mass grading, ~1/2 PV installed; receiving battery shipments soon)
  • Israel distributed energy storage partnership with Mivne to supply ~US$500M over 15 years and develop storage at Mivne Properties

Business Development

  • Project Jupiter acquisition in Germany (2GWh storage + 150MW solar; expected ~15% unlevered return)
  • Signed agreement with Mivne (Israeli real estate firm with 550+ assets) for electricity supply (~US$500M/15 years) and partnership to develop energy storage at Mivne Properties
  • Salt River Project storage agreements for CO Bar phases 4 & 5 (enables full subscription of CO Bar complex)
  • S&P analysis placing Enlight in top 10 solar companies in the U.S. (not a contract but an external credential)

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Q4 2025 revenue and income: $152M vs $104M prior year (+46% YoY); 2025 full-year revenue and income: $582M
  • Adjusted EBITDA: Q4 $99M vs $65M prior year (+51%); full-year 2025 adjusted EBITDA: $438M (+51%)
  • Guidance outperformance: exceeded full-year revenue guidance by 4% and EBITDA guidance by 7%
  • Q4 revenue drivers: +$31M sale of electricity (to $124M) and +$28M income from tax benefit (to a level up $70M vs Q4 2024)
  • Q4 income-from-tax-benefit detail: Atrisco contributed $11M (including $3M domestic content eligibility); Roadrunner + Quail Ranch contributed $6M aggregate to tax benefit income
  • 2026 guidance: revenues and income $755M-$785M and adjusted EBITDA $545M-$565M (midpoint growth +32% rev/income, +27% EBITDA vs 2025)
  • 2026 guidance includes estimated $160M-$180M in income from U.S. tax benefit
  • 2028 annual run-rate update: increased to $2.1B-$2.3B from $1.9B-$2.2B (analyst question answered with quantified drivers)
  • Q&A quantified 2028 run-rate drivers: Jupiter contributed $150M of the increase; CO Bar 4 & 5 moved from advanced development into preconstruction (increased certainty level; moved within the 2028 run-rate framework)
  • Return/risk metrics (management): unlevered return on under-construction and preconstruction expected range increased to 12%-13% (from 11%-12% last quarter); return on equity expected >18%

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Project-level funding secured: $2.9B project finance; $470M tax equity; $350M mezzanine loans (in the '25 funding context discussed)
  • Corporate-level funding: raised $300M equity; $245M debenture; $50M asset sale; total raised since beginning of 2025: $4.3B
  • Liquidity/credit: $525M credit facility total with $360M available at balance sheet date
  • LC & surety bond facility: ~$1.5B total, $790M available at end of quarter
  • Capital-plan funding assurance (Q&A): management stated all sources are already available to fund the business plan through end of 2028 (corporate level “fully funded”); project-level financing still required as normal

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Pipeline derisking progress: 100% of preconstruction projects, 89% of advanced development, and 53% of development projects completed system impact study
  • Tax incentive execution: safe harbored >4 factored gigawatts in the past quarter; expects all advanced development and up to 40% of development portfolio safe harbored by June 2026
  • 2026 construction record: expected beginning of construction for 3-4 factored gigawatts, resulting in ~7 factored gigawatts under construction during 2026; near-all current mature portfolio generating or under construction in 2026
  • Operational US additions: U.S. operational portfolio doubled to 1.6 factored gigawatt (plus detailed generation/storage numbers from Q&A section)

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • 2026 guidance: revenues and income $755M-$785M; adjusted EBITDA $545M-$565M
  • 2026 operational guidance: add ~1.1 factored gigawatt to operational capacity (primarily 4Q 2026); contributes annual run-rate revenue and income $137M and adjusted EBITDA $109M
  • By year-end 2026: operational capacity increase target reiterated
  • By year-end 2028: achieve 12-13 factored gigawatts of operating capacity; annual run-rate revenue and income $2.1B-$2.3B; over 11GW from mature portfolio
  • Safe-harbor timing: plan to safe harbor 0.5 to 3.5 factored gigawatt in 1H 2026; beyond that PV safe harbor capped (storage remains available for ~3 more years)

