Silicon Motion Technology Corporation

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) Market Cap

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation has a market capitalization of $3.82B, based on the latest available market data.

Financials updated on 2025-12-31

SectorTechnology
IndustrySemiconductors
Employees1819
ExchangeNASDAQ Global Select

Price: $113.90

-3.08 (-2.63%)

Market Cap: 3.82B

NASDAQ · time unavailable

CEO: Chia-Chang Kou

Sector: Technology

Industry: Semiconductors

IPO Date: 2005-06-30

Website: https://www.siliconmotion.com

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) - Company Information

Market Cap: 3.82B · Sector: Technology

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation, together with its subsidiaries, designs, develops, and markets NAND flash controllers for solid-state storage devices. It offers controllers for computing-grade solid state drives (SSDs), which are used in PCs and other client devices; enterprise-grade SSDs used in data centers; eMMC and UFS mobile embedded storage for use in smartphones and IoT devices; flash memory cards and flash drives for use in expandable storage; and specialized SSDs that are used in industrial, commercial, and automotive applications. It markets its controllers under the SMI brand; enterprise-grade SSDs under the Shannon Systems brand; and single-chip industrial-grade SSDs under the Ferri SSD, Ferri-eMMC, and Ferri-UFS brands. The company markets and sells its products through direct sales personnel and independent electronics distributors to NAND flash makers, module makers, hyperscalers, and OEMs. It operates in Taiwan, the United States, South Korea, China, Malaysia, Singapore, and internationally. Silicon Motion Technology Corporation was founded in 1995 and is based in Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Analyst ratings pending...

Consensus Price Target

No data available

Price & Moving Averages

Loading chart...

📘 Full Research Report

ℹ️

AI-Generated Research: This report is for informational purposes only. Please validate all data using official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

📘 Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) — Investment Overview

🧩 Business Model Overview

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) is a semiconductor infrastructure company focused on storage and memory controller solutions. The company’s core role in the value chain is to provide controller silicon and related firmware/software enablement that allow NAND flash memory to perform reliably and efficiently inside consumer and enterprise storage devices. In practice, SIMO’s products are used in solid-state drives (SSDs) and embedded storage implementations that rely on NAND flash, with performance and endurance characteristics largely determined by the controller’s architecture, error-correction and signal processing, host interface support, and power-management features.

SIMO’s business model is typically characterized by a mix of (i) design wins embedded in OEM and ODM platforms and (ii) recurring revenue tied to shipments of controllers into new production cycles. Because storage systems often have qualification requirements and ecosystem dependencies (firmware validation, compatibility testing, thermal and power constraints), revenue tends to be concentrated among established customers and reference designs, but it can also scale meaningfully once a controller platform achieves broad adoption across device makers and channel partners.

From an investor’s perspective, SIMO’s fundamental drivers are closely linked to (1) NAND flash consumption trends, (2) SSD penetration levels in client and industrial end markets, and (3) the evolution of NAND technologies (e.g., higher densities, new device generations, and endurance demands) that increase the premium value of controllers with strong reliability engineering.

💰 Revenue Streams & Monetisation Model

SIMO’s monetisation model is primarily product-based: revenue is generated from sales of SSD/controller ICs and related components used by original equipment manufacturers (OEMs), system integrators, and module makers. Controllers are monetized through unit economics that depend on bill-of-material competitiveness, feature sets, firmware maturity, and the ability to meet performance targets (throughput, latency, IOPS) while controlling cost.

The revenue mix is often shaped by end-device types and configurations. Controllers may be designed for different performance tiers, ranging from entry-level SSDs to higher-performance solutions targeting demanding workloads. In addition, embedded or mobile storage implementations can create distinct demand profiles relative to desktop and data-center SSDs, though the shared dependence on NAND generations and host interface standards remains a common thread.

SIMO also benefits from the fact that controller qualification can be “sticky” once integrated, since migrating to a new controller design can require additional validation work. This can support more durable revenue streams around specific platforms and adoption windows, though competition and technology migration still create periods of pressure when new architectures or feature expectations emerge.

A further component of monetisation is platform lifecycle management. As SSDs transition between NAND generations and address larger storage capacities, controllers must update to maintain performance, handle larger address spaces, and support advanced error correction and wear-leveling algorithms. This enables SIMO to refresh its product portfolio and maintain relevance across multiple design cycles, rather than relying on a single-generation product offering.

🧠 Competitive Advantages & Market Positioning

SIMO operates in a competitive landscape that includes other controller designers and integrated storage solutions. Its competitive edge typically stems from engineering depth in reliability and performance, plus the ability to ship in volume with stable firmware and manufacturing test coverage. Controller IP execution matters: error-correction efficiency, mapping strategies, garbage collection behavior, and thermal/power management can differentiate real-world user outcomes beyond specification-sheet performance.

Key areas where SIMO can build defensibility include:

  • Reliability and endurance engineering: Strong LDPC/advanced ECC implementation and robust flash management improve endurance outcomes, reduce uncorrectable error rates, and enhance consistency across different NAND vendors and program/erase conditions.
  • Performance responsiveness across workloads: Modern SSD controllers need to sustain throughput and maintain low latency under mixed read/write operations. This requires careful firmware scheduling, caching strategy, and host interface tuning.
  • Firmware and compatibility ecosystem: Storage controllers require significant validation across operating systems and workloads. Mature firmware and reference platforms can accelerate OEM design cycles and reduce integration friction.
  • Cost-competitive platform scaling: The controller market rewards designs that meet performance targets without excessive die cost or bill-of-material overhead. Achieving high yield and predictable production is a competitive necessity.

Market positioning is reinforced by the company’s ability to serve a broad range of SSD manufacturers and to participate in design wins that align controller capability with the needs of NAND-based storage. Because SSD adoption depends not only on storage capacity but also on total cost of ownership and device reliability, controllers that can consistently hit both performance and cost targets tend to capture favorable share during platform transitions.

The company’s positioning is also influenced by how effectively it navigates successive NAND migrations. As NAND technology evolves—often with changes in endurance characteristics, page size, and error patterns—the controller’s firmware and signal processing become increasingly important to preserve expected drive behavior. Controllers that demonstrate dependable performance across NAND variations are more likely to remain in new designs as OEMs seek to reduce risk.

🚀 Multi-Year Growth Drivers

SIMO’s multi-year growth potential is largely driven by structural demand for NAND flash and the continued expansion of SSDs across client, embedded, and industrial applications. While cyclical factors can influence annual shipment levels, the strategic direction of storage migration supports a multi-year thesis built on technology evolution and market adoption.