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • FEOC uncertainty (Q&A): clarified that new FEOC publication provided clarifications on population methodology/equipment origin share; management stated estimates remain unchanged, no expected impact on mature portfolio or 2025 safe-harbored projects, and no significant impact on safe-harbor through mid-2026; additional FEOC guidance still expected
  • Interconnection execution hurdle (Q&A/ops): CO Bar interconnection risk addressed via executed LGIA; full approval for 1GW interconnection enabled full construction mobilization
  • Timing/weighting risk flagged by analyst: expansion in 2026 weighted to latter half; management attributed growth to first full-year revenues of Q4 2025 connected US projects (Quail Ranch, Roadrunner), plus full-year revenues in Israel (Bar-On floating PV + storage connected in 2025) and earlier Europe connections

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the ENLT Q4 2025 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

🧾 Full Earnings Call Transcript

Ticker: ENLT

Quarter: Q4 2025

Date: 2026-02-17 08:00:00

Operator: Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Enlight Renewable Energy's Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Earnings Call. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to Limor Zohar Megen, Director of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.

Limor Zohar Megen: Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining the Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Earnings Conference Call for Enlight Renewable Energy. Before beginning this call, I would like to draw participants' attention to the following. Certain statements made on the call today, including, but not limited to, statements regarding business strategy and plan, our project portfolio, market opportunity, utility demand and potential growth, discussions with commercial counterparties and financing resources, pricing trends for material, progress of company projects, including anticipated timing of related approvals and project completion and anticipated production delays, expected impact from various regulatory developments, completion of development, the potential impact of the current conflict in Israel in our operations and financial conditions and company action designed to mitigate such impact and the company's future financial and operational results and guidance, including revenue and adjusted EBITDA, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of U.S. Federal Securities laws, which reflect management's best judgment based on currently available information. We referenced certain project metrics in this earning call and additional information about such metrics can be found in our earnings release. These statements involve risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ from our expectations. Please refer to our 2024 annual report filed with the SEC on March 28, 2025, and other filings for more information on the specific factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements. Although we believe these expectations are reasonable, we undertake no obligation to revise any statements to reflect changes that occur after this call. Additionally, non-IFRS financial measures may be discussed on the call. These non-IFRS measures should be considered in addition to and not as a substitute for or in isolation from our results prepared in accordance with IFRS. Reconciliations to the most directly comparable IFRS financial measures are available in the earnings release and the earnings presentation for today's call, which are posted on our Investor Relations website. With me this morning are Gilad Yavetz, Executive Chairman and Co-Founder of Enlight; Adi Leviatan, CEO of Enlight; Nir Yehuda, CFO of Enlight; and Jared McKee, CEO of Clenera. Adi will provide a summary of the business results and turn the call over to Jared for a review of our U.S. activity. And then Nir will review the fourth quarter and year-end 2025 results. Our executive team will then be available to answer your questions. I will now turn the call over to Adi Leviatan, CEO of Enlight. Adi, please begin.