  • SSD penetration across consumer and enterprise: As costs decline and capacity increases, SSDs continue replacing HDDs in multiple workloads. Expansion in OS boot acceleration, responsiveness, and power efficiency supports sustained replacement activity and incremental adoption.
  • NAND capacity scaling and density transitions: Rising NAND densities require controllers to support larger address mappings and improved reliability techniques. Each migration increases the value of controller differentiation and refresh opportunities for new controller generations.
  • Performance expectations and interface evolution: Host interface standards and system-level performance expectations continue to rise. Controllers that can deliver consistent low latency, sustained throughput, and efficient caching strategies benefit from broader adoption in performance tiers.
  • Reliability demands and error-management sophistication: As NAND cells become more complex, the tolerance for firmware missteps decreases. Controllers with advanced ECC, wear-leveling, and garbage collection tuning can capture design wins where reliability is a primary purchasing criterion.
  • Embedded storage expansion: Many industrial, networking, and mobile platforms increasingly rely on embedded flash storage. Controller solutions supporting power constraints, reliability targets, and performance stability can expand SIMO’s addressable market beyond traditional retail SSDs.

Over a multi-year horizon, SIMO’s key challenge—and growth opportunity—is sustaining product transitions aligned with NAND roadmaps and competitive benchmarking. The best outcomes often occur when the company not only keeps pace with technical requirements but also achieves competitive cost and firmware maturity that reduce OEM integration risk.

⚠ Risk Factors to Monitor

Investment outcomes for SIMO depend on several risk categories typical for fabless semiconductor and controller-driven storage markets. Key risks to monitor include:

  • Pricing pressure and margin cyclicality: Storage controllers can experience competitive pricing swings as customers rebalance BOM costs. NAND market cycles can influence controller ASPs and promotional behavior among SSD vendors.
  • NAND supply/demand imbalances: Controller demand is linked to NAND consumption and SSD build activity. If end-demand weakens, OEM inventories can lead to production slowdowns and delayed qualification ramps.
  • Technology migration and qualification risk: New NAND generations require firmware and controller updates. Delays in qualification, firmware stability issues, or underperformance against competitive baselines can impair design wins and reuse rates.
  • Competitive intensity: The controller market includes established players and technologically capable rivals. Aggressive feature parity and price competition can compress margins even when the overall SSD market grows.
  • Concentration of customers and design wins: Revenue can be sensitive to customer platform decisions and procurement concentration. Loss of a major design win or a shift in customer strategy can create discontinuities.
  • Geopolitical and supply chain constraints: Semiconductor production and distribution involve cross-border logistics and access to manufacturing capacity. Export controls, regional policy changes, or supply interruptions can affect operations and customer relationships.
  • Quality, reliability, and field-performance risk: Storage products operate under stringent reliability requirements. Bugs in firmware, corner-case failures, or insufficient validation can lead to warranty costs, reputational damage, and loss of future qualification.

Investors should also evaluate management’s execution on inventory management, product roadmap alignment, and the sustainability of gross margin through storage cycles. In controller businesses, operating leverage can cut both ways: strong shipment growth can expand profitability, while demand softness can rapidly pressure utilization and margins.

📊 Valuation & Market View

Valuation for SIMO should be assessed through a framework that accounts for both the structural demand tailwinds in flash storage and the cyclical dynamics of NAND/SSD build activity. Because the controller market is closely tied to SSD shipments and NAND consumption, earnings power can fluctuate with device volumes and ASPs.

A market view that tends to be constructive generally includes:

  • Evidence of sustained design wins: Continued adoption of controller platforms in multiple SSD tiers and by diversified customers suggests resilience against single-customer disruptions.
  • Margin stability through cycles: The ability to maintain gross margin despite pricing pressure often reflects engineering differentiation, scale advantages, and yield/production competence.
  • Product roadmap credibility: Demonstrated capability to support multiple NAND generations with predictable firmware maturity reduces the probability of adverse qualification events.

A market view that is cautious often centers on:

  • Compressed pricing environments: Controller ASP declines can outpace cost reductions, limiting profitability even if volumes remain healthy.
  • Competitive feature parity: If rivals match performance and reliability at lower cost, incremental share gains may be difficult without margin tradeoffs.
  • Demand uncertainty in end markets: Any prolonged slowdown in SSD builds may shift bargaining power toward OEMs and SSD brands, pressuring controller economics.

In practical valuation terms, investors frequently triangulate between (i) discounted cash flow expectations anchored on achievable unit growth and sustainable margins, (ii) comparable semiconductor/controller multiples adjusted for cyclicality, and (iii) scenario analysis that considers downside pricing and volume outcomes. The most relevant analytical work often focuses on earnings durability—how much of profitability is structurally supported by differentiation versus temporarily supported by cycle conditions.

🔍 Investment Takeaway

SIMO offers a focused exposure to the ongoing expansion of NAND-based storage, with a business model centered on SSD and storage controller technology where reliability, performance, and firmware maturity create meaningful differentiation. The company’s long-term opportunity is anchored in structural SSD penetration, recurring technology transitions driven by NAND density evolution, and the persistent requirement for advanced error management and workload performance.

The primary investment debate typically revolves around resilience of margins and share gains through competitive pricing cycles, alongside execution risk during NAND/controller generation transitions. A disciplined investment case would weigh evidence of recurring design wins and firmware reliability, the company’s ability to sustain cost competitiveness, and the strength of customer relationships that support platform longevity.

Overall, SIMO can be viewed as a beneficiary of the multi-year shift toward flash storage—provided the company maintains product leadership, navigates NAND migrations without quality or qualification setbacks, and preserves profitability in the face of competitive and cyclical dynamics.


⚠ AI-generated — informational only. Validate using filings before investing.

Management sounded confident that Q4 delivered strong momentum (revenue $278.5M, GM 49.2%, op margin 19.3%, EPS $1.26) and that 2026 should be record-like with sequential growth, plus MonTitan scaling targets (5%–10% of revenue exiting 2026). However, the Q&A revealed the real constraint is supply-and-margin mechanics: BlueField/boot drive requires procuring NAND at market prices, which “definitely will impact” gross margin, and pass-through is negotiated quarter-by-quarter. They also highlighted concentration risk: only two NAND suppliers, with one “not secure,” creating operational uncertainty for enterprise and automotive/Ferri opportunities. Analysts probed timing and margin impacts, and management repeatedly anchored to negotiated pass-through and the sequencing/ramp of next-gen DPU (back half 2026) and MonTitan qualification through H1 then ramp in H2. Tone: bullish on product ramps; candid on margin volatility and procurement hurdles driving selectivity in which opportunities they pursue.

AI IconGrowth Catalysts

  • AI-driven demand supporting NAND/DRAM controller and storage solutions across eMMC/UFS, PCIe client SSD controllers, and enterprise SSD controllers
  • eMMC/UFS continued outperformance: eMMC/UFS business grew 25% for full-year 2025 (management claim) and is expected to remain a growth driver in 2026
  • Client SSD controller ramp: DRAM-less 4-channel PCIe 5 controller (introduced last quarter) expected to ramp significantly throughout 2026 (mainstream focus, easier SSD creation during DRAM shortage)
  • MonTitan enterprise SSD controller scaling: end-user qualification of TLC-based high-performance compute SSD began in Dec quarter; qualification through H1 2026; ramp commercially in H2 2026
  • Enterprise boot drive storage: began volume shipment in Q4 2025 to a leading AI GPU maker for current DPU product; next-gen DPU revenue expected back half of 2026
  • Automotive/Ferri storage: ramping automotive business to ~10% of total business by end of 2026 (management stated)

Business Development

  • Client SSD design wins for new DRAM-less PCIe 5 controller: secured design wins with 4 NAND flash makers, including 2 South Korea-based partners (TLC and QLC SSD) and nearly all module maker customers
  • MonTitan enterprise: qualification started with multiple customers for TLC-based high-performance compute SSD; expected ramp in H2 2026
  • MonTitan PCIe 6 tapeout: planned 4-nanometer PCIe 6 MonTitan tapeout in Q2 2026; developed with multiple partner customers; design wins already secured with multiple Tier 1 customers (expected to ramp significantly in 2028)
  • Enterprise boot drive storage: started volume shipment in Q4 2025 to a leading AI GPU maker for its current DPU product; working to qualify next-gen DPU plus NVLink/Ethernet switches for a new GPU/CPU platform launching in H2 2026
  • Additional boot drive customer: working with a leading search engine company to develop enterprise-grade boot storage drive
  • BlueField context: boot drive solution for BlueField and several switch platforms; management states NAND must be procured at market prices and cost pass-through is negotiated

AI IconFinancial Highlights

  • Q4 2025 revenue: $278.5M (+15% sequential; >45% YoY), exceeding high end of guided range and surpassing $1B run-rate target
  • Q4 2025 gross margin: 49.2% (higher end of guidance); increased again in the quarter driven by mix shift toward client PC products
  • Q4 2025 operating margin: 19.3% (in guided range), driven by higher-than-expected revenue and gross margin
  • Q4 2025 EPS (non-GAAP stated as "earnings per ADS"): $1.26
  • Q4 2025 cash: $277.1M (cash/cash equivalents/restricted cash) vs $272.4M at end of Q3; dividend payments of $16.7M; inventory increase to support ramp
  • Q1 2026 revenue guidance: $292M to $306M (5% to 10% sequential; counter-seasonal) expecting Q1 to be the lowest quarter of 2026
  • Q1 2026 gross margin guidance: 46% to 47% (slightly lower sequentially due to product mix)
  • Q1 2026 operating margin guidance: 16% to 18%
  • Full-year 2026 margin expectation: recover to target range of 48% to 50% as newer products (PCIe 5 controllers and enterprise SSD solutions) increase mix
  • Effective tax rate guidance: 19%
  • Operating expense cadence: higher tapeout/development costs expected, especially 4-nanometer tapeout in Q2 (driving higher OpEx in Q2 and Q3)
  • MonTitan revenue contribution target: at least 5% to 10% of company revenue when exiting 2026 (management stated). Management also clarified this excludes the boot drive solution portion.

AI IconCapital Funding

  • Cash and liquidity: $277.1M at end of Q4 2025 vs $272.4M at end of Q3 2025
  • Dividends paid in Q4: $16.7M
  • No buyback authorization/amount mentioned in the provided transcript

AI IconStrategy & Ops

  • Supply-driven product strategy: for certain businesses requiring NAND procurement (automotive, Ferri, boot drive), management may selectively bypass some opportunities if margin does not meet company targets while leveraging backlog
  • Supply constraint response: using long-standing NAND maker relationships to secure NAND supply for smartphone/PC OEM customers and for enterprise boot drive products
  • Engineering/tapeout roadmap: 6-nanometer client SSD controller progress; 4-nanometer PCIe 6 MonTitan tapeout planned in Q2 2026
  • Margin management approach for NAND-embedded solutions: cost increases expected to be partly pass-through to end customers but said to impact gross margin

AI IconMarket Outlook

  • 2026 quarterly shape: Q1 2026 lowest of the year; sequential growth expected each subsequent quarter
  • PC unit backdrop: PC unit shipments for 2026 expected to decline 5% to 10% (management stated)
  • Smartphone storage share/mix: UFS mostly smartphone, eMMC mostly non-smartphone/IoT and smart device categories; management stated smartphone vs non-smartphone mix for controllers is roughly 50/50 (based on their description)
  • PCIe Gen5 penetration expectations: management stated PCIe Gen5 ramp stronger in 2026; 8-channel high end to slow in 2026 due to DRAM shortage, while demand for DRAM-less PCIe 5 4-channel controller is expected to ramp more meaningfully from second half of 2026
  • Boot drive / DPU ramp timing: next-generation DPU revenue expected to begin in back half of 2026; NVLink/Ethernet switch products expected to launch in H2 2026, with more volume in 2027 (management stated)

AI IconRisks & Headwinds

  • NAND and DRAM supply tightness and rapidly increasing prices: described as creating intra-quarter price increases and supply constraints across markets (AI/enterprise storage/boot drives/PC/smartphones)
  • AI CSPs attempting to lock up DRAM and NAND supply through 2026, making it harder for other players to get product (management stated)
  • PC OEM demand risk via higher component costs and despecification: management cited value-segment storage potentially decreasing (example given: gigabyte class moving down to ~120GB) and that despec can reduce demand at value tiers
  • Enterprise/boot drive and automotive/Ferri NAND procurement difficulty: management stated they must procure NAND at market price for boot drive/BlueField solutions; this is challenging and impacts gross margin, mitigated via negotiated customer pass-through and the presence of 2 to 3 supplier options per customer
  • NAND supplier concentration risk: management stated they currently have 2 NAND suppliers—one secure and one not—so they are working continually with the partner to support major projects
  • Margin selectivity risk: management said they may bypass certain NAND-procurement dependent business if margin does not meet company targets

Sentiment: MIXED

Note: This summary was synthesized by AI from the SIMO Q4 2025 earnings transcript. Financial data is complex; please verify all metrics against official SEC filings before making investment decisions.