Adi Leviatan: Good morning and good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for joining us to review Enlight's fourth quarter and full year 2025 results and business performance. 2025 was another record year for Enlight. Across the U.S., Europe, and Israel, our teams delivered exceptional performance as developers, builders, owners and operators of large-scale renewable energy and storage projects. Our results reflect best-in-class execution, disciplined capital allocation, and the strength of our diversified multi-technology global platform. We are operating in a uniquely favorable environment for the energy sector, structural tailwinds, reindustrialization, electrification, and rapidly rising power demand from data centers are driving unprecedented long-term growth across global electricity markets. These trends continue to reinforce the competitive edge of our technologies. Enlight scale, portfolio depth, and proven execution position us to deliver fast, low-cost, clean energy where it is needed most. The fourth quarter capped an exceptional year. Revenue and income increased 46% year-over-year for both the quarter at $152 million and the full year at $582 million. Adjusted EBITDA in 2025 grew 51% to $438 million or 36% excluding the Sunlight sell-down. In Q4 alone, adjusted EBITDA accelerated to $99 million, up 51%. With this strong finish, we exceeded our full year revenue and EBITDA guidance by 4% and 7%, respectively. The fourth quarter also capped another record year of execution during which we significantly expanded every component of our portfolio and advanced projects across all stages of development. Our total portfolio expanded 26% during 2025, growing by 7.8 factored gigawatt to reach 38 factored gigawatts. The mature portfolio grew 33% to 11.4 factored gigawatts, and the operating portfolio increased 30% in the past 12 months. In Q4, two major U.S. projects, Quail Ranch and Roadrunner achieved COD ahead of schedule, delivering over 800 factored megawatts combined at approximately 13% unlevered returns. These additions doubled our U.S. operating portfolio to 1.6 factored gigawatt, underscoring our ability to deliver large solar-plus-storage projects on time and with attractive economics. Our under-construction portfolio, a significant contributor to our short- and medium-term growth has doubled over the past year. During the past 12 months, we started construction on the projects totaling 2.6 factored gigawatts. This reflects our capability to systematically mitigate development risks and push projects towards maturity. The most significant addition during the quarter was CO Bar 1 and 2, with a capacity of almost 1 factored gigawatt. CO Bar is a 2.4 factored gigawatt flagship project. Our largest to date. It comprises of five and a total investment of $3 billion. It is expected to generate an unlevered return of more than 13% as a result of a well-executed connect and expand strategy. Another notable project that started construction earlier in the year was Snowflake A, also in the U.S. with a capacity of 1.1 factored gigawatt. We also added more than 2.5 factored gigawatts to our pre-construction portfolio over the past 12 months. The most notable additions were Phase 4 and 5 in the CO Bar complex with a combined capacity of 0.9 factored gigawatt. Advancing CO Bar is a major achievement for Enlight and for our U.S. subsidiary, Clenera, and Jared will elaborate more on this shortly. Our U.S. platform continues to demonstrate best-in-class development expertise, providing strong visibility into our growth beyond 2028. 100% of preconstruction projects, 89% of advanced development and 53% of development projects have completed their system impact study, a critical step for interconnection certainty. We continued to proactively manage tax incentive eligibility in the U.S. by safe harboring more than 4 factored gigawatts over the past quarter leading to more than 13 factored gigawatt that were eligible for tax equity investments before 2026. We expect that all of our advanced development portfolio and up to 40% of our development portfolio will be safe harbored by June 2026. Energy storage remains a core pillar of our growth strategy. In Europe, the rapid growth in renewable energy generation capacity has not been matched by a corresponding build-out of storage capacity, creating a meaningful shortage of battery energy storage systems and a significant opportunity for fast growth supported by attractive returns. Our expansion momentum in Europe continued in the fourth quarter and into 2026 with the acquisition of Project Jupiter in Germany, a 2-gigawatt hour energy storage project paired with 150 megawatts of solar generation capacity expected to generate unlevered return of about 15%. This acquisition follows the acquisitions in Germany and Poland we disclosed in the previous quarter and further strengthens our position in the largest and one of the fastest-growing renewable markets in Europe. Overall, during the year, we expanded our mature storage portfolio in Europe by 3.5 gigawatt hour. We are highly committed to continuing our expansion in Europe. Leveraging our expertise and execution capabilities to capture the significant opportunities in the market. Our mature storage portfolio globally reached 17.5 gigawatt hour. An increase of over 50% from the previous quarter and over 6x its size, just 3 years ago. This expansion is yet another testament to Enlight's entrepreneurial DNA and our ability to recognize opportunities and act decisively. Our mature storage portfolio represents annual run rate revenues of approximately $1 billion. Nearly 50% of the revenue is currently reflected in our overall mature portfolio, positioning Enlight to benefit from power price fluctuations, optimization management, capacity services and ancillary grid services across markets. In Israel, we added meaningful storage capacity and continued to advance our solar-plus-storage build-out. Reinforcing local system flexibility and resilience. Over the past 12 months, high-voltage storage projects, totaling 1.35 gigawatt hour progressed from the advanced development portfolio to preconstruction. In addition, during the quarter, we signed an agreement with Mivne, a leading Israeli real estate firm with more than 550 assets nationwide to supply electricity for approximately $500 million over 15 years and to form a partnership, which will develop energy storage facilities at Mivne Properties across the country. The agreement follows dozens of similar distributed storage agreements signed over the past 12 months with leading real estate companies and other organizations. We are also expanding our agrivoltaic presence in Israel with 49 deals signed only in the past 12 months, reflecting a future solar generation capacity of approximately 2 factored gigawatt and growing synergies between solar and agriculture. As I mentioned earlier, we see a step change in power demand from AI and data centers. Industry outlooks indicate U.S. data center electricity consumption could roughly triple by the end of the decade. This demand must be met with scalable, cost-effective and clean energy, precisely where solar-plus-storage deliver superior levelized cost of electricity and time shifting capability. Our development capabilities position Enlight to be a partner of choice for large utilities and corporates as this build-out accelerates. We will share additional details on our strategy and plans to capture the data center opportunity at our upcoming virtual investor event on March 9. Looking forward, our strategy remains consistent and ambitious to triple the size of the business every 3 years by advancing high-quality projects through a derisked development funnel, while maintaining discipline on returns and capital structure. The continued growth of our operating portfolio and cash flow generation, combined with our differentiated global access to capital and execution capabilities enable us to further accelerate investment and Enlight's long-term growth. Commensurate to this, I'm excited to share that 2026 will be a record year of construction for Enlight with the expected beginning of construction of 3 to 4 factored gigawatts resulting in a record level of approximately 7 factored gigawatts that will be under construction during the year. In fact, almost all of our current mature portfolio will be either income-generating or under construction during 2026. By the end of 2026, we expect to add about 1.1 factored gigawatt to our operational capacity, primarily in the fourth quarter of the year. That will contribute annual run rate revenue and income of $137 million and adjusted EBITDA of $109 million. By year-end 2028, we expect to achieve 12 to 13 factored gigawatts of operating capacity, predicted to generate annual run rate revenue and income in the range of $2.1 billion to $2.3 billion. Over 11 factored gigawatts out of this capacity is in our mature portfolio. Underscoring the significant progress we made this year in increasing the visibility and certainty of our pipeline. Compared to our estimates in the previous quarter, 2028 revenue and income annual run rate increased by approximately $150 million and the planned capacity expanded by 1 factored gigawatt at the low end. The unlevered return on investment reflected in our under construction and preconstruction projects is expected to range from 12% to 13%, up from the 11% to 12% range we referenced last quarter, highlighting our continued focus on disciplined accretive growth. We now expect to deliver a return on equity of more than 18%. Before I hand over the floor to Jared, I would like to reiterate the key takeaways. We delivered a strong finish to 2025. Exceeding guidance by growing revenues and EBITDA meaningfully and continue to rapidly expand and derisk our pipeline. We are positioned for a record construction year in 2026 and remain on track to reach 12 to 13 factored gigawatt of operating capacity by 2028 at attractive returns, supported mainly by our current mature portfolio and underpinned by disciplined returns. With that, I will hand the call over to Jared.