🧾 Full Earnings Call Transcript

Ticker: SIMO

Quarter: Q4 2025

Date: 2026-02-04 08:00:00

Operator: Hello, everyone. Welcome to Silicon Motion Technology Corporation's Q4 2025 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] I must advise you that today's call is being recorded. This conference call contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended. Such forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements regarding trends in the semiconductor industry and our future results of operations, financial conditions and business prospects. Although such statements are based on our own informations and informations from other sources we believe to be reliable, you should not place undue reliance on them. These statements involve risks and uncertainties and actual market trends and our results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements for a variety of reasons. Potential risks and uncertainties include but are not limited to, continued competitive pressure in the semiconductor industry and the effect of such pressures on prices, unpredictable changes in technology and consumer demand for multimedia consumer electronics, the state of and any change in our relationship with our major customers and changes in political, economic, legal and social conditions in Taiwan. For additional discussions on these risks and uncertainties and other factors, please see the documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We assume no obligations to update any forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this conference call. With that, I would now like to hand the call over to your first speaker today, Mr. Tom Sepenzis, Senior Director of IR and Strategy. Thank you. Please go ahead.

Thomas Andrew Sepenzis: Good morning, everyone and welcome to Silicon Motion's Fourth Quarter 2025 Financial Results Conference Call and Webcast. Joining me today is Wallace Kou, our President and CEO; and Jason Tsai, our CFO. Wallace will first provide a review of our key business developments and then Jason will discuss our fourth quarter results and outlook. Following our prepared remarks, we will conclude with a Q&A session. Before we begin, I would like to remind you of our safe harbor policy, which was read at the start of this call. For a comprehensive overview of the risks involved in investing in our securities, please refer to our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. For more details on our financial results, please refer to our press release, which was filed on Form 6-K after the close of market yesterday. This webcast will be available for replay in the Investor Relations section of our website for a limited time. To enhance investors' understanding of our ongoing economic performance, we will discuss non-GAAP information during this call. We use non-GAAP financial measures internally to evaluate and manage our operations. We have, therefore, chosen to provide this information to enable you to perform comparisons of our operating results in a manner consistent with how we analyze our own operating results. The reconciliation of the GAAP to non-GAAP financial data can be found in our earnings release issued yesterday. We ask that you review it in conjunction with this call. With that, I will turn the call over to Wallace.