Jared McKee: Thank you, Adi. In 2025, we continued to execute our growth strategy in the U.S. We doubled our operational capacity to 1.6 factored gigawatts and we have close to 5 factored gigawatts of additional projects under construction or in preconstruction expected to come online by the end of 2028. In fact, a recent analysis by S&P placed us in the top 10 solar companies in the United States. In the fourth quarter of 2025, we commissioned two new co-located PV and battery facilities and have fully mobilized construction on three more. The Roadrunner solar and storage facility in Southeast Arizona has been successfully commissioned. This facility has a generation capacity of 290 megawatts and energy storage of 940-megawatt hours. We achieved an early COD on the PV portion of the project, bringing an earlier-than-expected revenues for the quarter. We also achieved COD on our Quail Ranch solar and storage facility. This includes the 128-megawatt PV site and 400-megawatt hour battery storage. These projects bring our operational portfolio in the U.S. to 888 megawatts of generation and 2,540 megawatt hours of energy storage. Combined, these facilities are delivering enough energy to the grid to power over 220,000 American homes. We are in full construction on the first phases of two mega projects in the American Southwest, the Snowflake and CO Bar complexes. First, on the CO Bar complex, I am excited to announce that we have received full approval for the 1-gigawatt interconnection for the facility. The CO Bar project is a special project. and indicative of what the Clenera team can accomplish through their development expertise, tenacity and grit. The executed LGIA provides certainty on the interconnection and enabled a full construction mobilization. The construction team is mobilized in the first two phases of the project, CO Bar 1 and CO Bar 2. CO Bar 1 includes 254 megawatts of PV generation and 824-megawatt hours of battery storage with commercial operations scheduled for the second half of 2027. CO Bar 2, a 480-megawatt PV project anticipates commercial operations in the first half of 2028. We have also signed energy storage agreements with Salt River Project for the storage Phases, CO Bar 4 and 5. With these energy storage agreements in place, the entire 1,211 megawatts of solar and 4,000 megawatt hours of battery, the CO Bar complex is fully subscribed. Full mobilization of the CO Bar 3, 4 and 5 projects totaling 473 megawatts of PV and 3,176 megawatt hours of BESS is targeted over the next 6 to 12 months with commercial operation anticipated between the second half of 2027 to the first half of 2028. Moving on, Phase 1 of the Snowflake complex, Snowflake A includes 595 megawatts of PV and 1,900 megawatt hours of energy storage. The complex is located in Northeast Arizona, near the city of Holbrook. More than 300 skilled workers are mobilized on-site, advancing construction of the solar, battery, substation and transmission infrastructure. They have completed site mass grading installed about half of the PV and best piles and over 1/3 of the racking. The civil work for the substation energy storage facility is complete, and we will be receiving shipments of batteries soon. Once operational, the two complexes will generate enough clean energy to power over 325,000 Arizona homes. These mega projects exemplify our belief that utility-scale solar can deliver clean, reliable energy, while advancing responsible land stewardship. Early construction at CO Bar 1 and 2 removed hundreds of acres of invasive vegetation to be restored with native grasses, forms and flowers to enhance biodiversity. We are also funding a multiyear study to monitor large mammal migration around the complex, demonstrating the multidimensional opportunities our projects create in Arizona. We have also started construction at our Crimson Orchard project in Elmore County, Idaho. This project includes 120 megawatts of PV generation and 400-megawatt hours of energy storage. We expect it to be commissioned in the first half of next year. Once it is online, it will generate enough energy to power over 20,000 Idaho homes. The final project under construction is Country Acres, a 403-megawatt solar and 688-megawatt hour battery project near Sacramento. The mobilized construction crew is similar in size of Snowflake A with over 300 workers on site. They have completed site mass grading and installed nearly all PV and best piles along with half of the PV racking and 1/3 of the modules. The site substation is about 2/3 complete. The project remains scheduled for commercial operations by year-end, briefly reflecting on 2025. I want to thank everyone at Enlight and Clenera, as well as our customers, suppliers and contractors for their dedication and excellence throughout the year. We have once again demonstrated strong execution reinforcing the solid fundamentals of our energy market as utility and large load customers continue to seek new sources of generation. Global and U.S. power demand is expected to grow by more than 80% between 2025 and 2028, and Clenera and Enlight are well positioned with the financial strength, operational excellence, and mature projects to capitalize on this growth. In 2026, we will continue to build on this success and execute our U.S. growth strategy. I'll now turn the phone over to Nir.