Chia-Chang Kou: Thank you, Tom. Hello, everyone and thank you for joining the call today. I'm pleased to report that we delivered another excellent performance in the fourth quarter, exceeding our revenue and near the high end of operating margin guidance and positioning us for a record-breaking year in 2026. We benefit from strong demand across all our markets and through the introduction of compelling new controller and solutions. We increased market share in existing and new markets and expect the momentum to continue throughout 2026. We remain focused on delivering long-term growth, while investing heavily in next-generation products, increasing our engineering resources to support new product end markets and further positioning Silicon Motion for long-term market share expansion. While 2026 memory and storage industry dynamics are challenging given the supply tightness of NAND and DRAM and rapidly increasing prices of these components, we believe our resilient operation strategy and our unmatched NAND maker relationship will allow us to deliver strong growth across our business. Given our current backlog and sales plan, we believe that first quarter '26 revenue will be the lowest of 2026 and expect sequential growth throughout the remainder of the year. As we continue to introduce the [indiscernible] compelling new eMMC and UFS controller, PCIe client SSD controller, MonTitan enterprise SSD controllers, enterprise bodes solution and our expansion in Ferri automotive portfolio, we expect to deliver broad-based growth and to deliver the highest annual revenue in the history of the company in 2026 as we capitalize on multiple new products and execute on our continuing diversification strategy. I would like to start by addressing the current market environment. The rapid adoption and growth of AI has introduced significant demand across all memory and storage technology, including HBM, DRAM, NAND flash and even hard drives. The new and growing demand has led more recently to supply constraints, tight market condition and increasing pricing pressure across multiple markets, including AI and enterprise storage, boot drive drives, PC, smartphone and most other markets that use NAND flash. AI CSPs has attempt to lock up all the DRAM and NAND supply through 2026, which has made it increasingly difficult for other market player to get product and is driving significant intra-quarter price increases. Given the growing supply constraint in DRAM and NAND, industry analysts are beginning to take a more cautious approach regarding smartphone, automotive and PC unit growth in 2026. Silicon Motion, however, remain extremely well positioned in the consumer market despite the tight condition given our long-standing partnership with all the major flash vendors, our expanding market share within our existing market and the introduction of the new higher ASP products. We are leveraging our strong relationship with flash makers, OEMs and module maker to help secure NAND supply for our smartphone and PC OEM customers and ensure steady access to NAND even in the tight times. We are delivering greater value add to both our NAND maker partners and OEM customers, driving stronger partnership that will lead to sustainable long-term growth. As a result, despite the expected market headwind, based on our existing backlog, we expect growth in all our major product lines in 2026, including automotive, mobile, PC, enterprise SSD and boot drive storage solution given our strong and growing market position and leading product portfolios. I would now like to discuss our highlights in eMMC and UFS. Growing AI demand in focusing a more disciplined CapEx approach by memory and storage market to prioritize resources across multiple technology products and market. Increasingly, we are seeing additional opportunity for Silicon Motion to supply controller as NAND makers shift their internal resources to focus on DRAM, HBM and customized memory technology for high-performance AI requirements. The mobile market is a prime example of this trend as NAND makers are actively exiting mobile in favor of DRAM HBM, which has led our mobile business to outperform in 2025 as our eMMC, UFS business grew 25% for the full year, far outperforming the smartphone embedded market. Module maker are seeing great assets to access by using local NAND supply, coupled with our controller, just as many of other NAND flash maker have looked in to exit the mobile market in favor of the enterprise. We will continue to benefit given that we are the only meaningful merchant controller maker for the eMMC and UFS. While the overall smartphone market is expected to decline this year due to higher DRAM and NAND component cost, we expect the continuing shift from NAND flash maker to module maker to continue in 2026 and further benefit our eMMC, UFS controller business. Leveraging our strong relationship with local NAND makers and helping to align supply with handset OEMs and module maker will lead to continuing outperformance for our business. In addition, the market for eMMC are vast and growing with over 900 million units shipped annually. We are shipping eMMC into automotive, industrial, commercial, IoT, smart device, streaming device and many other markets. As flash makers has all but exited for eMMC market, the competition has diminished significantly and we are experiencing strong revenue contribution from this segment. Given our current backlog and customer outlook for 2026, we expect to significantly outpace the market and deliver another strong year of growth of our eMMC and UFS business despite the difficult market environment. I will now discuss our client SSD business. 2025 marked a turning point of our client SSD business, given the success of our new PCIe 5 controllers. We introduced our 8-channel PCIe 5 controller at the end of 2024 with 4 flash maker partners and nearly all module maker makers, setting us a clear path to grow our client PC market share from 30% today to 40% over the next few years. We expect our new DRAM-less 4-channel PCIe 5 controller that we introduced last quarter to ramp significantly throughout 2026, targeting the mainstream market and driving higher adoption of PCIe 5 given that it is DRAM-less, making it easier for our customers to create SSD despite DRAM shortage. We have secured design wins with 4 NAND flash makers, including the 2 from South Korea for TLC and QLC SSD and nearly all the module maker for this controller. And we expect to benefit from higher ASP and profitability as this new controller enters the mix. Until the memory and storage makers increase their big production capacity to alleviate the current shortage, the PC market will likely experience some difficulty driven by both shortage and demand destruction from higher prices. Silicon Motion, however, remain in excellent position to grow its PC business in the near to long term, given market share gains, ASP increases and growing decision by the NAND flash maker to walk away from the consumer business in favor of AI. And we expect continued growth from our client SSD business in 2026. I will now provide an update on our enterprise business. The opportunity of Silicon Motion in data centers and AI infrastructure expanding daily. Current expectation are for data center and AI infrastructure investment to exceed $1 trillion by 2030 and the [indiscernible] of NAND technology expanding rapidly to help store and process large volume of data quickly. The need for increased speed and lower latency has driven greater adoption of SSD in the data center. And the industry is increasingly looking to adopt NAND solution in one storage, compute storage and eventually near GPU storage as well. Interest in our growing portfolio of MonTitan controller is increasing as they are ideally suited to address the evolving requirement of AI workload for both compute and storage. In the December quarter, we began end user qualification of TLC-based high-performance compute SSD using MonTitan with multiple customers. This qualification will progress throughout the first half of calendar 2026 and will begin to ramp commercially in the second half of the year. High-capacity QLC-based storage SSD represents the largest addressable market for MonTitan and we remain on track with multiple customers to begin qualification this year. Our MonTitan QLC one storage solution offers significant advantage over HDD for AI inferences, including speed and power. Additionally, demand for QLC storage solution has accelerated in recent months given the current supply shortage of HDD. Over the next few years, we expect the QLC SSD will become a compelling alternative to HDD as they offer unmatched economies of scale, which will lead to lower prices over time, in addition to the inherent speed and power advantage. During 2026, we plan to tapeout our first 4-nanometer chip, a PCIe 6 version of MonTitan that is targeting hyperscalers, NAND flash maker, storage system provider, CSPs and other Tier 1 customers. We have been developing the chip in association with multiple partner customer and expect this new controller to drive additional success for MonTitan beginning in the 2027, '28 time frame. I'm pleased to announce that we have already secured design wins with multiple Tier 1 customer for this new controller, which is expected to ramp significantly in 2028. We remain confident that MonTitan will ramp to represent at least 5% to 10% of revenue, exiting 2026 and should experience further success in 2027 and beyond as our entry into enterprise market scale meaningfully in the near to midterm. And finally, I would like to discuss our enterprise-grade full drive storage business, which is rapidly evolving into a significant new era of growth for our company. We are allocating -- we are collaborating with multiple customers to develop an enterprise boot dive solution that can work across multiple platforms. In the fourth quarter, we started volume shipment to the leading AI GPU maker for their current DPU product. We are currently working with this customer to qualify the next-generation version of their DPU as well as their -- for several NVLink and Ethernet switches of their new GPU/CPU platform that are expected to launch in the second half of 2026. This next-generation DPU and switch product require higher capacities with much higher ASP and unit volume, creating a significant new growth opportunity for Silicon Motion. We are also working with other potential customer, including a leader -- leading search engine company to develop enterprise-grade boot storage drive based on our leading controllers. With the enterprise boot drive, our complete SSD product, this business will face greater exposure to our NAND scarcity and the high price environment, placing greater emphasis on sourcing NAND to supply our customer. While this has become more difficult given the supply constraint and recent price increases, we remain confident that our relationship with the NAND flash maker developed over the past 20 years will help us succeed with these significant new opportunities. For our Ferri storage solution, we are seeing strong demand from our automotive and industrial customers, especially in the tight NAND environment, our customer are relying more on us for steady and consistent supply to ensure smooth supply chain dynamics. We will continue to play a more strategic role and partner to our Ferri customer but we will also look to balance revenue growth with margin stability to drive profitability growth. In conclusion, the fourth quarter of 2025 delivered a significant growth for our business and accelerated our boot drive storage business. In 2026, beginning in the first quarter, we expect to continue to reap the reward of our investment in MonTitan, our 6-nanometer client SSD controller and our new portfolio of eMMC and UFS products that are experiencing rapid growth and the ramp of automotive business to about 10% of total business by the end of this year. We have never been better positioned as a company given our expanding product portfolio and scaling in a large new market, including the AI and enterprise storage market. I'm increasingly confident that we will deliver strong, broad-based, sustainable sequential growth throughout 2026 and beyond as we scale multiple existing and new opportunity. Now let me turn the call to Jason to go over our financial performance and outlook.

Jason Tsai: Thank you, Wallace and good morning to everyone joining us today. I will discuss additional details of our fourth quarter results and then provide our outlook. Please note that my comments today will focus primarily on our non-GAAP results unless otherwise specifically noted. A reconciliation of our GAAP to non-GAAP data is included in the earnings release issued yesterday. In the December quarter, sales increased 15% sequentially and over 45% year-on-year to $278.5 million, coming in well above the high end of our guided range and surpassing our $1 billion target run rate set at the start of the year as we experienced continued strength in mobile demand and strong growth in our PCIe 5 client SSD business. Gross margins was at the higher end of our guidance range and increased again in the quarter to 49.2% as we capitalized on new product introductions and benefited from mix shift towards client PC products. Operating expenses increased sequentially to $83.2 million, given increased investments in our emerging AI and enterprise SSD and boot drive storage businesses. Operating margin increased sequentially to 19.3%, within our guided range, driven by the higher-than-expected revenue and gross margin during the December quarter. Our earnings per ADS was $1.26. Total stock compensation, which we exclude from non-GAAP results, was $15.8 million in the fourth quarter. We had $277.1 million in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the end of the fourth quarter compared to $272.4 million at the end of the third quarter of 2025. Cash increased in the fourth quarter from improved operational performance, offset by a combination of dividend payments of $16.7 million and an increase in inventories to support expected strong business ramp. Our team is executing well despite the difficult NAND and DRAM pricing environment. During the fourth quarter of '25, we continue to invest in new advanced [ geometry ] products for our existing markets and for our emerging enterprise markets, including MonTitan SSD and enterprise boot drive solutions. These investments will be ongoing in 2026 as we support new growing interests for our new enterprise portfolio. For the first quarter of 2026, we now expect revenue to grow 5% to 10% to $292 million to $306 million, up sequentially and counter to typical seasonality. We expect continued strength across nearly all our product segments with a particular emphasis on mobile where we expect significant outperformance due to continued market share gains. Gross margins are expected to be slightly lower sequentially to -- at 46% to 47% in the March quarter, given the product mix. But we expect overall margins to recover back to our target range of 48% to 50% throughout the year, as the mix of newer products increases, including our PCIe 5 controllers and our enterprise SSD solutions. Operating margin is expected to be in the range of 16% to 18%. Our effective tax rate is expected to be 19%. Stock-based compensation and dispute-related expenses is expected to be in the range of $10.8 million to $11.8 million. We're well positioned for growth this year and expect 2026 to be a record revenue year for Silicon Motion with sequential revenue growth each quarter. We anticipate additional tapeout and development costs, especially from our upcoming 4-nanometer tapeout in the second quarter, will drive higher operating expenses in the second and third quarters of the year. Our focus has always been growing profitably and 2026 is no exception. We anticipate full year 2026 operating margins to improve as compared to 2025 despite our higher investments this year. While the current supply shortages and resulting component increases are creating headwinds, our pipeline for growth in 2026 and beyond remains stronger than it has ever been in the history of our company. We remain focused on our market and product diversification strategy, which has already begun to deliver results. We have successfully entered the enterprise market with our boot drive storage solutions and are currently in the end customer qualifications with our MonTitan enterprise SSD products, which are expected to scale in the second half of 2026. Our leading position in the merchant controller market and unmatched NAND maker partnerships will drive higher share in eMMC and UFS, client SSDs, enterprise, automotive, boot drives, storage, high-performance and high-capacity enterprise and data center storage markets. And I look forward to sharing our progress in greater detail when we report again in 3 months. This concludes our prepared remarks. I'd like to open the questions -- open it up to questions now. Operator?