Nir Yehuda: Thank you, Jared. The fourth quarter of '25 has been a strong quarter for Enlight, mainly resulting from the operation of new projects in the U.S. as we continue to materialize our growth plan. In the fourth quarter of '25, the company's total revenues and income increased to $152 million, up from $104 million last year, a growth rate of 46% year-over-year. This was compared of revenues from the sale of electricity, which amounted to $124 million, an increase of $31 million from the same period of '24, as well as recognition of $28 million in income from tax benefit, an increase of $70 million from Q4 '24. The growth in revenues from the sale of electricity is mainly attributed to newly operational projects, which contributed a total of $18 million to the growth in revenue. This project included Atrisco in New Mexico, which started commercial operation in December '24 and contributed about $11 million to sales of electricity, as well as Square Range in New Mexico and Roadrunner Arizona, which started commercial operations towards the end of '25 and contributed $2 million in the sale of electricity. Additionally, Project Pupin in Serbia started commercial operation towards the end of '24 and contributed $5 million to the increase in sale of electricity compared to Q4 '24. Additional notable items include an increase of $7 million in the sale of electricity in Israel attributed to electricity trade activity and contribution of $7 million from exchange rate fluctuation, mainly the depreciation of the U.S. dollar compared to the Israeli shekel and the euro. The increase in income from tax benefit is mostly attributed to Atrisco, which contributed $11 million, of which $3 million is attributed to the eligibility for domestic content. Roadrunner and Quail Ranch contributed an aggregate amount of $6 million to income from tax benefit. Revenue and income was distributed between MENA, Europe and the U.S. with 32% from Israel, 37% from Europe and 31% from the U.S. The company's adjusted EBITDA grew by 51% to $99 million compared to $65 million for the same period in '24. The increase in revenue was offset by an additional $12 million in cost of sales linked to new projects, while SG&A and project development expenses was by $3 million. Fourth quarter net income increased by $13 million compared to Q4 '24, amounted to $21 million. An increase of $34 million in EBITDA was partially offset by an increase of $12 million in depreciation and amortization attributed to the start of operation of new projects, as well as share-based compensation. Additionally, net financial expenses increased by $4 million and tax expenses increased by $7 million. Enlight secured a significant amount of new funding due in '25. At the project level, we secured $2.9 billion of project finance, as well as tax equity in the amount of $470 million, and the mezzanine loan amounted to $350 million. At the corporate level, we raised $300 million in equity, $245 million in debenture, and $50 million in an asset sale. Altogether, since the beginning of '25 Enlight raised $4.3 billion, providing the financial underpinning for our ambitious expansion plan with particular focus on the U.S. In addition to these funds, we have $525 million of credit facility at several banks, of which $360 million was available for use at the balance sheet date. In addition, we have approximately $1.5 billion in LC and surety bond facility, supporting our global expansion, of which $790 million were available for use at the end of the quarter. This further increases our financial flexibility as well continue to deliver on our growth strategy. Moving to 2016 guidance. We expect revenues and income between $755 million and $785 million, and adjusted EBITDA between $545 million and $565 million, reflecting annual growth of 32% and 27% at the midpoint, respectively, compared to '25 results. Our revenues and income guidance for '26 includes recognition of an estimated $160 million to $180 million in income from U.S. tax benefit. 90% of '26 generation output is expected to be sold at fixed prices, either through PPA or hedging of our total forecasted revenues and income, 39% are expected to be denominated in U.S. dollars, including tax incentives, 34% in Israeli shekel and 27% in euros. I will now turn the call over to the operator for questions.

Operator: [Operator Instructions] And your first question today comes from the line of Justin Clare from ROTH Capital Partners.

Justin Clare: So I first wanted to just start out, you had increased your expected annualized revenue and income run rate for 2028 to $2.1 billion to $2.3 billion, up from the $1.9 billion to $2.2 billion. So just wondering if you could walk through the drivers of the increase in that outlook? How much of that was attributable to the acquisition of the Jupiter project in Germany? And then just more broadly, how should we think about the potential role of acquisitions and the growth strategy here and whether there could be additional opportunities to accelerate the 2028 growth or beyond as a result of M&A?

Adi Leviatan: The acquisition of the Jupiter project contributed in and of itself. $150 million to the overall sum of the 2028 run rate revenues. In addition to that, CO Bar 4 and 5 were moved from the -- if you note that little dotted line on the 2028 annual revenue rate, it moved up from the advanced development into the preconstruction. So it moved into the 2.0 number, which did not extend the top range, but it does increase the level of certainty that it is now in the mature portfolio. And Justin just to also pick up on the second part of your question, we are always looking at opportunities also for acquisitions of projects and pipelines where it makes sense. Specifically, in the case of the storage markets in Europe, and specifically Project Jupiter in Germany, it is an opportunity to enter the market relatively quickly. That would be a reason why we would go for an acquisition of a project that is relatively mature. We are still a greenfield developer, but we do have the flexibility to acquire projects when we want to come into the market early, and you can see about the Jupiter project that they still -- it does not come at the expense of the project returns. As we mentioned in the presentation deck, it is a 15% unlevered project returns. So even when we acquire projects that are relatively mature, it does not come at the expense of the returns.

Justin Clare: Okay. Got it. Sounds good. And then just maybe shifting over to the safe harbor. You had indicated, I think, 13.2 factored gigawatts have currently been safe harbored. I think 4.3 over the last 3 months. So just at this point, can you talk about the potential to safe harbor additional capacity, is there a possibility to get beyond the 14 to 17 factored gigawatts targeted range. I'm just wondering if you could speak to any constraints. Are you limited more by just the pipeline of projects that you have? Or are there any limitations in equipment access or interconnection progress or other factors?

Adi Leviatan: I will answer the question, and then I will also refer it onwards to Jared. I will just answer that we do plan to still safe harbor, 0.5 to 3.5 factored gigawatt in this first half of 2026. And after that, of course, the safe harboring of PV solar projects will be capped. But safe harboring of energy storage projects is still available for 3 more years. So in that sense, we will be continuing to safe harbor specifically best so battery energy storage projects. But I will hand it over for Jared to complement my explanation.

Jared McKee: Yes. Thanks, Adi. We stand behind the 14 to 17 factored gigawatt range of safe harbor. As Adi mentioned, there are additional projects that we're looking at for 2026 that we'll be able to have full tax credits through 2030. The 14 to 17 factored gigawatt range is something that we're actually very proud of. It's been a significant undertaking from the team, as you all know, we include physical work of a significant nature, both off-site and offsite, offsite and on-site for our projects. And really, this gives us a very broad base to be able to pull from over the next 4 years as we're out there constructing and finishing our projects over the next 4 years.

Operator: And the next question comes from the line of Mark Strouse from JPMorgan.

Mark W. Strouse: Just a follow-up -- just a follow-up on Justin's question there. Just kind of given the outperformance in the stock that you've seen over the last several months, I understand that you're always looking at potential project acquisitions. But, just kind of curious how to think about the potential for kind of platform acquisitions. Are there other companies that you could potentially accretively acquire either to expand your capabilities, expand your geographic reach? Any comment there would be great.

Adi Leviatan: Thank you for the question. We are in a, I would say, potentially enviable position. We do have the flexibility and the ability to raise significant amounts of funds were liquid, we have various sources, including some that you've seen. I mean, that our projects are fully funded through 2028. So we're always looking at opportunities to acquire not only projects and platforms of projects, but also potentially if we need those missing capabilities also potentially more than that. And we will act accordingly in the various markets where we are operating, which is the U.S., Europe and Middle East, North Africa and approach these kinds of opportunities with great care for overall growth trajectory and for the shareholder value.

Operator: And your next question today comes from the line of Maheep Mandloi from Mizuho.

Maheep Mandloi: Congratulations on the quarter and the guidance here. And just going back to the question on safe harbor. With the new rules, the guidance, which came out last week, has that been more or less in line with expectations? Or does that change anything for you for safe harbor in the next few months here?

Adi Leviatan: Jared, do you want to take this one? I think it's regarding FEOC.