Operator: [Operator Instructions] First question comes from the line of Mehdi Hosseini from SIG (sic) [ SFG ].

Mehdi Hosseini: Two for me. How should I think about the mix of eMMC, UFS revenue, especially in the back half of the year exiting this year? And I'm asking that because I'm under impression that there is a diversification by end market. It used to be a smartphone driven and now there is auto and I want to better understand how that diversification is going to play out towards the end of this year? And I have a follow-up.

Chia-Chang Kou: Our UFS controller majority is smartphone. eMMC controller majority is in IoT devices, smart device, streaming device and set-top box and nonautomotive. So the combination, I think the -- around probably 40% controller -- or probably roughly is similar, 50% for smartphone, 50% for nonsmartphone area.

Mehdi Hosseini: Okay. And then on the BlueField, how will revenue contribution play out? I think your commentary implied that there could be some revenue contribution later this year. And how would it impact your gross margin? I'm under impression that for BlueField, the COGS is going to change. You actually have to go procure NAND. And if you could just comment on it and let me know is the wrong assumption, that is corrected, how procuring NAND would actually impact the overall gross margin?

Chia-Chang Kou: Yes. BlueField -- our boot drive is a solution for BlueField and also several other switches platform. We need to procure the NAND and NAND price at the market price. So we have to work out with the customer, we can pass through the cost increase to the end customer. So it is challenging but ongoing process quarter-by-quarter. It definitely will impact some of our gross margin but we manage the margin pass-through. So I think because even the customers, they have at least 2 to 3 supplier, so they're based on the price and based on the supply and depends the percentage. We believe BlueField-3 is for -- primarily for this year [indiscernible] and the NVLink and the Ethernet switches is for the second half and really more volume in 2027.

Operator: Next question comes from the line of Neil Young of Needham & Co.

Neil Young: My first question is, I wanted to understand how you're segmenting revenue from the boot drive opportunity. And same question for MonTitan. Are they both in SSD solutions? Or is it just the boot drive, are you placing that in SSD solutions? And then at what point -- I think you sort of just answered this but just for clarification, what point do you anticipate revenue from the next-gen boot drive and those other switch opportunities that you talked about, with the leading GPU maker? When do you expect revenue for those to begin to ramp?

Jason Tsai: Yes. So you're right. For the boot drives, that's going to be part of our SSD solutions that we talk about each quarter. Enterprise controllers, MonTitan is part of our controller business. We will give you guys more color as it's appropriate.

Chia-Chang Kou: I think we -- when we talk about 5% to 10% for our company revenue, does not include the boot drive solution. So currently, that's only kind of MonTitan controller. But boot drive solution is part of our enterprise business. The -- we cannot comment regarding what percent about the boot drive. I think this year it's relatively still small but I think next year will be much bigger. But #1 is, we're trying to secure the NAND supply. Currently, we have 2 NAND supplier. One is secure but the other is not. So we're working with our NAND partner continually to support the major project.

Jason Tsai: We expect the next-generation DPU revenue to begin for us sometime in the back half of the year.

Neil Young: Okay. That's helpful. And then the second question. I just wanted to ask about the smartphone strength in 1Q. Maybe if you could just provide a little more detail sort of what's driving that? I think it's predominantly market share gains but if there's anything, different customer behavior or anything that you guys are seeing, that would be great.

Chia-Chang Kou: So first of all, as you know, probably 2 NAND makers walked away from the mobile storage. And we see -- but they're also still selling the wafer to module maker. And I think we benefit from majority module maker using silicon motion controller. They not only use NAND maker from U.S. and Japan but also use local NAND maker in China. That's why we continue to gain market share. And we see -- we gained market share from [indiscernible] and we expect to start to ramp the high end by end of 2026.

Jason Tsai: Anything else, Neil? Next question.

Operator: The next questions comes from Craig Ellis from B. Riley Securities.

Craig Ellis: Congratulations on the great execution, guys. I wanted to start out by going back to the comments on sequential growth through the year and just better understand some of the product level gives and takes as we go through the year. I think from what I've heard, it sounds like we'll see some real strength starting the year from eMMC and UFS and the color on MonTitan transition from sampling to revenue ramp-up would suggest more of a back half of the year orientation towards SSD solutions. And I think that would lead SSD controllers plugging along. Along with that, if we have sequential growth in the 3% to 5% range, we exit the year annualizing at a $1.3 billion to $1.4 billion run rate. Is that the right level of growth we should be thinking about? Or are you thinking about growth higher than that?

Jason Tsai: Yes. So you're -- I think you're right on some of these things. I think certainly strength in the first half of the year is coming primarily from eMMC and UFS. We'll see client SSD controllers ramp throughout the year but first quarter should be seasonally weaker. And then we'll see the MonTitan products begin to scale in the back half of the year. We do anticipate quarter-on-quarter sequential growth this year. We are not providing full year guidance specifically beyond just sequential growth and we expect this year to be a record year.