Jared McKee: Yes, I can take it, Adi. Just to confirm, this is the recent publication that was provided on FEOC did provide some clarifications regarding population methodology and the share of equipment originated from FEOC countries. They are in line with our previous guidelines and our estimates, and they help reduce uncertainty somewhat. The guidelines define the calculations, but they're still -- there's still more information that we expect to come. And so we do not expect any impact on our current estimations on our mature portfolio, as well as any projects, obviously, that we safe harbored already in 2025. As you know, those projects are not subject to FEOC. We don't expect a significant impact on any projects that we will safe harbor through the end of -- through the middle of this year, really, we do expect some additional guidance on FEOC.

Maheep Mandloi: Got it. Got it. And you guys kind of talked about almost $1 billion of cash, I think, between the HOLDCO and the subsidiaries and unrestricted restricted cash. So the question is more on the capital plan for equity needs. Does the cash on hand fund your projects through 2028? Or how should we think about equity needs for '28 and potentially even post '28 as well?

Adi Leviatan: I'm going to ask our Chief Corporate Development Officer, Itay Banayan to take the question.

Itay Banayan: o yes, the -- we have all of the available sources in our hands to fund the growth that we're presenting through the end of 2028. So if you'll see in the presentation, we're showing that we have a significant amount of projects already under construction as part of the mature portfolio, and these were already funded, obviously, and a significant portion that we're expecting to start construction this year. So basically, almost all of our mature portfolio will be either generating or under construction this year. And all of the sources needed to take us through the business plan towards the end of '28 are already available. On the corporate level, obviously, some of the projects will need to do the project level financing, which is a part of the ordinary of doing business, but the corporate side we are fully funded.

Operator: [Operator Instructions] And the next question today comes from the line of Michael Mcnulty from Deutsche Bank.

Michael Mcnulty: My first question relates to partial asset sales. Obviously, you did that last year with the Sunlight cluster. Can you touch on your expectations of partial asset sales into 2026, if anything is embedded in guidance? And then what we would need to see for that to happen.

Adi Leviatan: Thank you for the question, Mike. I will refer this one to our Chief Corporate Development Officer, Itay Banayan.

Itay Banayan: Mike, so we've mentioned it several times before. It is part of our strategy to contemplate minority sales or sell-downs of some of our projects where it makes sense and where it's accretive to the company. We have a lot of flexibility on our sources. So it did contribute to the numbers in 2025, and we don't see it as a onetime event. We think it will be part of the ordinary course of doing business. And also, when you can see on the road map to 2028, we are increasing -- gradually increasing the weighted average of our holding in our portfolio. We're going all the way to 91%. So there is a lot of meat on the bone. And when it will make sense, we might do like additional transactions like the one we did in Israel in '25.

Michael Mcnulty: Okay. That's helpful. And then my second question is a lot of the expansion in 2026 is weighted towards the latter half, I believe, 4Q. So with your overall guidance, can you talk about the key drivers of the growth within your guidance given a lot of the capacity is weighted towards the back half?

Adi Leviatan: Thank you for the question again, Mike. So the U.S. projects that we just connected in Q4 of 2025, Quail Ranch and Roadrunner are going to have their first full year of revenues in 2026. So -- and as you stated correctly, the projects we're connecting in 2026 will mostly -- I mean, they will have their full year of revenues in 2027. Thankfully, we are, I mean, well diversified across different geographies, different projects, different technologies. And so in addition to the ones I just mentioned in the U.S., there's also a very significant projects in Israel that are also -- have also been connected in 2025 and will have their first year of full revenues, project called Bar-On, which is a floating PV plus storage. So we have projects in Europe that we're also working on that will be connected earlier in the year. So overall, that is what's contributing to the growth in revenues and EBITDA in 2026.

Operator: There are no further questions. I will now hand the call back to Adi for closing remarks.

Adi Leviatan: We would like to thank you very much for supporting us for dialing into this call for asking questions. We highly appreciate the engagement with all of you, and we look forward to continuing to deliver excellent results and to see you in the next quarter. Thank you.

Operator: Thank you. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (ENLT)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd (ENLT) Financial Profile