Chia-Chang Kou: So let me add some comment. I think we have very strong backlog and we have a very strong momentum from all product line. But because some of the products like automotive, Ferri and the boot drive, we required to procure the NAND. So the case by case, some business, we probably just bypass, some business we become strategic, we're going to take. So even potentially, we have a much higher growth rate but we might skip some of the business if the margin didn't meet our company target. So that's why we balance and the thing. But just from the backlog in the business, we decide to engage, we have a sequential growth quarter-by-quarter.

Craig Ellis: That's helpful. And then the follow-up question is really a longer-term question. for you, Wallace. You and I have known each other a long time. I've seen you transition the business previously from a USB and memory card business to one that's more oriented to smartphones and PCs. And it seems like you're doing it again, transitioning the business to include a very significant enterprise quotient. The question, do you see a point in the 2027, 2028 time period for that enterprise quotient is actually bigger than the consumer business? Would love to get your views on that and how you see the longer-term arc of the company playing out.

Chia-Chang Kou: I think enterprise segment definitely is a target one to grow. But when we can -- the enterprise portion exceed the consumer portion, we cannot really reveal to you. We target -- try to accelerate the momentum. But I think the boot drive is a really pretty strong business for us. We also have a multiple customers, not just one of the GPU customer. And in addition, automotive storage also very strategic. And we believe if we can procure NAND stably, we can grow even much faster. So we have a multiple weapon to grow but enterprise is stronger portion and we do have a -- some new product coming in the next 2 years. So we're excited -- we're very exciting about the opportunity to grow but just be patient with us and hopefully can grow much faster even 2027.

Operator: Our next question comes from Suji Desilva of ROTH Capital.

Sujeeva De Silva: Congratulations on the progress here. Maybe stepping back on calendar year '26, you talked about it being a growth year. You talked about 5 segments, auto, mobile, PC, enterprise, boot drive. Maybe you can talk about which ones would have the highest percent or dollar contribution to the growth in '26, given some of the moving parts around NAND supply and so forth?

Chia-Chang Kou: Percentage, I think the enterprise controller definitely grow much faster. Boot drive also is new to us. It growth percentage is much bigger. But from dollar-wise, I think the mobile controller, eMMC, UFS is a bigger one and it will exceed probably about 35%, 40% of our total company revenue. So I think these are all strong momentum to grow but we also see a more balanced growth continually moving to 2027.

Sujeeva De Silva: Okay. All right. And then specifically on the notebook SSD controllers, can you just talk about the puts and takes of how the year-over-year would trend given there's obviously NAND tightness and PC demand impact because of the cost of the inputs going up versus your share or your mix shift to premium, how that would all net together into a year-over-year trend for notebook SSD controller?

Chia-Chang Kou: So this is a very good question. I think the -- as you know very well, DRAM and the NAND supply is really very tied to PC OEM customers. So some can -- are able to secure the supply, some don't. So it gave a tremendous opportunity to Silicon Motion because the NAND maker, they move all the resource allocation to CSP. So the [indiscernible] is not enough for all the PC maker to meet their demand. So the -- because we have a 4 NAND maker using PCIe 5, 8-channel controller, 4 NAND maker also use a 4-channel [indiscernible] controller that balance about their internal allocation to fulfill the demand for NAND maker. In addition, because there's a shortage from NAND supply to PC OEM, module makers start to take -- takes the opportunity. So because we have majority module maker design win, that's why we fills the other gap. So even the total unit shipment for 2026 PC OEM will decline but I think for 5% to 10%. But we still have a pretty strong confident to grow continually in 2026.

Jason Tsai: And also, Suji, keep in mind, it's a combination of higher share, higher ASP products as we transition to PCIe 5, even with the 4-channel PCIe 5 controller, it's still a much higher ASP than a comparable PCIe 4. So we're going to get the benefit of both higher share and higher ASPs this year in spite of any sort of macro issues around PC unit volumes.

Operator: Our next question comes from Gokul Hariharan from JPMorgan.

Gokul Hariharan: So just wanted to understand, again, on the client SSD controller. What is the conversations you're having on the -- from the PC OEMs, given many of them are already sounding a little bit more skeptical about overall demand? Is there any indication that the spec migration is slowing down because of the cost inflation from PCIe Gen4 to PCIe Gen5 because the general commentary in the industry seems to be about some degree of despecing of certain specs. Just wanted to understand if you can give some indication of what is the baseline like PC market expectations that you have? And then how are you building on top of that, both for market share and units and ASP to kind of get to growth in the client SSD business? Yes. That's my first question.

Chia-Chang Kou: Yes. I think, Gokul, you got a very good question. It's -- we cannot comment for each individual PC OEM. But overall, I think the 2026 PC unit shipment will decline 5% to 10% and each OEM perform differently. Now regarding the sharp NAND price and DRAM price increase, so PC OEM outpaced the price increase quickly. So I think from value line and many would despec the storage product. So [indiscernible] gigabyte go down to 120 gigabyte. But for high end, they need to increase the price. So from despec portion, I think they will lose the demand and interest from value line customer. So that is a fact. So I think the impact for each of PC OEMs are different. And we see this is a current challenging situation for all the PC OEMs. And we work with the -- our module makers and work with the NAND maker because we also depend on their internal allocation for the NAND quarter-by-quarter. So it is very challenging. But because we have a much better position, so we have a much stronger opportunity to grow continually in 2026.

Gokul Hariharan: Got it. And any comments about like the PCIe Gen5 penetration? I think last year, I remember it was like 5% to 8%, or 5% to 6%. Are we expecting that this goes to like high teens, 20% by end of this year?

Chia-Chang Kou: Yes. So PCIe Gen5 is supposed to ramp much stronger in 2026 but for 8-channel high end because of DRAM shortage, that's why 8-channel increase will slow down dramatically in 2026. However, the PCIe 5 4-channel DRAM-less because no DRAM has much more to build the SSD to ship. So we see the much stronger demand for DRAM-less PCIe 5 controller, especially from the second half to ramp more meaningfully.

Gokul Hariharan: Okay. Understood. Second question on the boot drive storage. Could you help us understand how big this business could be because you've got the biggest GPU customer and it looks like for the next platform, this is going to be mandatory. And I think you just mentioned you're also getting the biggest ASIC program out there as well. So you're kind of locking up probably 80% or 90% of the market share of the market already from the addressable market. How sizable is boot drive storage business going to be? And are you still going to stick with the NAND bundle kind of model here? Or is it going to be eventually like NAND pass-through at higher margin?

Chia-Chang Kou: Yes. First of all, let me talk about the TAM. I think, first of all, the DPU, the boot drive business, it depend on the several factor, right, including the success of the DPU. But so far, we see the volume is very meaningful in 2026. And the -- all the leading CPU and GPU maker, they use a multiple supplier, 2 or 3 supplier. So we are not the sole supplier for the DPU program. We see this year revenue relatively around $50 million but I think next year will be much higher. So it all depends the NAND procurement from us. So it's a case by case because we have multiple programs, not just one GPU customer. We have a multiple customer and also some will ramp up from Q4, the new program. So it depends how success we secure the NAND, also whether we can pass through the incremental cost to the customer with a meaningful margin. So this is all the negotiations. So it's -- some is dynamic. And we just make a reasonable meaningful forecast for this year. And -- but it is a very strategic business for us for long term. So we work closely and build a partnership with our GPU partner. Hopefully, this will become a much larger business in '27 and '28.

Operator: [Operator Instructions] Our question is from Craig Ellis from B. Riley.

Craig Ellis: Wallace, I wanted to just talk about something and ask about something that we've started to see much more broadly with NAND flash and DRAM OEMs of late and see if it's got applicability to Silicon Motion. And the topic is long-term supply agreements, LTAs or LTSAs. Is that something that would make sense for SIMO? If so, where would that be? Would it not make sense for SIMO? Just talk about the gives and takes with any move in that direction.

Chia-Chang Kou: We currently we did not have the LTA agreement but I think based on partnership and relationship, see, because in the past, we never want to build a much bigger revenue from storage solution. And for automotive, because automotive sector, they are the lowest priority for NAND and DRAM maker. That's why many, many major Tier 1 supplier come to Silicon Motion, ask for help. That's why we will case by case to make a decision whether we can support them. If the -- we are able to pass through the incremental cost to the automotive supply chain and we will do the business. If the other hand, for boot drive, it's more strategic business. So some -- in certain case, we might have to sacrifice the margin lower than our corporate average margin because more strategic. So balancing, I think in the long term, because we cannot use a multiple NAND selection, it's take a time and the customer does not want to change the NAND solution either. So we just have to work out the -- with our NAND partner to get a stable supply. The challenging thing is much more severe than anybody can imagine because CSP really demand much more than the current supply can support. And that's why even leading smartphone maker have a tough time to procure their NAND and LPDDR5 supply. So this is the fact. And it's just not one NAND maker cannot supply us because just they really have tough time to do allocation and so many big Tier 1 customer ask for help and ask for supply. So this is a challenging situation right now.

Craig Ellis: That's really helpful. The follow-up somewhat relates to the way you concluded that. And it's an inquiry on some of the inside baseball, not asking for customer names. But if we go back to January 5 or 6 when NVIDIA said that, okay, look, the bottleneck in inference is all around the DPU. It's all around the storage. We've got to find a way to drive a 5x increase in inference processing time. We're going to do it with much more NAND-intensive architectures. The question is, what have you seen from existing and new enterprise customers following that? Have you seen that catalyze new levels of engagement? And what does it mean for how you think about R&D and just how you're looking at opportunities going forward?

Chia-Chang Kou: Because in -- AI inferencing is growing much faster than anybody can anticipate. So there's so many new technology, so many new storage technology around, right, for KV cache, how you can improve the latency, how you really -- and capacity also increased dramatically because so many new content, new data need a storage device to keep it. So this is a huge momentum and need the NAND maker to increase capacity. But because there's a limitation for land, for clean room, for equipment build, it all take your time and it need a tremendous CapEx. So a lot of the several NAND, DRAM maker, their preference is definitely DDR and HBM, right? So the left over -- the CapEx for the NAND is limited. But then we see the demand is very strong and so many variable technology and it's just much more and they all need MonTitan to fill the role. And hopefully, I think our customer and ourself can secure the NAND and we can pay our duty to fulfill obligation to be part of the AI game.

Operator: I would like to invite once again Mr. Matt Bryson from Wedbush to ask question.

Matthew Bryson: Awesome. Sorry about that. Great quarter. One question, one follow-up for me. So you have the large fabs seemingly shifting allocation away from handsets and PCs to support that cloud demand. And that, at least to me, seems like it creates significant room for share gains for SIMO over a multiyear period, particularly in the Chinese handset market. But we also know that China tends to prefer Chinese production when it's a viable alternative. At the same time, it also seems like the Chinese controller vendors have really struggled to compete technically. So would you mind just talking a little bit about competitive dynamics, whether anything is changing in that market and some of the structural dynamics that might make it hard for the domestic Chinese players to compete?

Chia-Chang Kou: I think the Chinese controller maker, they will have tough time to secure TSMC advanced technology node. So I think the -- to beyond 12 nanometers, like 7 nanometer, 6 nanometer, 5 nanometer, it's -- they have to be applied and to be approved by TSMC or Samsung in order to fabricate their advanced technology node product. For mature technology for 22 nanometer, 28 nanometer, China local fab can fabricate but that is really legacy product. So I think that is tough in part and we believe we need to mention the technology, how good they are or whatever. But that is a manufacturing point of view. We see due to the NAND supply shortage, I think create another dilemma. So that will probably give even tough time for China local supplier. But to say that, I think both YMTC and CXMT, they also try to increase capacity as much as they can but just take time.

Jason Tsai: Another thing, Matt, is that our controllers manage everybody's NAND, right? And so working with a lot of the module makers, especially in China, that does qualify a lot of local production there because we're using -- the module makers are building a lot of these solutions for the Chinese handset OEMs as well.

Chia-Chang Kou: Using our controller not only can sell in China locally, can sell to internationally.

Matthew Bryson: Makes sense. And so just one more quick question. With regards to the lower gross margins in Q1 on mix, Jason, can you just talk to whether that's lower margins on controllers or whether it's -- you're shipping more modules and so the NAND weighs on the gross margins?

Jason Tsai: Yes. As we've talked about before, eMMC and UFS, our mobile controllers tends to be a little bit below corporate average. So as that business is a little bit stronger here in the first quarter, that's going to have some pressure on our gross margins in the near term. But as we have MonTitan and more PC client SSD products ramping in the back half of the year, we do expect to see improvements in our gross margins as we go into the back half of the year.

Operator: At this time, there are no further questions on the line. I'd like to hand the call back to the management for closing.

Chia-Chang Kou: Thanks everyone, for joining us today and for your continuing interest in Silicon Motion. We will be attending several investor conferences over the next few months. The schedule of this event will be posted in the Investor Relations section of our corporate website and we look forward to speaking with you at this event. Thank you, everyone, for joining today.

Operator: That does conclude today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines.

Fundamentals Overview

Loading fundamentals overview...
Loading financial data and tables...
📁

SEC Filings (SIMO)

© 2026 Stock Market Info — Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO) Financial Profile